Azure Site Recovery vs Quest NetVault Plus comparison

Microsoft and Quest Software are both solutions in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

Azure Site Recovery

Read 26 Azure Site Recovery reviews

889 Views
187 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Quest NetVault Plus

Read 12 Quest NetVault Plus reviews

554 Views
30 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Azure Site Recovery

Quest NetVault Plus

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Azure Site Recovery and Quest NetVault Plus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Site Recovery vs. Quest NetVault Plus Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Site Recovery vs. Quest NetVault Plus

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Site Recovery

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery as a Service (3rd)

Quest NetVault Plus

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (41st), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (25th)

Featured Reviews

RituparnaBhattacharya

Senior Infrastructure Engineer at MIC Global

The time-saving aspects allow us to write PowerShell scripts to automate failover processes

First of all, we initially faced a challenge as Azure Site Recovery was not supporting shared disk options on SQL clusters with VMs, which are important for a Windows cluster mode. Additionally, the setup is quite easy, only requiring the creation of a vault. Its time-saving aspects allow us to write PowerShell scripts to automate failover processes.

Read full review

Isa Safii

Senior System Engineer at PT. Virtus Technology Indonesia

Comprehensive data protection and reliable backup capabilities enable smooth disaster recovery operations

The features of Quest NetVault Plus ( /products/quest-netvault-plus-reviews ) that are most valuable include the ability to pick up and restore to tape servers and external hard disks. It allows us to pick up from devices and then restore to the same devices or external server storage. Additionally, the application supports scanning files for malware before backup operations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Despite the cost concerns and downtime management, I would still recommend Azure Site Recovery."

"The most valuable feature is the visibility of what is happening with our business as well as the good reporting and dashboards."

"Azure Site Recovery is an easy-to-use and fairly stable solution for disaster recovery."

"It’s native to Azure and does exactly what it’s designed to do—recover one site to another without creating all the VMs on that site. This helps reduce costs on the secondary site."

"Our primary use case is for disaster recovery and business continuity and disaster recovery (BCDR)."

"A major benefit is that you do not want to pay any more for huge costs to build a DR site."

"It is a very stable product and very scalable."

"Azure Site Recovery's automated file synchronization was a game-changer in managing legacy systems."

More Azure Site Recovery pros

"The solution allows us to block off our network and only give access to whatever we want."

"The interface is very user-friendly."

"The platform helps us with efficient QoreStor deduplication (DD) capabilities and configuration."

"Quest NetVault Plus has a high level of stability."

"The initial setup is straightforward. It's not that complicated. Deployment took maybe about 15 minutes."

"Having the web-based interface is important to us because we can access it from any computer in the network, rather than having it installed and available for use only on a specific one."

"Its dashboard is quite well done. When you log into the GUI, you can basically see everything you need to know. There is also the possibility to edit the view as you like, which is great."

"It has File and SQL backup, which is the main benefit for us."

More Quest NetVault Plus pros

Cons

"The tool should improve synchronization."

"The system did go down a couple of times, which impacted our operations. For stability, I would rate it a seven out of ten."

"we lack a straightforward method to automate the restart of services, which can be quite time-consuming."

"The product's performance is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The primary area for improvement in Azure Site Recovery is its pricing."

"When it runs, it runs well but when it doesn't run, the solution needs to make it clearer as to why and what the troubleshooting process is. All this would be possible if the error logging was streamlined a bit."

"It would be good if we could replicate the solution to multiple locations simultaneously because we are currently allowed to replicate to just a single location."

"I conveyed the feedback to the agent, suggesting an increase in the agent count in our VNS in the USA. I also addressed notification concerns, as some issues didn't trigger alerts during a recent call."

More Azure Site Recovery cons

"In the next version, I would like to see support for the MongoDB database. As it is now, there is no component that works with it and we cannot back the data up using NetVault."

"The stability of the solution is poor."

"The product’s SQL backup plugin needs improvement."

"The initial setup is a little complex."

"I would like to see the option of cloud-based management."

"There are command-line limitations. There is not a very strong possibility to work with the command line. The commands that are there are not that powerful, and you need to be very good at scripting, for example, in PowerShell or in Bash in case it is running on Linux systems. You need to combine a lot of commands together, and still, you will not get a great output that is presentable to others. You cannot work with it as easily."

"Improvements could be made in the deduplication and data management capabilities. There is also a need for better security measures, as security is critical to ensure backups are safe and free from malware."

"The interface can be improved. It should be more clear what features are available and make them easy to find."

More Quest NetVault Plus cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Azure Site Recovery is affordable."

"Azure Site Recovery is a very reasonably priced product."

"Azure Site Recovery is neither very expensive nor very cheap."

"The tool's licensing is yearly and not expensive."

"The tool is expensive. What is expensive to me might not be expensive to you. As I mentioned, we seek ways to reduce our costs. If the price goes down, that would be great. I rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten."

"I'm not sure about the Azure Site Recovery pricing, but my organization gets monthly bills from providers."

"They have a license to pay."

"It should have more straightforward billing. The billing was what got funky. It was really cheap. We would pay based on the usage. We paid around $225 a month for site-to-site replication."

"The price of our 12-month contract is approximately $1,500 AUD ($1,100 USD)."

"The tool is expensive."

"When we purchased four licenses, we were given a very good price. However, it is still on the high side when compared to some other vendors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Azure Site Recovery?

Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Site Recovery?

The price of Azure Site Recovery was reasonable compared to other data costs. It was not the expensive part of our costs, but, as always, there is room to make it cheaper.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Site Recovery?

The flexibility of Azure Site Recovery regarding integration with different IT environments is limited; it is purely an Azure platform service for business continuity, not meant for integration wit...

See all answers

What do you like most about Quest NetVault?

NetVault is a great cloud-ready enterprise backup software for hybrid data centers. Here are some of the things I really like about the solution: It is easy to use right out of the box and scales ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quest NetVault?

There's always scope for improvement with any backup software we discuss, whether it's Quest NetVault Plus or Backup Exec, and I don't think any software is 100% foolproof or satisfactory. Improvem...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Quest NetVault?

We have customers in the pharma industry. Our customers' main use cases for this backup are file system backup and different databases such as MySQL, MS SQL, Oracle, and bare metal recovery.

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Zerto Software vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 18% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 16% of the time

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 15% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 15% of the time

Rubrik vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 8% of the time

More Azure Site Recovery Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs Quest NetVault Plus

Compared 38% of the time

Quest Rapid Recovery vs Quest NetVault Plus

Compared 11% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs Quest NetVault Plus

Compared 11% of the time

vRanger vs Quest NetVault Plus

Compared 10% of the time

Rubrik vs Quest NetVault Plus

Compared 9% of the time

More Quest NetVault Plus Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Site Recovery

June 2025

Download Azure Site Recovery product report

Buyer's Guide

Quest NetVault Plus

June 2025

Download Quest NetVault Plus product report

Also Known As

No data available

NetVault Backup, Quest NetVault, Quest NetVault Backup, BakBone

Overview

Help your business to keep doing business - even during major IT outages. Azure Site Recovery offers ease of deployment, cost effectiveness, and dependability. Deploy replication, failover, and recovery processes through Site Recovery to help keep your applications running during planned and unplanned outages. Site Recovery is a native disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS), and Microsoft been recognized as a leader in DRaaS based on completeness of vision and ability to execute by Gartner in the 2018 Magic Quadrant for Disaster Recovery as a Service.

Microsoft

Quest NetVault Plus is used by organizations for efficient backup in environments such as retail machines, VMware, and virtual servers, including Hyper-V. It supports hybrid environments with Nutanix Xi.

Quest NetVault Plus is designed for backing up databases, applications, and security logs in hybrid environments. It includes a universal backup system with deduplication and allows data path mapping. Users install a client agent on PCs and a server agent for recovery tasks. Commonly used in industries like pharma, Quest NetVault Plus offers a web interface for network-wide access, dashboards for visualization, and reliable stability and reporting features. While appreciated for its backup management and efficient search capabilities, users desire improvements in its web interface and compatibility.

What are the key features of Quest NetVault Plus?

Efficient Search: Quickly locate tables and databases in backups.
Time-Saving Restoration: Speeds up recovery tasks.
Streamlined Management: Manage backups across different locations easily.
User-Friendly Interface: Offers network-wide access via an intuitive web interface.
Comprehensive Dashboard: Provides clear visibility of backup processes.

What benefits should organizations expect from Quest NetVault Plus?

Stability and Reporting: Reliable backup operations with built-in reporting tools.
Media Utilization: Optimize backup media usage for cost efficiency.
Capacity Planning: Plan for storage needs with detailed reports.
Communication: Stay informed with email notifications on backup status.

In industries like pharma, Quest NetVault Plus is implemented by configuring agents on clients and servers for effective backup and recovery. Its adaptability in hybrid setups with Nutanix Xi enhances server backup management, while its dashboard and reporting capabilities assist in monitoring and optimizing backup workflows across sectors.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

Russell Reynolds Associates, Union Insurance, Rackspace

intel, Mars, MERK, Microsoft, Uber, Visa

Buyer's Guide

Azure Site Recovery vs. Quest NetVault Plus

June 2025

Free Report: Azure Site Recovery vs. Quest NetVault Plus

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Site Recovery vs. Quest NetVault Plus and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Site Recovery vs. Quest NetVault Plus report.

See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.