BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs Kaseya Traverse comparison

BMC Helix and Kaseya are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. BMC Helix is ranked #45, while Kaseya is ranked #32 with an average rating of 8.0. BMC Helix holds a 0.3% mindshare in CMS, compared to Kaseya’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of BMC Helix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Kaseya users who would recommend it.

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Read 5 BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management reviews

494 Views
203 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Kaseya Traverse

Read 8 Kaseya Traverse reviews

617 Views
376 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Kaseya Traverse

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management and Kaseya Traverse are cloud-related solutions each with distinct advantages. BMC offers more competitive pricing and superior customer support, whereas Kaseya is recognized for its comprehensive features.

Features: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management automates deployment processes, manages complex environments, and focuses on lifecycle management. Kaseya Traverse provides extensive network monitoring, robust performance analytics, and gives users detailed infrastructure insights.

Room for Improvement: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management could improve its deployment simplicity and reduce setup complexity. Kaseya Traverse may enhance its customer support, streamline its user interface, and offer better cost-efficiency in network monitoring.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kaseya Traverse offers a straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. In contrast, BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management has a more complex setup but offers comprehensive support ensuring smooth integration.

Pricing and ROI: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is cost-effective with a significant ROI, especially in lifecycle management scenarios. Kaseya Traverse requires a higher initial investment, but its monitoring capabilities promise strong long-term ROI for companies focused on network insights.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Kaseya Traverse Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Kaseya Traverse

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

45th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (38th)

Kaseya Traverse

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

32nd

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (59th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaseya Traverse is 0.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Kaseya Traverse	0.4%
BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management	0.3%
Other	99.3%

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Entprssol67

Enterprise Solution Architect at Engineering Ingegneria Informatica SPA

Helps design blueprints in a cloud environment but the support is a major problem

One of the major problems is that support is not so good. I used to have a support expert in Spain but they left two years ago. BMC doesn't invest a lot in network automation but network automation is a major point in CLM. There aren't any experts here in Europe, maybe they have in America, I don't know. The main problem is the support in Europe. We had a lot of problems with the people who got put on our cases. The agents that we were assigned to were not so capable. They wanted to replicate the problem. If you have an incident, it takes a lot of time to troubleshoot the problem. The incident support is not so good. The technicians don't know the platform well. BMC doesn't want to invest in CLM. Two years ago we had a lot of problems. Maybe BMC realized that CLM is an end of life product.

Read full review

AMMAR HUMAIDY HUSIN

Technical Consultant at a university with 11-50 employees

Automation increases efficiency, but pricing needs to be more competitive

Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpful for me as a customer. The issue always is the price, as we cannot beat most of our competitors on pricing alone. If a product is just nice to have, not essential like an antivirus, if it's not really competitive with pricing, we cannot sell it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CLM has a multi-cloud portal because they have the resources to implement in various environments in various ports."

"Supports unattended installs and image-based, script-based, or template-based provisioning."

"Automates Java EE Application Deployment from an SCM system."

"Assesses change impact or completes an audit using multiple dashboard views."

"You can tie together your public and private cloud infrastructure into a "single pane of glass"."

"By allowing end users to request their own services, the request process for systems is much quicker and more accurate."

"Integrates role-based access control with pre-configured policies for CIS, DISA, HIPAA, PCI, SOX, NIST, and SCAP documentation and remediation."

"Most of the features are pretty good and the solution is user friendly."

"We have found the solution to be very flexible to our requirements. We have been able to configure it on-premise effectively when we were using less of the cloud."

"It is a pretty stable solution...It is a pretty stable solution."

"If I want to automate the management and maintenance of my server automatically, this product is a good use case for that."

"Everything is running seamlessly on the solution, to the point where you don't see any gap."

"Automating processes is crucial for me, so the automation part stands out."

"It's a simple and humble tool."

"Kaseya Traverse is a very stable solution and very sustainable in terms of what the market wants, what is out there, price-wise and functionality features. They're quite competitive and they are always innovating."

More Kaseya Traverse pros

Cons

"One of the major problems is that support is not so good."

"Needs integrations with other providers to provide a custom public cloud environment."

"The installation and configuration can be tricky due to it being built on Remedy."

"The tool needs to have some AI capabilities, which it lacks currently."

"Kaseya Traverse can improve by adding a Service Map to help us create a configuration management database (CMDB), this would be helpful for us."

"We've noticed a few bugs as of late. However, this seems to only be in the reporting part of the product."

"Dashboards and Central Protection were an issue. Also, database monitoring was not there. Even though they said that it was there at an additional cost, that tool was very basic. We couldn't have device configuration backup also."

"Reporting is a bit difficult."

"Improvement is needed in making it cheaper."

"In terms of what could be improved, we are innovating all the time, as well as having a look at different avenues so that the strategy follows the structure. I think the software is still a little bit too new to actually fully asses what it has."

"However, the issue lies in the adequacy of the responses to my questions, which are usually not up to par."

More Kaseya Traverse cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive."

"The price depends on whether you are monitoring different applications, especially in bulk, and depends on what you're doing. If you're monitoring one endpoint, it will cost you 150 ZAR."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

26%

Wholesaler/Distributor

10%

Government

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Kaseya Traverse?

The remote support and data collection features are great.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaseya Traverse?

The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive. We pay an annual license fee. There are no additional fees associated with the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaseya Traverse?

See all answers

Comparisons

Pandora FMS vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 31% of the time

CloudBolt vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 25% of the time

Amazon CloudWatch vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 22% of the time

BMC Helix Cloud Security vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 22% of the time

More BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management Competitors

PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 58% of the time

Pico Corvil Analytics vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 42% of the time

More Kaseya Traverse Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

October 2025

Download BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Kaseya Traverse

September 2025

Download Kaseya Traverse product report

Also Known As

BMC CLM

No data available

Overview

BMC's cloud management platform drives digital innovation with agile, full-stack service provisioning across cloud and traditional platforms. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management scales easily while integrating with essential compliance and governance policies to reduce risk.

BMC Helix

Immediately identify impacted IT services using insights based on rich data analytics of events such as SNMP traps, Windows events and Syslogs. Resolve faults quickly via NetFlow enabled root cause analysis across cloud, on-premise, hybrid cloud and virtualized IT environments.

Kaseya

Sample Customers

JDA Software, Morningstar, Orange Business Services, Wipro

UltiSat, Clear Concepts, nVidia, United States Postal Service, Cisco, Redbox, Spark Digital, People's Bank & Trust

Buyer's Guide

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Kaseya Traverse

September 2025

Free Report: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Kaseya Traverse

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Kaseya Traverse and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Kaseya Traverse report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.