BMC AMI DevX vs File Master Plus comparison

Why PeerSpot?

BMC and Broadcom are both solutions in the Mainframe Testing Tools category. BMC is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.8, while Broadcom is ranked #5. BMC holds a 18.9% mindshare in MTT, compared to Broadcom’s 8.2% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

BMC AMI DevX

Read 23 BMC AMI DevX reviews

8,760 Views
1,226 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

File Master Plus

Read 3 File Master Plus reviews

525 Views
499 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BMC AMI DevX

File Master Plus

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

BMC AMI DevX and File Master Plus are competing products in the enterprise software market. BMC AMI DevX has an edge in pricing and support, while File Master Plus stands out in features, delivering more value.

Features: BMC AMI DevX provides strong integration capabilities with various systems, offering high customization and advanced automation tools. File Master Plus emphasizes robust data management features and a comprehensive suite of development utilities enhancing productivity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: File Master Plus features a simplified deployment process, allowing for quick setup praised for its simplicity. BMC AMI DevX's more intricate integration capabilities lead to a more detailed deployment but benefit from proactive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: BMC AMI DevX presents a competitive pricing model appealing to companies seeking rich support services, offering a satisfactory ROI over time. File Master Plus, with its feature-rich functionalities, has a higher initial setup cost but provides substantial ROI through powerful capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC AMI DevX vs. File Master Plus Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX vs. File Master Plus

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC AMI DevX

Ranking in Mainframe Testing Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Configuration Management (1st), Debugging (2nd), Database Development and Management (11th), Mainframe Application Development (1st), Test Data Management (4th), Data Masking (3rd), AI Software Development (29th)

File Master Plus

Ranking in Mainframe Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Mainframe Testing Tools category, the mindshare of BMC AMI DevX is 18.9%, down from 29.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of File Master Plus is 8.2%, up from 5.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mainframe Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
BMC AMI DevX	18.9%
File Master Plus	8.2%
Other	72.9%

Mainframe Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Wisdom Mbiza

Product Engineer at Absa Group

Modern tools have boosted mainframe file extraction speed and simplified everyday workflows

I definitely think BMC AMI DevX could be improved or enhanced in terms of the logging in features. BMC AMI DevX's logging in feature is not so great. Whenever you try to log in, it always prompts you for passwords. Then when you have to switch sessions, because we usually have to switch between production and UAT, there's no quick way of switching between the two. Every time you try to switch, it prompts you to log in. Additionally, there's a pop-up that I always receive. When you click X on it, it doesn't disappear. Eventually, I just end up minimizing it. Furthermore, the startup of BMC AMI DevX takes a long time to start up before it loads. It doesn't just immediately start up and it's ready. It takes a good solid two to three minutes before it's ready so that you can work on it. BMC AMI DevX's logins and the other ones I can understand because security has to be there, but I do feel that once I've logged in, I shouldn't need to log in again. The startup problem is the annoying one because if I want to do something, I need to open it two or three minutes earlier to give it time to load up. The startup problem is the one that definitely needs to be addressed.

Read full review

it_user847152

Director of Enterprise and Mainframe Infrastructure at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Eases manageability of data, gives us better efficiency on our batch run

I use it for doing final file maintenance It's easier to do basic tasks; ease of manageability of data. It also gives us better efficiency on our batch run and our day-to-day. In terms of meeting business challenges, it's more of a productivity tool. It makes our data easier to manage. Ease of…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"BMC AMI DevX helps me develop COBOL while juggling other responsibilities by bringing editing, debugging, job submissions, and code navigation into a single environment."

"It speeds up processes, makes things easier, more efficient, and from a mainframe perspective, the way the mainframe is utilized has become that much easier."

"The most valuable feature of Topaz is Xpediter. It's more flexible than Xpediter through MVS."

"I like the ability to flow through the source and see what happens to the data as the statements are executed. If there is a fault, it will track the event, and we can then look back to see why it may have caused the fault. You can also reverse engineer your test. You can set it so that you can go backward as well as forward in your test. This is something that I haven't done here at my company. Compuware Xpediter is one of the best debugging tools for mainframe software development. We have currently licensed only the COBOL language for Xpediter, but I know they have other languages, including Assembler, PL/I."

"It helps our staff work by speeding up their documentation process."

"BMC AMI DevX tools have noticeably impacted our developers' productivity and efficiency."

"BMC AMI DevX Code Pipeline is a solid product that any company can benefit from if they want to have tight control and a standard way of deploying applications into production in a secure manner."

"Our intention is to use Topaz for the next generation of mainframe developers to maintain mainframe applications."

More BMC AMI DevX pros

"It also gives us better efficiency on our batch run and our day-to-day."

"CA File Master handles IMS data (together with Grid Tools), which we can use to mask/privatize our data then store on IMS databases."

"The Browse function and utilities are valuable; the solution is easy to use."

"Makes it quick to investigate/fix problems related to application data, and our business can get back to normal operations in short order."

"We use it together with Grid Tools to mask IMS data."

"Provides ease of use, ease of manageability, and ease of managing DSN files."

Cons

"I'm waiting to see what 19.2 for Topaz looks like, but I have a problem with the JES Explorer right now. It limits you to a certain prefix for job names and there are some groups that have multiple prefixes that they'd like to see all at once in their job names, because of how they work in a group. And they can't see that in the JES Explorer."

"It's not as intuitive as it should be. In terms of navigation, there is a large training curve for using it. For a millennial it might be better, if they're used to Eclipse. But coming from a non-Eclipse environment and using Eclipse, though I have experience with Eclipse, it might be cumbersome."

"While I am aware of the possibility to integrate Git with BMC AMI DevX zAdviser, this integration does not fit within our solution landscape."

"I'm always looking for improvement in things like the documentation, to make things a little bit easier and simpler to understand, a place where people can go to troubleshoot issues."

"It would be nice to have an audit trail to see what mainframe developers are using what."

"Topaz Workbench often doesn't play well with other plugins in the environment."

"The solution could be improved by being better integrated with the open world. In the next release, I would like to have the ability to work in an open environment whilst remaining integrated with the legacy environment."

"One area for improvement with this product could be in providing clearer guidance and tools for disaster recovery planning and execution."

More BMC AMI DevX cons

"The setup is quite complex. We needed a system programmer for the initial setup."

"CA File Master cannot handle IMS Sysplex."

"It would be better if it took less CPU time."

"For any change to CA File Master, we need a system programmer, which makes the change process very time consuming."

"They need to keep coming out with new features, and new releases. There hasn't been a new release in a while."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The only thing I would mention related to the licensing and/or the pricing, is that they have some visualization features in there that are licensed by concurrent users. We're starting to trip up on that. We're looking to probably increase the number of concurrent licenses that we have. But those types of licensing strategies, where they license by concurrent users or the number of seats is confusing for some people. They don't understand why it works sometimes and doesn't work other times."

"The price point is great."

"In terms of pricing, there isn't an extra charge for the parts of it we use. It comes with the licenses we purchased for other products, so no complaints there. The licensing is built in with the other products that you purchase from Compuware."

"In general, Compuware tools are very competitive."

"It has saved our developers time and effort when working on documentation, which is now more readable and fluent."

"I like the seat-based licensing much more than MSU-based licensing, and that the cost has been competitive."

"The pricing is good value."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mainframe Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

30%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	20

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BMC Compuware Topaz Enterprise Data?

My understanding is that BMC AMI DevX is an enterprise product with custom licensing, so pricing is typically negotiated based on factors such as the modules purchased, organization size, and usage...

See all answers

What needs improvement with BMC AMI DevX?

BMC AMI DevX is a strong platform, but there are a few areas where it could improve, such as simplifying the initial installation and configuration, especially for first-time users. It could also i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for BMC AMI DevX?

My main use case for BMC AMI DevX is to work with COBOL and JCL development on IBM. I mainly use it for editing, browsing data sets, submitting jobs, and debugging applications. I appreciate the Ec...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Endevor vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 5% of the time

Perforce Delphix vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 4% of the time

Broadcom Test Data Manager vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 4% of the time

Gen vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 3% of the time

IBM InfoSphere Optim vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 3% of the time

More BMC AMI DevX Competitors

IBM File Manager vs File Master Plus

Compared 30% of the time

InterTest vs File Master Plus

Compared 18% of the time

IBM Application Performance Analyzer for zOS vs File Master Plus

Compared 15% of the time

More File Master Plus Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX

September 2026

Download BMC AMI DevX product report

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX vs. File Master Plus

September 2026

Download File Master Plus product report

Also Known As

File-AID, Data for Db2, Code Debug, Data Studio, Workbench for Eclipse, Code Pipeline

CA File Master Plus

Overview

BMC AMI DevX is a mainframe DevOps platform for IBM Z environments that helps development and platform engineering teams increase release velocity, reduce change risk, and build a sustainable mainframe developer workforce.

Whether the priority is attracting the next generation of mainframe talent, safely evolving decades of business-critical code, accelerating release velocity, or demonstrating development ROI to leadership — BMC AMI DevX is designed to address all on a single platform. Teams can connect existing tools and adopt capabilities incrementally using an open-borders integration approach.

A 2025 Forrester Total Economic Impact study found that customers using BMC AMI DevX onboarded developers 50% faster, completed code changes 33% faster, increased release frequency by 50%, and reduced change failure rate by 33%.

Key capabilities:

Modern IDE integration (VS Code, Eclipse) with a unified development environment that reduces context switching
AI-powered code analysis including dependency mapping, impact analysis, and runtime execution path visualization
Automated unit, functional, integration, and performance testing with code coverage analysis
Git-compatible CI/CD integration with event-driven webhooks and an open plug-in library
DORA metrics and DevOps KPI tracking with AI/ML anomaly detection across the mainframe SDLC

BMC

File Master Plus is a dynamic solution designed for efficiently managing files, streamlining processes, and enhancing data organization. Tailored for businesses, it effectively addresses complex file management needs with advanced features.

With File Master Plus, businesses can better manage their data with robust file management tools. Its comprehensive suite offers seamless integration into existing systems, ensuring smooth workflows and optimized performance for users across industries. Designed with flexibility in mind, it adapts to diverse business environments, making it an essential tool for enhancing file efficiency and control.

What are the key features of File Master Plus?

Advanced File Management: Streamlines organization with customizable folders and tagging options.
Secure Data Encryption: Prioritizes security with state-of-the-art encryption techniques.
Seamless Integration: Works with numerous existing software platforms for smooth transitions.
Automated Backup: Provides reliable backup processes to prevent data loss.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Increased Productivity: Users often notice efficiency improvements, reducing file search time.
Data Security: Many reviews highlight improved security measures and peace of mind.
Cost Efficiency: Businesses can cut overhead costs associated with data management tasks.
Scalability: Users appreciate the ability to scale features and resources according to needs.

File Master Plus implementation varies by industry, with its flexibility benefiting sectors like finance, healthcare, and education. For finance, it ensures secure transaction records. Healthcare benefits from streamlined patient record handling. Education systems enjoy easier access to academic resources and administrative data. Its adaptability is key in meeting specific demands across fields.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

NRB, Iberdrola, Consorzio Servizi Bancari

Blue Hill Data Services

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX vs. File Master Plus

September 2026

Free Report: BMC AMI DevX vs. File Master Plus

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC AMI DevX vs. File Master Plus and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC AMI DevX vs. File Master Plus report.

See our list of best Mainframe Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mainframe Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.