We performed a comparison between Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) and Mirantis Container Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The platform's high scalability is one of its biggest advantages."
"I found the Helm deployment feature of the solution valuable."
"The most valuable features of AKS are the full array of capabilities and robust security."
"The advantage of AKS is somewhat greater than that of Kubernetes, such as those provided by Google Cloud or AWS. However, the unique benefit offered by Microsoft is its robust CI/CD capabilities, along with the Azure feature for building workflows. When you combine the entire ecosystem, AKS becomes an excellent choice, particularly for enterprise applications."
"AKS is easy to use. We can scale up and down as needed with AKS, which saves us money on our cloud costs."
"Its support team resolves technical issues accurately."
"The most valuable features of AKS are rollback updates, high availability, easy management, speedy execution and deployment."
"The serverless capability and auto scale feature are the most valuable."
"It is a compact, complete solution that performs well."
"This solution has improved our organization with the agility, microservices approach, and scalable solutions for distributed systems."
"I think the volume binding is a really interesting feature."
"This solution has cut down on our development time and allows us to spin off new instances for inner development, testing, productions, and security testing."
"It is a stable solution. It is nearly perfect. I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."
"The solution is scalable and we have plans to increase usage in the future."
"The most valuable aspect is the excellent support. In addition, the billing system is really easy to understand."
"The most valuable feature is its ease of use."
"The technical support could be faster."
"The product needs to support a UI dashboard. I have to execute every single command to check the status of services which takes time."
"The solution's logs have room for improvement."
"One area that could be improved is the Azure CLI. It would be beneficial if they could abstract some of the complexities related to deployment scripts and make them a part of Azure CLI."
"The initial setup of AKS is complicated. The setup depends on the cluster, nodes, and lots of other things. There are also lots of extremely critical small devices. Moreover, you will have to pay them even while setting up the solution. It is not like you setup first and then pay for it."
"Its integration functions could be enhanced."
"It can be tough to access the servers when onboarding."
"Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is not up to optimal standards when it comes to capturing logs and visualization."
"Areas for improvement are the privacy of container management and the documentation. In the next release, I would like to see best practices on how to manage distributed containers and networks."
"I would also like to see more features inside Docker as well as more integration with different solutions."
"Sometimes the basic support is a bit difficult if you have a firewall and cloud servers behind the firewall and then try to implement the backup solution, it is a bit difficult to do by yourself."
"The solution's stability could be improved."
"It would be very nice to have a GUI that can be used by any administrator, and not just people who have experience with Docker."
"There are a couple of things. Firstly, the vaultStore database within Container isn't as efficient as a standalone Container vault. This needs improvement."
"Integration with Windows is something that can be improved."
"An improvement would be automated testing."
More Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is ranked 13th in Container Security with 32 reviews while Mirantis Container Cloud is ranked 14th in Container Security with 29 reviews. Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is rated 8.2, while Mirantis Container Cloud is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) writes "Decreases administrative burdens and costs, has good diagnostic tools, and is easy to deploy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mirantis Container Cloud writes "An easy-to-manage solution that helps to manage web pages ". Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is most compared with OpenShift, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, SUSE Rancher, Qualys VMDR and Tenable.io Container Security, whereas Mirantis Container Cloud is most compared with SUSE Rancher. See our Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. Mirantis Container Cloud report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
