BlackBerry Workspaces vs OpenText Extended ECM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
BlackBerry Logo
80 views|45 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
3,975 views|3,070 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BlackBerry Workspaces and OpenText Extended ECM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Microsoft, Google and others in Content Collaboration Platforms.
To learn more, read our detailed Content Collaboration Platforms Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features are the ability to revoke rights after sending the document, and shoulder browsing protection."

More BlackBerry Workspaces Pros →

"It's a very good solution.""OpenText Extended ECM's most valuable features include permissions and security models. I also like the tool's ability to add metadata and use it to categorize information.""The solution's automatic document numbering, state management, and process flow are very useful features to go through the full cycle of the document.""An SAP user can store documents directly into OpenText without a connector.""We also have a module on top of the Content Server called WebReports that has been one of the things that helped us facilitate the workflow and give managers good reporting and visibility into where everything is. Being able to use that on top of the Content Server was a big help.""The integration of a document management platform with many other applications, e.g. SAP, SuccessFactors, Salesforce, SharePoint, etc.""Smart Viewing videos are most valuable for the end users. The end users like the look and feel of Smart View. It's similar to SharePoint, with the latest HTML5 features, filters, and everything. It's like online shopping.""The ability to add metadata and use that to categorize information is a valuable feature of OpenText Extended ECM."

More OpenText Extended ECM Pros →

Cons
"I would like to see workflow implementation, as well as a lite version for non-business users."

More BlackBerry Workspaces Cons →

"User interface needs improvement (at least in the version we are using, desktop client).""We are looking for new, advanced UI features. Currently, the UI does not look great.""The architecture needs improvement, as it's complex.""Pricing could be improved and the stability or the performance needs improvement, which is very important.""When it comes to addressing complex use cases, three or four years ago, we ended up purchasing an additional OpenText product called AppWorks because we started to run into some limitations with the workflow that can be done in Extended ECM. It was a little limiting, so we ended up getting another product.""The solution's performance, stability, and consistency could be improved.""The annotation tool needs improvement. In other tools, such as Hyland OnBase, you can easily do annotation. You can easily merge documents. You can easily compare documents, whereas with OpenText, it seems to be a challenge.""OpenText Extended ECM's user interface could be improved."

More OpenText Extended ECM Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The licensing is not that complex for the core products, but it becomes more complicated for some additional modules."
  • "Both Open Text ECM and IBM File share are expensive."
  • "It is a little more expensive than our previous solution, but because of the fact that it has become a rallying point for different groups to come under, it might end up paying off better in the long run by not having seven siloed solutions. Even though this one solution is a little pricey, it might eliminate other ones."
  • "The tool's pricing is confusing to the end customer."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "OpenText Extended ECM is an expensive solution."
  • "The product is pricey."
  • "OpenText Extended ECM's pricing and licensing are aggressive and confusing for the end customer."
  • More OpenText Extended ECM Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Content Collaboration Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
    769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:We also have a module on top of the Content Server called WebReports that has been one of the things that helped us facilitate the workflow and give managers good reporting and visibility into where… more »
    Top Answer:It is a little more expensive than our previous solution, but because of the fact that it has become a rallying point for different groups to come under, it might end up paying off better in the long… more »
    Top Answer:We make iterations on it. Every year, they usually ask for some small things. Overall, they are pretty happy with it. Being the IT person here, I do think there are areas for improvement, but both for… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    80
    Comparisons
    45
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    3,975
    Comparisons
    3,070
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    692
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    WatchDox
    OpenText Content Suite Platform
    Learn More
    Overview

    BlackBerry Workspaces provides secure file storage, synchronization and sharing for every use case and budget. Whether you need to enable personal productivity, facilitate team collaboration, or mobilize and transform your entire business, BlackBerry Workspaces is the best choice for secure file collaboration.

    OpenText Extended ECM (formerly OpenText Content Suite Platform) is an enterprise content management platform that securely governs the information lifecycle by integrating with leading enterprise applications, such as SAP, Microsoft 365, Salesforce and SAP SuccessFactors. Bringing content and processes together, Extended ECM provides access to information when and where it’s needed, improves decision-making and drives operational effectiveness.

    Sample Customers
    QIC, Evides
    ATCO Australia, MSIG Asia, Orica, Salt River Project
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Energy/Utilities Company18%
    Manufacturing Company18%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government13%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Content Collaboration Platforms
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Microsoft, Google and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: April 2024.
    769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    BlackBerry Workspaces is ranked 27th in Content Collaboration Platforms while OpenText Extended ECM is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 18 reviews. BlackBerry Workspaces is rated 7.0, while OpenText Extended ECM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of BlackBerry Workspaces writes "Facilitates monitoring and control of our repositories, but would benefit from the inclusion of workflows". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Extended ECM writes "Serves as a single source of support for the company but has scalability issues". BlackBerry Workspaces is most compared with Google Cloud Storage, whereas OpenText Extended ECM is most compared with OpenText Documentum, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and Alfresco.

    We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.