Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bacula Enterprise vs Cohesity Data Cloud comparison

Bacula Systems and Cohesity are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Bacula Systems is ranked #25 with an average rating of 10.0, while Cohesity is ranked #40 with an average rating of 8.7. Bacula Systems holds a 1.0% mindshare in BRS, compared to Cohesity’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Bacula Systems users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Cohesity users who would recommend it.
Bacula Enterprise
Read 10 Bacula Enterprise reviews
  • 1,044 Views
  • 904 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
Cohesity Data Cloud
Read 8 Cohesity Data Cloud reviews
  • 432 Views
  • 261 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Bacula Enterprise and Cohesity Data Cloud are two prominent data management solutions. While Bacula Enterprise is favored for its pricing and support, Cohesity Data Cloud is considered to offer better overall value due to its extensive features.

Features: Bacula Enterprise users highlight its robust backup capabilities, flexibility in deployment options, and lower setup costs. Cohesity Data Cloud is praised for its comprehensive data protection, secondary storage capabilities, and cloud integration, making Cohesity more feature-rich.

Room for Improvement:Bacula Enterprise users suggest enhancements in reporting tools, cloud integration, and a need for a more intuitive UI. Cohesity Data Cloud users mention the need for better pricing models, improved data migration tools, and quicker support response times.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Bacula Enterprise is reported to have a straightforward deployment and reliable customer support. Cohesity Data Cloud also offers easy deployment but receives higher praise for customer service quality. Cohesity's superior customer engagement adds to its appeal.

Pricing and ROI:Bacula Enterprise is noted for lower setup costs and an appealing ROI. Cohesity Data Cloud, while more expensive, is seen as a valuable investment due to its rich feature set and quick ROI. The higher cost of Cohesity is justified by its broader offering.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Bacula Enterprise vs. Cohesity Data Cloud Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Bacula Enterprise vs. Cohesity Data Cloud
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bacula Enterprise
Ranking in Backup and Recovery
25th
Ranking in Cloud Backup
18th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Cohesity Data Cloud
Ranking in Backup and Recovery
40th
Ranking in Cloud Backup
34th
Average Rating
9.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Data Management Platforms (DMP) (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Bacula Enterprise is 1.0%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cohesity Data Cloud is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Backup and Recovery
 

Featured Reviews

Davilson Aguiar - PeerSpot reviewer
Very cost-effective and well organized with good compression
It could improve its interface or offer a specific screen for the manager of the company. A managerial user who wants more information beyond the operational technician should be able to access it. It could include greater transparency regarding the volume of data trafficked on the network, as well as the expectation of deduplication. A more practical strategy could come with a backup policy model as a suggestion for both large and small companies. A simple suggestion is to visually implement the backup time as far as your physical media.
Read full review
AmarpreetSingh - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers improved data protection and security with indirect ROI
The pricing of the Cloud is on the higher side, and it should be cost-effective enough to compete with native solutions. Currently, Cohesity Cloud seems very costly compared to native backups. Although this is an emerging tool and there is room for growth, it needs to mature further. There is an AI feature, however, it is still in the development phase and requires substantial improvements.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It works great and it provides you with several standard tools to restore your backup, even after a big failure."
"The most valuable features are the special plugins such as SAP HANA databases, Microsoft SQL, and various types of virtualization."
"It brought many advantages - such as the learning curve being very light."
"The solution has extensive documentation and a very active community."
"It can be used in virtually any environment we have onsite."
"It is easy to scale Bacula Enterprise even if your system is growing tremendously in data and servers."
"Bacula is pretty stable."
"Bacula is very solid, very stable, and very scalable."
"The clone feature is very nice. You can restore workloads onto Cohesity's storage, which is also nice to have when you don't have enough space to restore on the server."
"The hyper-converged architecture and scalability are hugely important for growing service companies."
"It is easy to install and use."
"Our data center size occupancy for Cohesity appliance is reduced by 70% when we installed Cohesity."
"I find the most important feature to be data protection."
"We use Cohesity Helios primarily in our data management strategy for backup and reporting."
"I definitely recommend this tool to others due to its simplicity, security, features, and flexibility."
"Its big data and archive data features are the features that I have found most valuable. I can use it in a big virtual environment."
More Cohesity Data Cloud pros
 

Cons

"We would like to see an improvement in the functionality of the GUI."
"We are looking for a unique interface that can rule both enterprise and open source editions. Such a thing does not yet exist."
"The initial setup could be a bit easier."
"Bacula needs a graphical user interface because, for administrators, the command-line interface is okay, but for the average user it is not very easy."
"A more user-friendly interface (GUI) can be developed."
"It could improve its interface or offer a specific screen for the manager of the company."
"Easier setup and configuration, perhaps including a GUI, would be an improvement."
"Many features have been converted to commercial licensing, which restricts their availability."
"The pricing of the Cloud is on the higher side, and it should be cost-effective enough to compete with native solutions."
"It has never been touted as a tier-one storage platform, and that would be a benefit. They are currently working on solving that issue."
"The initial setup can be complex, depending on the environment."
"In terms of functionality, Helios has been effective, but sometimes it doesn't show the exact cluster name for backups."
"The pricing of the Cloud is on the higher side, and it should be cost-effective enough to compete with native solutions."
"There is limited support for legacy systems, which is something that could be improved."
"Their documentation portal is not up to date for newer releases and I strongly recommend Cohesity to increase their efforts on the documentation portal."
"The primary drawback is the need to transfer large amounts of data to the cloud via an internet connection, requiring significant bandwidth."
More Cohesity Data Cloud cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a perpetual license."
"This is an open-source solution."
"It's priced properly for the market."
"Regarding pricing, it's very costly and I rate it a four."
"Competing products sometimes use deceptive marketing to make their products seem a lot cheaper. Comparing apples-to-apples, DataPlatform wins out."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
20%
University
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bacula Enterprise?
Bacula is more expensive than various other solutions. It’s almost completely commercial now. Products like Veeam software are much more expensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Bacula Enterprise?
Many features have been converted to commercial licensing, which restricts their availability.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Bacula Enterprise?
The last scenario in which I used Bacula was for a customer who needed some open-source tool which could support encryption at that time. We managed to convince the customer to use Bacula to deploy...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cohesity DataPlatform?
While Cohesity Data Cloud is more costly in the long term compared to physical tapes, it offers value by meeting compliance needs and providing protection against ransomware attacks. The pricing is...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Cohesity Imanis Data?
The primary drawback is the need to transfer large amounts of data to the cloud via an internet connection, requiring significant bandwidth. Reading data from the cloud can incur additional costs, ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Cohesity Imanis Data?
The primary use case for Cohesity Data Cloud is to offer an additional layer of protection for backup data, which I can restore if needed. It is a managed service that allows me to set up and confi...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Bareos vs Bacula Enterprise Logo
Bareos vs Bacula Enterprise
Compared 51% of the time
UrBackup vs Bacula Enterprise Logo
UrBackup vs Bacula Enterprise
Compared 17% of the time
Veeam Data Platform vs Bacula Enterprise Logo
Veeam Data Platform vs Bacula Enterprise
Compared 13% of the time
Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) vs Bacula Enterprise Logo
Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) vs Bacula Enterprise
Compared 4% of the time
QNAP Backup Solution vs Bacula Enterprise Logo
QNAP Backup Solution vs Bacula Enterprise
Compared 3% of the time
More Bacula Enterprise Competitors
Commvault Cloud vs Cohesity Data Cloud Logo
Commvault Cloud vs Cohesity Data Cloud
Compared 21% of the time
Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Cohesity Data Cloud Logo
Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Cohesity Data Cloud
Compared 18% of the time
ExaGrid Tiered Backup Storage vs Cohesity Data Cloud Logo
ExaGrid Tiered Backup Storage vs Cohesity Data Cloud
Compared 16% of the time
Palantir Foundry vs Cohesity Data Cloud Logo
Palantir Foundry vs Cohesity Data Cloud
Compared 13% of the time
Veeam Data Platform vs Cohesity Data Cloud Logo
Veeam Data Platform vs Cohesity Data Cloud
Compared 13% of the time
More Cohesity Data Cloud Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Backup and Recovery
April 2025
Bacula Enterprise reportDownload Bacula Enterprise product report
Buyer's Guide
Cohesity Data Cloud
May 2025
Cohesity Data Cloud reportDownload Cohesity Data Cloud product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Imanis Data, DataPlatform, Cohesity Helios
 

Overview

Bacula Enterprise is a highly scalable, especially robust and secure data backup and recovery software. Its unique low cost subscription model empowers data centers to truly escape data volume price traps. With a high degree of flexibility and customizability, Bacula offers native integration with a wide range of hypervisors, databases, file systems, cloud interfaces and containers. High numbers of enterprise organizations worldwide (incl. NASA, Bank of Austria, Swisscom or Sky PLC) have adopted Bacula Enterprise backup software in mission critical environments because of its advanced features and ability to handle high data volume at very low cost.

Bacula Systems

Consolidate your backups, file shares, object stores and data for dev/test and analytics on a web-scale data management platform.

Cohesity
 

Sample Customers

NASA, SwissCom, Navisite, Turner Studios, Bank Austria, Caixa Bank, SdV Plurimedia, Leibniz University Hannover, Zeta Global, Tricore, NetLog, Siemens, LocaWeb, wbsGo, itesys, Queens School of Computing, Escrypt.
Navis, 1st Security Bank, Brown University, WestLotto
Buyer's Guide
Bacula Enterprise vs. Cohesity Data Cloud
April 2025
Free Report: Bacula Enterprise vs. Cohesity Data Cloud
Find out what your peers are saying about Bacula Enterprise vs. Cohesity Data Cloud and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Bacula Enterprise vs. Cohesity Data Cloud report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors and best Cloud Backup vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.