Bizagi vs Make comparison

Bizagi and Make are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Bizagi is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.4, while Make is ranked #31 with an average rating of 8.0. Bizagi holds a 6.2% mindshare in PA, compared to Make’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Bizagi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Make users who would recommend it.

Bizagi

Read 81 Bizagi reviews

3,008 Views
67 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Make

Read 4 Make reviews

327 Views
48 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Bizagi

Make

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Bizagi and Make are competitive products in the BPM and workflow automation space. Data comparisons show that Bizagi may have the upper hand in ease of use and process management, while Make is known for flexibility and integration capabilities.

Features: Bizagi's features include comprehensive process modeling, low-code development, and powerful analytics. Make's strengths are in seamless integrations, automation workflows, and scalability for complex tasks.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bizagi provides a structured deployment model with clarity and documentation, alongside accessible customer service and support. Make offers a quick deployment strategy with cloud-based solutions and less structured customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Bizagi offers competitive pricing focused on long-term ROI through enhanced process efficiency. Make provides a flexible pricing model that scales based on usage, increasing ROI through rapid integration and reduced time to market.

To learn more, read our detailed Bizagi vs. Make Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bizagi vs. Make

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bizagi

Ranking in Process Automation

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (4th), Business Process Management (BPM) (5th), Rapid Application Development Software (16th), Low-Code Development Platforms (11th), No-Code Development Platforms (5th), Process Mining (6th)

Make

Ranking in Process Automation

31st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Bizagi is 6.2%, down from 8.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Make is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Paparao Nadipineni

Architect at Evoke

Enables budget review efficiency with open source advantages and workflow orchestration

Definitely, right now, it is purely open source, and we don't have much community support. If they add a few more capabilities like AIML and DocGen AI, these features would be good. Reporting capabilities can be improved more, and community support should be increased. Otherwise, people cannot onboard that particular technology easily.

Read full review

Yaniv Ivgi

Business Owner at Chatbot-sales

An affordable cloud solution for automation and data manipulation

Make has a single IP. We cannot use a single IP because of the security. There are a lot of crashes when you work manually. Also, they need to provide more models. When you have an error, Make should inform them with guidance before you make the mistake. There is a lot of data you can confuse.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"With the appropriate governance framework, properly trained business analysts can be empowered to design and build business solutions themselves."

"It is easy to use and easy to learn. It is also fully compatible with BPMN virtual tool. Bizagi is very fast in responding to and fixing the issues."

"The most valuable feature is that it is compatible with Visual Studio and .NET, and we can program it. Its speed is very good, and it is also stable and easy to deploy."

"The tool helps to improve business processes and have better KPIs. Also, it is easy to use. Our developers find it easy to learn."

"The most valuable features of the solution are the process modeling part and process simulation."

"I find Bizagi so user friendly. I also think that its modeling abilities are great and it's easy to teach them to new users."

"Bizagi is flexible. I can share things with other consultants because it is the most commonly used software in my community. It has been a great and good resource for us in making sure that we adhere to the process."

"It is open source."

More Bizagi pros

"Make saves a lot of time, and I have created really complex scenarios in Make."

"Make's front-end interface, the modular interface that it has, drag-and-drop interface, is very easy to understand, use, and integrate."

"The most valuable features of Make are the additional options when compared to other similar solutions. For example, with Google my business, you can only do certain things with Zapier, whereas with Make, you can do a little bit more."

Cons

"It is difficult to drive ROI on types of processes involving complex business rules."

"In business process mapping, you have pools and dark pools. I don't see that Bizagi differentiates between a regular pool and a dark pool."

"In terms of what needs improvement, the costs can be lowered."

"If they add a few more capabilities like AIML and DocGen AI, these features would be good."

"The solution's interface could be a bit more user-friendly and I would like to see more integrations with other Office products, not just Office 365."

"Bizagi needs a way to define categories such as process groups like the APQC framework, PCF, and handle the processes within it."

"Sometimes, when your process is big with multiple lanes, the product will freeze the issue noticed on multiple laptops, not a single PC."

"For the small business, this is very bad because it is still fragmented. The licensing policy should be more flexible and small company oriented. In micro-small companies, there should only be one or two. That's not the problem. Maybe it is too flexible, there are so many pieces that you need to put together. When you have a small business, it can be a little complicated, not so easy."

More Bizagi cons

"The pricing of Make at this point is through operations consumption, and it becomes really expensive in certain scenarios when iterations are involved."

"Make can be a bit difficult to use for new users, but for someone with technical knowledge and some coding skills, it becomes manageable, especially with Make's great UI features that really help."

"The pricing of Make at this point is through operations consumption, and it becomes really expensive in certain scenarios when iterations are involved."

"Make could improve the ease of use, it can be more complicated than other solutions. There are a lot of elements that are more technical than in other solutions."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company uses the free version of the product."

"The product must improve its cost."

"We use the free version of the solution because the price is in dollars, making it expensive for where we are in Brazil."

"I was using the free version."

"The pricing model is good; I believe it's free for up to 20 users, and then they start charging. I hear the solution can get quite expensive, however."

"The modeling part of the software is free. Most of the time, it is used for this purpose."

"I think that its price is reasonable."

"The Bizagi modeler can be downloaded free of charge."

More Bizagi pricing and cost advice

"The price of Make is approximately $20 per month for the platform."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How easy is it to migrate process flow charts (modeled using tools like Visio) into Bizagi?

I have been using Bizagi with a major project for a state government agency for about four years now. It is pretty straightforward to load in files that are BPMN 2.0 compliant. The option to load V...

See all answers

What do you like most about Bizagi?

The natural notation is the best feature of Bizagi because it makes it compatible with other products.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bizagi?

Bizagi's pricing is very aggressive, and it was one of the reasons we chose it. It was less expensive than some of the other tools.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Make?

I find the pricing, setup costs, and licensing costs of Make to be reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Make?

I don't think there's anything else Make needs, but one improvement could be the addition of no-code steps that can be used within Make, similar to what Zapier offers with its own actions.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Make?

As an entrepreneur and a freelancer who also runs my own agency, I use Make to set up automations for my clients. Recently, the most use cases are of AI agent or AI calling agent, but when I starte...

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Bizagi

Compared 24% of the time

Visio vs Bizagi

Compared 21% of the time

Lucidchart vs Bizagi

Compared 6% of the time

Bonita vs Bizagi

Compared 5% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Bizagi

Compared 5% of the time

More Bizagi Competitors

Camunda vs Make

Compared 57% of the time

Appian vs Make

Compared 30% of the time

Tray.io vs Make

Compared 13% of the time

More Make Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bizagi

June 2025

Download Bizagi product report

Buyer's Guide

Process Automation

June 2025

Download Make product report

Also Known As

No data available

Integromat

Overview

Bizagi’s industry-leading low-code process automation platform connects people, applications, robots, and information. As the most business-friendly and flexible solution on the market, Bizagi enables true collaboration between business and IT, delivering faster adoption and success. Fuelled by a community of 1 million users, Bizagi powers over 1,000 organizations worldwide including Adidas, BAE Systems, and Old Mutual. For more information visit www.bizagi.com

Bizagi

Visualize everything you do

Make lets you visually build workflows to solve complex problems - the way you imagine them in your mind.

Drag and drop to connect apps
Use the playful drag-and-drop builder to connect apps in a few clicks, and build workflows called scenarios.

Design infinite workflows
Build scenarios with as many steps or apps as you need.

Watch data flow in real time
Build your scenario and watch it run in real time. Schedule your scenario to run instantly or whenever you need it.

Make

Sample Customers

adidas, Audi, BNP Paribas, Deutsche Post DHL & many more - 500+ customer globally.

Buan Consulting, Armadia

Buyer's Guide

Bizagi vs. Make

June 2025

Free Report: Bizagi vs. Make

Find out what your peers are saying about Bizagi vs. Make and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bizagi vs. Make report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.