BizTalk Server vs Bizagi comparison

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Bizagi Logo
4,330 views|3,766 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
677 views|290 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Bizagi and BizTalk Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed BizTalk Server vs. Bizagi Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The initial setup is super simple.""The documentation capabilities are very good. Very structured documents and process versions are valuable features, and being able to communicate that to our customers is also a very good feature. It has a good balance between the effort and the result. So, you don't need to be too detailed. You can document while you are modeling, which is a very good feature.""In Bizagi, all of the features are valuable.""Agility, reverse engineering, customized portal web, help desk and user guides, easy deployment, simple to modify.""Bizagi is a very useful tool because it does not require you to program. The user logic is very easy to understand even for people who are not engineers or developers.""Bizagi is flexible. I can share things with other consultants because it is the most commonly used software in my community. It has been a great and good resource for us in making sure that we adhere to the process.""Great mapping feature that's easy to use.""The visualizations and attachments provided by the product are valuable."

More Bizagi Pros →

"The most valuable feature is its reliability and stability. The first version of BizTalk was released in 2000, and many companies still use it. It was stable until 2013 when we had support.""The tool's most valuable feature is its integration with the banks. Its messaging and routing capabilities are good.""Compared to the current solutions I use, like Azure Logic Apps and other cloud services, BizTalk was far better and more reliable.""We can handle a large number of messages without any issues, ensuring that everything runs smoothly.""The most valuable feature of BizTalk Server is that it will turn XML into flexible transactions.""BIzTalk's integration with Visual Studio is the most valuable feature of this product.""Essentially, you can do whatever you like with these systems, and you do not have to take care about the scaling because if one server is overloaded, it just forwards the message to the next server, even if it were designated to a specific server. It weeds out the messages according to the load. If you want to scale it, you just add new servers.""I rate the tool's stability a nine out of ten."

More BizTalk Server Pros →

"The on-premise software has some bugs.""It would be useful if we can connect Bizagi to other solutions, such as a local financial solution or Power BI. It would also be good and helpful to be able to connect Bizagi to some services solutions. It should also support right-to-left languages, such as Arabic.""Also, the tool sometimes feels not so mature when we find random deploy errors from testing to production environment.""It is difficult to drive ROI on types of processes involving complex business rules.""It should provide the ability to create a simple application. It can be used for database modeling diagrams and forms, but it should also support CRUD, that is, create, read, update and delete.""One thing that I don't like very much is related to integration: we have to develop some connectors... I would need a connector that connects to a REST service and that uses client ID in secret... They provide the means to develop a connector and use it, but they should implement this because REST services are among the most used protocols for web services.""Can be difficult for new users.""It works slowly on the cloud, sometimes."

More Bizagi Cons →

"It's a complex product because you have many degrees of freedom to connect different parts together. Whether it's sensible or not, is up to you, but the machine does allow it. But because of the vast degrees of freedom, it's complex.""BizTalk Server is an outdated legacy system that does not support messaging.""The deployment could be simplified.""The product could be improved in monitoring, managing, and support functionalities.""BizTalk lacks native cloud support. BizTalk doesn't offer in-built support for cloud. We need to use third-party adapters to connect it to cloud services.""BizTalk is in the past, Microsoft is not going to evolve it any further or add any new features.""The product's deployment can be quicker""It's an on-premises system, requiring physical servers for deployment. This is different from Azure; you don't need any servers with Azure. If you have a subscription, you can do whatever you want. There are unit restrictions based on the environment (like non-production vs. production) in BizTalk. You need physical servers and databases. In Azure, those are not required – it's all in the cloud."

More BizTalk Server Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is good value for money."
  • "For the prices, we didn't try a negotiations about licensing or pricing, but if i can say a word about this, I find Bizagi prices to be well thought out."
  • "The modeler itself is free. For the whole BPM suite, there are other options that may be better."
  • "It is on par with other BPM tools, but not as expensive as Pega nor Appian."
  • "If they can freeze the pricing in a contract, I advise them to do so."
  • "I think that its price is reasonable."
  • "This solution would be expensive for a company that has a lot of users."
  • "The Bizagi modeler can be downloaded free of charge."
  • More Bizagi Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The cost will depend on the client's requirements."
  • "BizTalk Server is cheap. I would rate its pricing a two out of five."
  • "Based on the knowledge, it is relatively cheaper than Azure Identity Services and cloud services in general."
  • "It was not cheap, but it was affordable."
  • "BizTalk Server is not freeware. There's a significant licensing cost involved. Be sure you will actually utilize its features fully."
  • More BizTalk Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    771,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I have been using Bizagi with a major project for a state government agency for about four years now. It is pretty straightforward to load in files that are BPMN 2.0 compliant. The option to load… more »
    Top Answer:The natural notation is the best feature of Bizagi because it makes it compatible with other products.
    Top Answer:The tool's most valuable feature is its integration with the banks. Its messaging and routing capabilities are good.
    Top Answer:The product's deployment can be quicker
    Top Answer:I recommend the product since it has helped us with verification and messaging. I rate it a seven out of ten.
    out of 66 in Process Automation
    Average Words per Review
    out of 66 in Process Automation
    Average Words per Review
    Learn More

    Bizagi’s industry-leading low-code process automation platform connects people, applications, robots, and information. As the most business-friendly and flexible solution on the market, Bizagi enables true collaboration between business and IT, delivering faster adoption and success. Fuelled by a community of 1 million users, Bizagi powers over 1,000 organizations worldwide including Adidas, BAE Systems, and Old Mutual. For more information visit

    Connects systems both inside and across organizations, exchange data and orchestrate business processes across multiple systems.
    Sample Customers
    adidas, Audi, BNP Paribas, Deutsche Post DHL & many more - 500+ customer globally.
    Centrebet, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, QualCare, Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, DTEK, Allscripts, United BioSource, Hogg Robinson
    Top Industries
    Recruiting/Hr Firm8%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Educational Organization8%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Company Size
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise34%
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise61%
    Small Business43%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    BizTalk Server vs. Bizagi
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about BizTalk Server vs. Bizagi and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Bizagi is ranked 7th in Process Automation with 78 reviews while BizTalk Server is ranked 17th in Process Automation with 12 reviews. Bizagi is rated 8.4, while BizTalk Server is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Bizagi writes "A flexible, customizable solution that reduced time to market, but the UI and customer support could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of BizTalk Server writes "For production environments, messages are easily stored within the MessageBox database and offers multiple deployment methods ". Bizagi is most compared with Camunda, Visio, Bonita, Microsoft Power Apps and ARIS BPA, whereas BizTalk Server is most compared with IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, SAP Process Orchestration, Camunda, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and Oracle BPEL. See our BizTalk Server vs. Bizagi report.

    See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.