Azure Web Application Firewall vs Link11 comparison

Link11 and Azure Web Application Firewall compete in the web application security market. Azure WAF appears to have the upper hand with its seamless integration within the Azure ecosystem and effective deployment options.

Features: Link11 shines with its user-friendly dashboard, customized support, and effective real-time malicious traffic management. It is appreciated for its strong DDoS protection and flexible rule management. Azure WAF is recognized for easy integration within Azure, quick deployment, and OWASP rule set filtering, offering real-time monitoring and custom rule-making capabilities. Its synergy with Microsoft services is beneficial for users with existing Azure deployments.

Room for Improvement: Link11 could enhance its change management processes and reporting features. Users point out the need for improved bot management and session monitoring, as well as a unified view for managing multiple instances. Azure WAF users suggest product documentation and support improvements for non-Microsoft products, along with better pricing clarity and more intuitive workflow settings.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Link11 supports cloud deployments with comprehensive technical support, praised for expert-level assistance during critical incidents. Azure WAF offers extensive support in public and hybrid cloud environments, with strong integration within the Azure suite and responsive technical support, featuring structured assistance for complex configurations.

Pricing and ROI: Link11 offers flexible pricing models, including pay-as-you-grow and inclusive support, which are well-suited for the educational sector. Users report alignment with service value. Azure WAF's pricing is competitive for enterprises, particularly those with existing Microsoft agreements, benefiting from transparent cost structures linked to service architecture. Both products demonstrate ROI, with Azure's integration offering additional financial efficiency.