Azure Network Watcher vs ManageEngine IT360 comparison

Microsoft and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Microsoft is ranked #42 with an average rating of 8.5, while ManageEngine is ranked #93. Microsoft holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to ManageEngine’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

Azure Network Watcher

Read 13 Azure Network Watcher reviews

1,082 Views
1,039 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

ManageEngine IT360

Read 5 ManageEngine IT360 reviews

1,302 Views
677 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Network Watcher

ManageEngine IT360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ManageEngine IT360 and Azure Network Watcher compete in IT infrastructure management, with users favoring ManageEngine IT360 for its support and pricing, while Azure Network Watcher shines in feature set and integration with Azure.

Features: ManageEngine IT360 provides integrated IT service management and network performance monitoring, featuring application performance management, configuration management, and a comprehensive IT infrastructure management suite. Azure Network Watcher offers native network monitoring within Azure, including topology visualization, network diagnostics, and traffic analytics, suitable for cloud-centric environments.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine IT360 could improve its scalability, cloud integration capabilities, and user interface design. Azure Network Watcher can benefit from a simplified initial setup process, enhanced direct support options, and more intuitive usability outside Azure-specific contexts.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine IT360 offers a straightforward deployment process with extensive customer support, ensuring ease for varied IT setups. Azure Network Watcher, integrating deeply with Azure, provides seamless cloud deployment but necessitates navigating a steeper learning curve, relying on documentation and community resources.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine IT360 is noted for its lower initial cost and higher ROI due to broad IT management capabilities. Azure Network Watcher, although pricier, delivers value through specialized Azure-optimized features, offering long-term ROI for cloud-centric businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Network Watcher vs. ManageEngine IT360 Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Network Watcher vs. ManageEngine IT360

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,444 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Network Watcher

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

42nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ManageEngine IT360

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

93rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Asset Management (29th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (69th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Azure Network Watcher is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine IT360 is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Azure Network Watcher	0.5%
ManageEngine IT360	0.4%
Other	99.1%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Bijoyendra Roychowdhury

Program Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Network monitoring provides comprehensive analytics while the interface requires further development

The quality of Azure Network Watcher is quite good in terms of the in-depth analysis you can create from these matrices. There are other monitoring tools such as New Relic, AppDynamics, and Dynatrace which provide very detailed network tracing. Cloud providers such as Azure or AWS do not have that kind of GUI-based capability at this point, but using PowerShell or Python, you can develop it yourself. From the GUI perspective, it still needs to evolve in terms of quality and standard, though overall, it is quite good for troubleshooting. Regarding areas for improvement, when comparing to other network tools beyond Azure Monitor or Azure Network Watcher, those tools can identify single failed packets. This level of granularity is not currently possible with cloud providers as they only go to a certain level rather than the granular level needed for deep troubleshooting, though they do provide hints with available matrices.

Read full review

Ziyad Moghalis

It manager at PTC (Public Telecomuncation Corporation)

Good monitoring and alerting capability, and it is easy to deploy

This solution is good for configuration management. The monitoring capability is easy to use and it can be done without any training. ManageEngine is easy to deploy. It is easy to identify and collect information from all of the nodes on the network. The alerting capability is good and it will send out emails.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like most about Azure Network Watcher is that it's focused more on the architecture. I also like that it has a packet capture feature that tells you how the packet travels and whether it's exiting Azure, etc."

"The stability is very good. I rate it a ten out of ten."

"The solution is stable."

"I like the visibility."

"It provides good visibility."

"My advice to others looking into using Azure Network Watcher is to go for it, as you'll have the tool by default when you're subscribed to Azure VNet."

"The most valuable feature of Azure Network Watcher is the cloud-native application firewall, which is helpful for securing databases."

"We use the solution to monitor network services. It helps to capture any network issues."

More Azure Network Watcher pros

"Customer Service: Absolutely fantastic."

"All I know is that when it comes to managing the active directory, ManageEngine is something I consider to be the best."

"The primary use case of this solution is to manage and to protect the web servers, the mail server, and the website in my company."

"The product helps users stay on top of gaining insight into the active directory, permissions and security sets, and user group policy changes."

"The monitoring capability is easy to use and it can be done without any training."

"The technical support is good."

"I would suggest you use this product as it's easy for administration, and is based on distributed model support."

"It is easy to identify and collect information from all of the nodes on the network."

Cons

"Technical support from Microsoft needs significant improvement compared to other product vendors."

"There are some occasional downtimes, but these were based on Azure-specific issues."

"The solution could improve by limiting the need to clarify the logs. When the clarification is minimized, it is better for everyone involved."

"Azure Network Watcher could improve by having other built-in applications. For example, an application to log activities for in and outbound traffic."

"The solution could use some additional components of the network culture, not only VMs. I'd like to see some additional security features because what they currently have concentrates only on the network."

"Azure is good, however, the Fortinet GUI is more intuitive and I like it more than anything else."

"I would like to see in the future if we can troubleshoot as a firewall because it is equipment as a network player and some diagnostics."

"User experience could be improved."

More Azure Network Watcher cons

"The ManageEngine features could improve to show graphs of the traffic and network utility."

"We would like to have support for integration with ServiceDesk."

"This is because of the lack of available technical knowledge in terms of competence and maximizing the power of the product."

"The product could use more intelligence, automation and general availability of product information."

"ManageEngine needs to fix the downtime scheduler for SNMP monitored devices. Alarms are still generated for the devices placed into scheduled maintenance."

"The GUI could be improved."

"We would like to have support for integration with ServiceDesk."

"The ManageEngine features could improve to show graphs of the traffic and network utility."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Price-wise, I have no information on how much Azure Network Watcher costs."

"Azure Network Watcher is a little bit expensive."

"The pricing is good. It's not too expensive."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

10%

University

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

31%

Computer Software Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	7

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Network Watcher?

I do not have the exact setup cost information on hand, but it is available in the public Azure portal. You can access the calculator there to get detailed pricing information.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Network Watcher?

The main area for improvement is AI-based features. Currently, many intelligent tools are coming from third parties, and Azure Network Watcher needs to improve in this area. The focus should be on ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Network Watcher?

Azure Network Watcher is used for monitoring network traffic. It provides insight into egress and ingress traffic, which helps determine whether consumption can be controlled. Most Azure services c...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Kentik vs Azure Network Watcher

Compared 24% of the time

Nmap vs Azure Network Watcher

Compared 17% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs Azure Network Watcher

Compared 8% of the time

Ixia Network Taps vs Azure Network Watcher

Compared 7% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Azure Network Watcher

Compared 7% of the time

More Azure Network Watcher Competitors

Netreo vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 14% of the time

Alluvio AppResponse vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 9% of the time

Kentik vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 9% of the time

USU Valuemation vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 7% of the time

Zabbix vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 7% of the time

More ManageEngine IT360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Network Watcher

March 2026

Download Azure Network Watcher product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

March 2026

Download ManageEngine IT360 product report

Also Known As

No data available

IT360

Overview

Azure Network Watcher is a comprehensive network monitoring and diagnostic service offered by Microsoft Azure. It provides a range of tools and capabilities to help users monitor, diagnose, and gain insights into their Azure network infrastructure. With Network Watcher, users can capture and analyze network traffic, monitor network performance, troubleshoot connectivity issues, and gain visibility into network topology. It also offers features like packet capture, flow logs, connection monitoring, and VPN diagnostics to ensure the smooth operation of Azure networks. Network Watcher enables users to proactively identify and resolve network issues, optimize network performance, and enhance the overall reliability and security of their Azure network environment.

Microsoft

With IT360 you will deliver services efficiently with maximum scalability. Service providers can now accurately manage the SLAs and release new services faster with features like Multi-tenancy, High Availability, Enterprise level systems and Datacenter monitoring, Remote site monitoring and Customer and site-specific dashboards.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Khimji Ramdas, RME Global, Bank of Namibia, DORMA, PMSI, National Commodities Exchange, EMA, Redstone, First Source

Buyer's Guide

Azure Network Watcher vs. ManageEngine IT360

March 2026

Free Report: Azure Network Watcher vs. ManageEngine IT360

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Network Watcher vs. ManageEngine IT360 and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Network Watcher vs. ManageEngine IT360 report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.