BlazeMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs k6 Open Source comparison

Perforce and k6 are both solutions in the Load Testing Tools category. Perforce is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.9, while k6 is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.5. Perforce holds a 10.1% mindshare in LTT, compared to k6’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Perforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of k6 users who would recommend it.

BlazeMeter

Read 49 BlazeMeter reviews

4,392 Views
3,733 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

k6 Open Source

Read 2 k6 Open Source reviews

786 Views
613 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Read 84 OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) reviews

2,310 Views
1,848 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

BlazeMeter

k6 Open Source

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BlazeMeter, k6 Open Source, and OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Tricentis, OpenText and others in Load Testing Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Load Testing Tools Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Load Testing Tools

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,275 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Load Testing Tools category, the mindshare of BlazeMeter is 10.1%, down from 16.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of k6 Open Source is 3.9%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is 5.6%, down from 6.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Load Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
BlazeMeter	10.1%
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)	5.6%
k6 Open Source	3.9%
Other	80.4%

Load Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Manoj Raghavendra

Director at SMKR Consultancy LLP

Provides global load simulations without managing infrastructure and offers built-in reporting features

BlazeMeter should improve or make available some features out of the box that JMeter requires customization for. The licensing cost is also a concern since BlazeMeter is not free like JMeter, which limits its use. Additionally, if there is no host in preferred locations such as some Asian or Middle Eastern countries, it might not be convenient to use BlazeMeter.

Read full review

NalinGoonawardana

Principal Consultant ( Test automation - Performance testing) at TTC Global (TTC) at TTC at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Offers good scalability and has the ability to integrate with various systems and services

One area where k6 could improve is by introducing a GUI similar to JMeter. While k6 is a powerful tool for performance testing, it leans heavily towards coding. Having a GUI, even if it is a low-code approach, could make it more accessible to a broader audience. It would be beneficial to strike a balance where basic tasks can be performed graphically through a user-friendly interface, while still allowing the flexibility for more complex operations through code, similar to how JMeter operates. This could enhance the user experience and make k6 more approachable for those who may not be as comfortable with scripting.

Read full review

VictorHorescu

Chief Executive Officer at iqst

Ability to test almost every tool in the companies I enter and performs well in a distributed environment

It would be beneficial if LoadRunner could optimize resource usage, especially for protocols that require significant resources, like TrueClient, which interacts directly with the UI. If they could improve resource usage, like ingest or for the load generator, using less CPU or RAM memory, that would be great. That's where I have problems. In real time, when they ask for 5,000 or 10,000 concurrent users, I have to provision a lot of virtual machines to define this load. Then there are situations with certain platforms, especially document management platforms, where the technology is so weird that normal LoadRunner protocols cannot detect it. So, in that case, I have to use that special TruClient protocol. I have to use the TruClient protocol, which actually clicks on the object. Despite the SQL technology, I can still create a script and test for performance. So what I would appreciate a lot is if this protocol would require less resources on a normal virtual machine. I can use fewer concurrent users with TruClient protocols as opposed to almost one hundred with HTTP/HTML. As opposed to many more with HTTP/HTML from, let's say, JMeter. So, optimization at that level for resource consumption by OpenText would be much appreciated.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In our company, various teams use BlazeMeter, particularly appreciating its cloud license software, which supports up to 5,000 users. BlazeMeter's cloud capabilities allow us to load test or simulate traffic from any location worldwide, such as Europe, North America, South America, Australia, and even specific cities like Delhi. So, with one cloud license, we can simulate user load from various locations globally."

"They have good support documentation and when we have contacted them, they helped to guide us."

"It has helped us simulate heavy load situations so we can fix performance issues ahead of time."

"One key advantage of using BlazeMeter is that it does not require me to manage my own infrastructure."

"BlazeMeter's most valuable feature is its cloud-based platform for performance testing."

"Running from the cloud with load distribution, exhibiting load from different geo-regions. Generating the load from different cloud regions is the best feature."

"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that BlazeMeter provides easy access to its users while also ensuring that its reporting functionalities are good."

"The product's initial setup phase was simple."

More BlazeMeter pros

"The tool's big advantage is that it is more performance-test oriented for experienced testers who know what they are doing. In a normal working setup, performance engineers frequently work with DevOps and development teams. For these teams, k6 Open Source's syntax is much simpler and easier to understand and apply in the working process."

"The standout feature of k6 is its strong focus on API performance testing."

"LoadRunner Enterprise's most valuable features are load simulation and creating correlation for parameters."

"We can measure metrics like hits per second and detect deviations or issues through graphs. We can filter out response times based on timings and identify spikes in the database or AWS reports."

"LoadRunner Enterprise's best feature is the detailed reporting structure."

"The most valuable aspect of Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is the overall support it has for a lot of different applications and defined domains."

"The host performance testing of any application using a host/controller is the most valuable feature."

"This is a product that has a lot of capabilities and is the most mature tool of its kind in the market."

"With Performance Center, the version upgrade is easy. You just have to roll out the new patch or the new version."

"The most beneficial features of the solution are flexibility and versatility in their performance."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pros

Cons

"BlazeMeter does not provide integration with the Aternity tool."

"Version controlling of the test cases and the information, the ability to compare the current version and the previous version within Runscope would be really nice. The history shows who made the changes, but it doesn't compare the changes."

"The should be some visibility into load testing. I'd like to capture items via snapshots."

"The performance could be better. When reviewing finished cases, it sometimes takes a while for BlazeMeter to load. That has improved recently, but it's still a problem with unusually large test cases. The same goes for editing test cases. When editing test cases, it starts to take a long time to open those action groups and stuff."

"The product could improve in areas such as mobile testing and the integration of AI analytics."

"The seamless integration with mobiles could be improved."

"BlazeMeter should improve or make available some features out of the box that JMeter requires customization for."

"My only complaint is about the technical support, where sometimes I found that they would not read into and understand the details of my question before answering it."

More BlazeMeter cons

"One area where k6 could improve is by introducing a GUI similar to JMeter."

"The debugging feature needs to include graphs."

"The solution is a very expensive tool when compared with other tools."

"The technical support offered by the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"They need to focus on minimizing the cost."

"They had wanted to change the GUI to improve the look and feel. However, since that time, we see a lot of hanging issues."

"I think better support for cloud-based load generators would help. For example, integrate with Amazon AWS so you can quickly spin up a load generator in the cloud, use it, spin it down."

"I believe the data that demonstrates the automated correlations should be corrected."

"I have seen some users report some issues, but I have personally not had any issues."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product isn't cheap, but it isn't the most expensive on the market. During our proof of concept, we discovered that you get what you pay for; we found a cheaper solution we tested to be full of bugs. Therefore, we are willing to pay the higher price tag for the quality BlazeMeter offers."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"It is an averagely priced product."

"The solution is free and open source."

"My company has opted for a pay-as-you-go model, so we don't make use of the free version of the product."

"It's consumption-based pricing but with a ceiling. They're called CVUs, or consumption variable units. We can use API testing, GUI testing, and test data, but everything gets converted into CVUs, so we are free to use the platform in its entirety without getting bogged down by a license for certain testing areas. We know for sure how much we are going to spend."

"The product pricing is reasonable."

"The licensing fees are billed on a monthly basis and they cost approximately $100 for the basic plan."

More BlazeMeter pricing and cost advice

Information not available

"It is a bit expensive, especially for smaller organizations, but over-all it can save you money."

"We are content with the pricing and find it to be reasonable in terms of value for money."

"It is a bit expensive when compared with other tools."

"The prices would differ depending on the number of licenses you need. I wouldn't maybe compare it to any other tools. I rate the price as seven out of ten."

"The tool is very expensive."

"The price is a bit too high."

"We got a very good deal. We are happy with that. We have 5,000 licenses."

"I have not been directly involved in price negotiations but my understanding is that while the cost is a little bit high, it provides good value for the money."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	22

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	73

Questions from the Community

How does BlazeMeter compare with Apache JMeter?

Blazemeter is a continuous testing platform that provides scriptless test automation. It unifies functional and perfo...

See all answers

What do you like most about BlazeMeter?

It has a unique programming dashboard that is very user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BlazeMeter?

BlazeMeter's pricing depends on the type of account used. They offer multiple account types, with cost variations bas...

See all answers

What do you like most about k6 Open Source?

The standout feature of k6 is its strong focus on API performance testing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with k6 Open Source?

One area where k6 could improve is by introducing a GUI similar to JMeter. While k6 is a powerful tool for performanc...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for k6 Open Source?

k6 Open Source is a powerful tool, especially for API-level performance testing. Its integration capabilities and eas...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

Now that LoadRunner integrates with Dynatrace and other monitoring tools, it simplifies the process of integration in...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

The price of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise), including pricing, licensing, and s...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

The analytics and reporting features can be improved, though they are good enough. If you have expertise, you can man...

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs BlazeMeter

Compared 44% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs BlazeMeter

Compared 17% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs BlazeMeter

Compared 16% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs BlazeMeter

Compared 6% of the time

Akamai CloudTest vs BlazeMeter

Compared 4% of the time

More BlazeMeter Competitors

Tricentis NeoLoad vs k6 Open Source

Compared 32% of the time

Selenium HQ vs k6 Open Source

Compared 14% of the time

Apache JMeter vs k6 Open Source

Compared 11% of the time

Akamai CloudTest vs k6 Open Source

Compared 8% of the time

More k6 Open Source Competitors

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 31% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 19% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Silk Performer vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BlazeMeter

September 2025

Download BlazeMeter product report

Buyer's Guide

Load Testing Tools

September 2025

Download k6 Open Source product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

September 2025

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) report

Download OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) product report

Also Known As

JMeter Cloud

Load Impact

Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Performance Center, HPE Performance Center

Overview

BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery.

The rapidly growing BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.

Perforce

Load Impact offers three main features:

Automated testing - Integrates into your CD pipeline with CI plug-ins or opt for full control with API/SDKs.
API testing - a powerful scripting environment where you can create as simple or complex API scenarios as you need.
Web & web app testing - easily load test your website or web app. Record user scenarios using our Chrome extension or proxy recorder and configure a test with just a few clicks - no programming required.

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) provides robust performance testing capabilities with scalable and user-friendly tools. It supports multiple protocols for diverse applications, ensuring reliable and comprehensive performance metrics for organizations.

Designed for extensive performance testing, OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering offers advanced integration features and global testing capabilities. Users value its ease of scheduling, detailed analysis, and efficient resource management. It simulates real-world scenarios to deliver valuable metrics across industries. Its intuitive interface, while needing smoother navigation, aligns with its flexibility and versatility. Enhanced reporting and cloud-based integration, especially with AWS, are potential growth areas alongside improved third-party tool integration and technical support.

What are the key features of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering?

Reporting Capabilities: Offers detailed and customizable reports for insightful data analysis.
Scalability: Supports testing with thousands of concurrent users for robust application performance validation.
Integration Features: Provides seamless integration options for a cohesive testing environment.
Global Execution: Enables worldwide test execution with ease and flexibility.
Protocol Support: Accommodates a wide range of protocols for versatile application testing.

What benefits should users expect from using OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering?

Improved Performance Metrics: Detailed insights into application stability and performance.
Cost Management: Particularly with enhanced AWS integration, helps manage infrastructure costs.
Industry Versatility: Applicable across sectors like banking, healthcare, and retail.
Flexibility: Adapts to cloud, web, and ERP applications with robust scripting and testing options.

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering is implemented in banking, healthcare, and retail industries, assisting in load, stress, and performance testing. Organizations utilize its capabilities for validating web, API, cloud, ERP, and Citrix applications, ensuring reliability with comprehensive metrics for large-scale user handling.

OpenText

Sample Customers

DIRECTV, GAP, MIT, NBCUniversal, Pfizer, StubHub

rackspace, salesforce.com, IBM, servicenow, Nasdaq, JWT

Hexaware, British Sky Broadcasting, JetBlue

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Tricentis, OpenText and others in Load Testing Tools. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.