No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

BMC AMI Security vs CA VM:Secure comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 8, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

BMC AMI Security
Ranking in Mainframe Security
7th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
CA VM:Secure
Ranking in Mainframe Security
10th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Mainframe Security category, the mindshare of BMC AMI Security is 8.3%, up from 7.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CA VM:Secure is 4.4%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Mainframe Security Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
BMC AMI Security8.3%
CA VM:Secure4.4%
Other87.3%
Mainframe Security
 

Featured Reviews

Kalpesh Pawar - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Head Cloud Services at Softcell Technologies Limited
Centralized automation has strengthened mainframe security and reduced compliance effort
The best features of BMC AMI Security are real-time threat detection and automated response. Real-time threat detection and automated risk response help my team by reducing manual monitoring effort. The faster incident response gives us lower MTTR. Automated alerts plus policy-driven actions enable immediate containment without waiting for SOC intervention, and it improves our security posture at scale. Continuous detection plus auto-remediation ensures consistent enforcement across all customer environments, minimizing drift and insider risk exposure. The feature that stands out for my team is strong policy automation plus standardization, helping ensure consistent RACF controls across all clients and reducing operational overhead. The tight fidelity SMF visibility enables precise monitoring and faster RCA at the user dataset level. Since implementing BMC AMI Security, it has positively impacted my organization by reducing MTTR and manual effort. Automated detection plus response eliminates manual log analysis and accelerates incident containment. It has also improved our compliance posture with continuous monitoring and auto-generated audit reports, ensuring consistent adherence across all customer environments. I have observed specific metrics since implementing BMC AMI Security. MTTR has been reduced by 40 to 50 percent due to real-time alerts plus automated responses. The compliance effort is reduced by 50 to 60 percent with automated reporting and continuous control validation. Additionally, manual monitoring effort has been decreased by 40 percent.
it_user507375 - PeerSpot reviewer
Operating System Engineering at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
It gives us a consolidated management tool to keep track of the user directories on our z/VM platform.
We had an issue a few weeks ago in a test environment after putting an upgrade on, but we think it turned out to be that it wasn't really CA's fault. We think it's a problem with IBM and the GDPS product, and a test was being done with it the night before. It caused some weirdness with other products that we found out later, because it allowed two machines to get read/write access to a single minidisk, which never should have happened. That caused problems for CA but it wasn't really their product. We ended up on the phone with them for quite a while until we realised it was something else.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I have seen a return on investment of 120 percent over three years, reduced downtime by 50 percent with faster detection directly impacting availability and SLA compliance, and achieved operational cost reductions of up to 60 percent with lower operational overhead needed."
"As far as the functionality, stability and integration with the other products in their suite, I think this product would be hard-pressed to beat."
 

Cons

"BMC AMI Security can be enhanced by improving the analytics and AI modules."
"It might be nice if it had more of a modern-type GUI interface. Right now, it's all green screen-based."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mainframe Security solutions are best for your needs.
885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Also Known As

No data available
CA VM:Secure for z/VM
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Macquarie, HCF, Telefónica Colombia, Ministério da Educaçāo
Neovera, Vodafone Turkey, Comcast
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, IBM, Broadcom and others in Mainframe Security. Updated: March 2026.
885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.