No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Azure Network Watcher vs DX Performance Management comparison

Microsoft and Broadcom are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Microsoft is ranked #42 with an average rating of 8.5, while Broadcom is ranked #43 with an average rating of 9.0. Microsoft holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to Broadcom’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.
Azure Network Watcher
Read 13 Azure Network Watcher reviews
  • 1,082 Views
  • 1,039 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
DX Performance Management
Read 32 DX Performance Management reviews
  • 1,591 Views
  • 1,241 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

DX Performance Management and Azure Network Watcher compete in network performance and monitoring. Azure Network Watcher has the upper hand due to its robust features, though DX Performance Management is favorable for its cost-effectiveness and customer support.

Features: DX Performance Management provides comprehensive insights into network performance, offers extensive analytics, and customizable reports. Ideal for continuous performance improvement, it caters to diverse monitoring needs. Azure Network Watcher stands out with built-in diagnostics, detailed network topology visualization, and automatic configuration checks, making it powerful for monitoring and troubleshooting.

Room for Improvement: DX Performance Management can improve in areas such as expanding advanced diagnostics capabilities, enhancing visualization features, and streamlining integration with other tools. Azure Network Watcher might benefit from simplified user onboarding, improved customer training resources, and more consistent support experiences.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: DX Performance Management is recognized for smooth deployment and effective customer support, catering to various network environments efficiently. Azure Network Watcher offers integrated deployment within the Azure ecosystem, benefitting Azure Cloud users particularly, but it may present a steeper learning curve with varying levels of support satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: DX Performance Management presents a lower initial setup cost, appealing to organizations seeking a cost-effective solution with tangible ROI improvements in performance. Conversely, Azure Network Watcher, while having higher upfront costs, delivers substantial ROI through comprehensive monitoring and agile troubleshooting capabilities, adding value for those deeply integrated with the Azure platform.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Azure Network Watcher vs. DX Performance Management Report (Updated: March 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Azure Network Watcher vs. DX Performance Management
March 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 885,444 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Network Watcher
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
42nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
DX Performance Management
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
43rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Infrastructure Capacity Planning (1st), DX NetOps (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Azure Network Watcher is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of DX Performance Management is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Azure Network Watcher0.5%
DX Performance Management0.5%
Other99.0%
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Bijoyendra Roychowdhury - PeerSpot reviewer
Bijoyendra Roychowdhury
Program Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Network monitoring provides comprehensive analytics while the interface requires further development
The quality of Azure Network Watcher is quite good in terms of the in-depth analysis you can create from these matrices. There are other monitoring tools such as New Relic, AppDynamics, and Dynatrace which provide very detailed network tracing. Cloud providers such as Azure or AWS do not have that kind of GUI-based capability at this point, but using PowerShell or Python, you can develop it yourself. From the GUI perspective, it still needs to evolve in terms of quality and standard, though overall, it is quite good for troubleshooting. Regarding areas for improvement, when comparing to other network tools beyond Azure Monitor or Azure Network Watcher, those tools can identify single failed packets. This level of granularity is not currently possible with cloud providers as they only go to a certain level rather than the granular level needed for deep troubleshooting, though they do provide hints with available matrices.
Read full review
reviewer1810893 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer1810893
Senior IT Operations Specialist at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Flexibility and detailed performance stats enable effective network monitoring
Spectrum is very good at monitoring all network faults and configurations. It enables me to take action based on network issues. The Performance Management provides detailed network performance stats, including CPU, memory, and interface bandwidth. Additionally, Spectrum is flexible and allows me to organize and treat devices uniquely without impacting other devices.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Azure Network Watcher is the cloud-native application firewall. It is helpful for securing databases."
"This is a stable system providing stable performance."
"The most valuable feature of Azure Network Watcher is the cloud-native application firewall, which is helpful for securing databases."
"The most valuable feature of Azure Network Watcher is using the gateways with the connections. The monitoring is useful for the logs and application insights into the data. The traffic filtering issues when it comes to deploying those applications are helpful."
"My advice to others looking into using Azure Network Watcher is to go for it, as you'll have the tool by default when you're subscribed to Azure VNet."
"The stability is very good. I rate it a ten out of ten."
"I like the visibility."
"The most valuable features I have found are typology, visualization, and capture."
More Azure Network Watcher pros
"Downloads and records are the most valuable features."
"It is very easy to add devices; just be aware that it requires SNMP to be enabled."
"Technical support is very responsive and knowledgeable."
"The licensing is very straightforward; it doesn't matter how many devices you have and would like to monitor, it's very straightforward."
"Scalability is the reason we bought the product to begin with. It was designed from the ground up for carrier-grade services, and we are in effect a MSP ourselves. So we were really interested in looking at something to be able to handle the multi-tenancy and scale as large as possible. This was the only solution that we really considered at that level."
"Scalability is the reason we bought the product to begin with; it was designed from the ground up for carrier-grade services, and we are in effect an MSP ourselves, so we were really interested in looking at something to be able to handle the multi-tenancy and scale as large as possible, and this was the only solution that we really considered at that level."
"My advice would be start today. The tool is great and is pretty flexible, also for integration in other tools using OpenAPI."
"The biggest selling point is putting the power of creating dashboards and reports into end users' hands."
More DX Performance Management pros
 

Cons

"Technical support from Microsoft needs significant improvement compared to other product vendors."
"Sometimes, you encounter a VPN tunnel, network, or routing issue, but finding out more about the blockage is challenging."
"Lacks sufficient security features."
"The solution could improve by limiting the need to clarify the logs. When the clarification is minimized, it is better for everyone involved."
"There are some occasional downtimes, but these were based on Azure-specific issues."
"The initial setup and deployment could be improved to be simplified."
"Azure Network Watcher needs to have better documentation and it needs to capture information accurately."
"User experience could be improved."
More Azure Network Watcher cons
"The solution could improve the database model. It is also not very good because they have a lot of interconnections with other data sources, such as NFA and VNA."
"It would be helpful if CA provided online training for its customers."
"We would like to be capable of reporting network performance with a report strictly focused on the times outside business hours, which CA PM does not currently support. We have discontinued the use of the Business Hours Filtering until CA engineers are able to resolve or offer guidance."
"This may be available by now but for server space, when it comes to the disk file system, I'd like to see that graphically represented, or the trend, rather than what I'm seeing now."
"It needs role-based administration."
"The database should have higher availability in case of an incident."
"This may be available by now but for server space, when it comes to the disk file system, I'd like to see that graphically represented, or the trend, rather than what I'm seeing now."
"It could be a little easier to integrate new metrics."
More DX Performance Management cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Price-wise, I have no information on how much Azure Network Watcher costs."
"The pricing is good. It's not too expensive."
"Azure Network Watcher is a little bit expensive."
"The price of the solution is reasonable."
"We purchase a license to use the solution every three years and we have multiple contracts. They have been increasing the price annually. We have a baseline for three years and then we need to pay the difference from the baseline, and we are in the process of negotiating a new price for all the licenses we need. The price overall is affordable."
"They should provide more scalable licensing for the product."
"Do your homework and know how many devices you will be managing out of the gate. Be sure to project what your growth will be each year."
"I like the licensing model because it's device-based."
"The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices."
"We were looking at other vendors in the marketplace for NetFlow, and CA just beat everybody else in price, cost, and the size to implement. ​"
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Construction Company
10%
University
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Construction Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Healthcare Company
9%
Outsourcing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Large Enterprise25
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Network Watcher?
I do not have the exact setup cost information on hand, but it is available in the public Azure portal. You can access the calculator there to get detailed pricing information.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Azure Network Watcher?
The main area for improvement is AI-based features. Currently, many intelligent tools are coming from third parties, and Azure Network Watcher needs to improve in this area. The focus should be on ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Azure Network Watcher?
Azure Network Watcher is used for monitoring network traffic. It provides insight into egress and ingress traffic, which helps determine whether consumption can be controlled. Most Azure services c...
See all answers
What needs improvement with DX Performance Management?
Spectrum's topology view sometimes does not rebuild automatically when a device is shut down and reconnected. It requires manual discovery and rebuilding of the topology, which I hope can be improved.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for DX Performance Management?
I have used Spectrum for monitoring all network faults, configurations, and troubleshooting network issues. It provides network performance stats, such as CPU, memory, and interface bandwidth detai...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering DX Performance Management?
I would recommend this solution based on its functionality, flexibility, customizability, and ease of use. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. I am just a customer and not a par...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Kentik vs Azure Network Watcher Logo
Kentik vs Azure Network Watcher
Compared 24% of the time
Nmap vs Azure Network Watcher Logo
Nmap vs Azure Network Watcher
Compared 17% of the time
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs Azure Network Watcher Logo
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs Azure Network Watcher
Compared 8% of the time
Ixia Network Taps vs Azure Network Watcher Logo
Ixia Network Taps vs Azure Network Watcher
Compared 7% of the time
PRTG Network Monitor vs Azure Network Watcher Logo
PRTG Network Monitor vs Azure Network Watcher
Compared 7% of the time
More Azure Network Watcher Competitors
Datadog vs DX Performance Management Logo
Datadog vs DX Performance Management
Compared 8% of the time
Kentik vs DX Performance Management Logo
Kentik vs DX Performance Management
Compared 7% of the time
WhatsUp Gold vs DX Performance Management Logo
WhatsUp Gold vs DX Performance Management
Compared 6% of the time
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs DX Performance Management Logo
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs DX Performance Management
Compared 6% of the time
Great Bay vs DX Performance Management Logo
Great Bay vs DX Performance Management
Compared 5% of the time
More DX Performance Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Azure Network Watcher
March 2026
Azure Network Watcher reportDownload Azure Network Watcher product report
Buyer's Guide
DX Performance Management
March 2026
DX Performance Management reportDownload DX Performance Management product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
CA Performance Management
 

Overview

Azure Network Watcher is a comprehensive network monitoring and diagnostic service offered by Microsoft Azure. It provides a range of tools and capabilities to help users monitor, diagnose, and gain insights into their Azure network infrastructure. With Network Watcher, users can capture and analyze network traffic, monitor network performance, troubleshoot connectivity issues, and gain visibility into network topology. It also offers features like packet capture, flow logs, connection monitoring, and VPN diagnostics to ensure the smooth operation of Azure networks. Network Watcher enables users to proactively identify and resolve network issues, optimize network performance, and enhance the overall reliability and security of their Azure network environment.

Microsoft

CA Performance Management is a comprehensive and highly scalable network performance monitoring and analytics platform. It was built to meet the unique demands of big data and modern networks architectures, including highly dynamic and complex hybrid cloud and software-defined networks (SDN).

The platform is design to reduce complexity inherent in modern networks built across numerous technology stacks through advanced network performance monitoring and relationship mapping for improved operational assurance.

Combined with CA Virtual Network Assurance, the platform extends operator visibility through advanced discovery and network performance monitoring of highly sensitive cloud and multi-layered SDN networks and service chains.

Broadcom
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Jack Henry & Assoc, Target, CenturyLink, Bell Canada, BrightHouse Networks, Telus, Unisys, Verizon, Southern California Edison, GEICO, Fidelity Investments, Wells Fargo, American Family Insurance Group, Deutsche Telekom AG 
Buyer's Guide
Azure Network Watcher vs. DX Performance Management
March 2026
Free Report: Azure Network Watcher vs. DX Performance Management
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Network Watcher vs. DX Performance Management and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Azure Network Watcher vs. DX Performance Management report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.