Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration vs StreamSets comparison

Axway and IBM are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Axway is ranked #41 with an average rating of 7.5, while IBM is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.8. Axway holds a 0.4% mindshare in DI, compared to IBM’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Axway users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Axway AMPLIFY Application I...

Read 4 Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration reviews

669 Views
408 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

StreamSets

Read 21 StreamSets reviews

2,932 Views
2,082 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Axway AMPLIFY Application I...

StreamSets

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration and StreamSets compete in data integration and management. StreamSets has the upper hand due to its robust features for complex data workflows, while Axway AMPLIFY attracts cost-conscious buyers with its pricing and support strengths.

Features: Axway AMPLIFY offers seamless cloud integration, strong API management tools, and enterprise-scale solutions, focusing on extensive API functionality. StreamSets stands out with advanced data tracking, flexible handling of structured and unstructured data, and Change Data Capture, catering to complex data management needs.

Room for Improvement: Axway AMPLIFY may benefit from simplifying its deployment process and enhancing its documentation for optimal performance. StreamSets could improve by addressing user interface concerns, enhancing portal response times, and expanding coding support for complex data scenarios.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: StreamSets provides a flexible deployment model with robust customer support, ensuring smooth integration and operation. Axway AMPLIFY offers straightforward deployment with comprehensive documentation but requires dedicated management for optimal performance, focusing more on guided implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Axway AMPLIFY offers competitive pricing, appealing to enterprises requiring API-centric solutions with strong ROI potential. StreamSets, though pricier, justifies its cost with significant returns through comprehensive data handling efficiency, making it suitable for data-intensive environments.

To learn more, read our detailed Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration vs. StreamSets Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration vs. StreamSets

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 862,624 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axway AMPLIFY Application I...

Ranking in Data Integration

41st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

StreamSets

Ranking in Data Integration

23rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of StreamSets is 1.6%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Chris Grego

Business Development Manager at TPIsfotware

A stable solution that can be used for logistics

Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration can be used for logistics Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration is quite a stable solution. Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration is an expensive solution. I have worked with Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration for six months. We experienced a…

Read full review

Ved Prakash Yadav

Senior Data Platform Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Useful for data transformation and helps with column encryption

We use various tools and alerting systems to notify us of pipeline errors or failures. StreamSets supports data governance and compliance by allowing us to encrypt incoming data based on specified rules. We can easily encrypt columns by providing the column name and hash key. If you're considering using StreamSets for the first time, I would advise first understanding why you want to use it and how it will benefit you. If you're dealing with change tracking or handling large amounts of data, it could be cost-effective compared to services like Amazon. It's easy to schedule and manage tasks with the tool, and you can enhance your skills as an ETL developer. You can easily migrate traditional pipelines built on platforms like Informatica or Talend to StreamSets. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is that API Gateway is extremely flexible for any feature, such as connecting to Active Directory to pull the users and their authentication information. There are three ways to connect to Active Directory, and the reason for this is that the computing environments of our customers are very different. Every feature in API Gateway has got multiple methodologies for accomplishing those tasks, which is important because customers are constantly changing their security models, IT models, networks, etc. API Gateway is very flexible. It is not a one size fits all sort of situation where it is very rigid, and you can only use these pull-down menus, and that's all it ever does. It is much more open than that. It can give you fabulous reports on your users, usage, security issues, and the data sets that are going through there. You'll suddenly have visibility on the movement of data within or between your organization and other organizations. The other thing is that you're connecting API to API, which is machine to machine. The things that were done manually in an Excel spreadsheet before exchanging data through email are now done machine to machine and server to server. It speeds up the velocity of your business."

"Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration is quite a stable solution."

"The product is robust."

"Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration is very easy to use."

"The Ease of configuration for pipes is amazing. It has a lot of connectors. Mainly, we can do everything with the data in the pipe. I really like the graphical interface too"

"The ETL capabilities are very useful for us. We extract and transform data from multiple data sources, into a single, consistent data store, and then we put it in our systems. We typically use it to connect our Apache Kafka with data lakes. That process is smooth and saves us a lot of time in our production systems."

"In StreamSets, everything is in one place."

"What I love the most is that StreamSets is very light. It's a containerized application. It's easy to use with Docker. If you are a large organization, it's very easy to use Kubernetes."

"The scheduling within the data engineering pipeline is very much appreciated, and it has a wide range of connectors for connecting to any data sources like SQL Server, AWS, Azure, etc. We have used it with Kafka, Hadoop, and Azure Data Factory Datasets. Connecting to these systems with StreamSets is very easy."

"The most valuable feature is the pipelines because they enable us to pull in and push out data from different sources and to manipulate and clean things up within them."

"For me, the most valuable features in StreamSets have to be the Data Collector and Control Hub, but especially the Data Collector. That feature is very elegant and seamlessly works with numerous source systems."

"The ability to have a good bifurcation rate and fewer mistakes is valuable."

More StreamSets pros

Cons

"Because it is so flexible, you really need someone who knows Axway Gateway or has been through the training and is certified. Just because you know APIs doesn't mean you're going to walk into that API Gateway and understand what to click on. If you're going to get something done quickly, you need to find an engineer from a company who has some experience with it. It is easy to learn, but if you're doing on-the-job training, it is going to take you longer to get your project accomplished."

"Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration is an expensive solution."

"The product must improve its visibility and scalability."

"The most important point to improve is the capability to deploy in large enterprises."

"One issue I observed with StreamSets is that the memory runs out quickly when processing large volumes of data. Because of this memory issue, we have to upgrade our EC2 boxes in the Amazon AWS infrastructure."

"Visualization and monitoring need to be improved and refined."

"We often faced problems, especially with SAP ERP. We struggled because many columns weren't integers or primary keys, which StreamSets couldn't handle. We had to restructure our data tables, which was painful. Also, pipeline failures were common, and data drifting wasn't addressed, which made things worse. Licensing was another issue we encountered."

"The documentation is inadequate and has room for improvement because the technical support does not regularly update their documentation or the knowledge base."

"We've seen a couple of cases where it appears to have a memory leak or a similar problem."

"The monitoring visualization is not that user-friendly. It should include other features to visualize things, like how many records were streamed from a source to a destination on a particular date."

"If you use JDBC Lookup, for example, it generally takes a long time to process data."

"They need to improve their customer care services. Sometimes it has taken more than 48 hours to resolve an issue. That should be reduced. They are aware of small or generic issues, but not the more technical or deep issues. For those, they require some time, generally 48 to 72 hours to respond. That should be improved."

More StreamSets cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Users need to pay an annual licensing fee for the solution."

"The product is not expensive."

"API Gateway is priced on the number of transactions you run through it. API Gateway is free, and you can install as many API Gateways as you like or are necessary for your network. For example, if all of the data is inside your network or firewall, you may just need one API Gateway. If you have external customers trying to come into your organization through your firewall, you're going to need one API Gateway outside the firewall and one inside the firewall. If you have a lot of remote offices, you may want to put API Gateway in some of those offices as well. They only charge you for your usage of it. In other words, the number of transactions going through it. That's a good benefit."

"StreamSets is an expensive solution."

"It has a CPU core-based licensing, which works for us and is quite good."

"We are running the community version right now, which can be used free of charge."

"The overall cost is very flexible so it is not a burden for our organization... However, the cost should be improved. For small and mid-size organizations it might be a challenge."

"It's not so favorable for small companies."

"Its pricing is pretty much up to the mark. For smaller enterprises, it could be a big price to pay at the initial stage of operations, but the moment you have the Seed B or Seed C funding and you want to scale up your operations and aren't much worried about the funds, at that point in time, you would need a solution that could be scaled."

"There are different versions of the product. One is the corporate license version, and the other one is the open-source or free version. I have been using the corporate license version, but they have recently launched a new open-source version so that anybody can create an account and use it. The licensing cost varies from customer to customer. I don't have a lot of input on that. It is taken care of by PMO, and they seem fine with its pricing model. It is being used enterprise-wide. They seem to have got a good deal for StreamSets."

"The pricing is too fixed. It should be based on how much data you need to process. Some businesses are not so big that they process a lot of data."

More StreamSets pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

862,624 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

15%

Transportation Company

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration?

The product is robust.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration?

The management of the product must be improved. We have great pressure from our business to have visibility of integration. The product must improve its visibility and scalability.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration?

We use the solution for dealers. We also use it to integrate internal applications.

See all answers

What do you like most about StreamSets?

The best thing about StreamSets is its plugins, which are very useful and work well with almost every data source. It's also easy to use, especially if you're comfortable with SQL. You can customiz...

See all answers

What needs improvement with StreamSets?

One issue I observed with StreamSets is that the memory runs out quickly when processing large volumes of data. Because of this memory issue, we have to upgrade our EC2 boxes in the Amazon AWS infr...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for StreamSets?

We are using StreamSets for batch loading.

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP Process Orchestration vs Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration

Compared 41% of the time

ETL Solutions Transformation Manager vs Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration

Compared 39% of the time

Confluent vs Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration

Compared 20% of the time

More Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration Competitors

Informatica PowerCenter vs StreamSets

Compared 13% of the time

IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs StreamSets

Compared 12% of the time

webMethods.io vs StreamSets

Compared 9% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs StreamSets

Compared 7% of the time

SSIS vs StreamSets

Compared 6% of the time

More StreamSets Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

July 2025

Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration report

Download Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration product report

Buyer's Guide

StreamSets

June 2025

Download StreamSets product report

Also Known As

Integrator, Axway Integrator, AMPLIFY Application Integration

No data available

Overview

Axway Integrator unites multiple incompatible systems, data formats and protocols to centralize and optimize all transactions with suppliers, customers, and other trading partners. IT organizations can use it to design, execute, and monitor integration processes that include transformation of content; protocol mediation and support for files of any size, message type, or flavor of API; and compliance with industry- and company-specific regulations and requirements.

Axway

StreamSets is a data integration platform that enables organizations to efficiently move and process data across various systems. It offers a user-friendly interface for designing, deploying, and managing data pipelines, allowing users to easily connect to various data sources and destinations. StreamSets also provides real-time monitoring and alerting capabilities, ensuring that data is flowing smoothly and any issues are quickly addressed.

IBM

Sample Customers

BHF-BANK, BNP Paribas, Continental Corporation Automotive Group, Clearstream MFT, Federal Office of Information Technology, Systems and Telecommunication (FOITT), DHL, Union Nationale de Mutualit_s Socialistes, ZF Group, La Poste, Gassco, IdenTrust, Perugia Hospital, International Post Corporation, Bundesagentur fªr Arbeit (BA), IHC Health Solutions, Lenovo, Genzyme

Availity, BT Group, Humana, Deluxe, GSK, RingCentral, IBM, Shell, SamTrans, State of Ohio, TalentFulfilled, TechBridge

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration vs. StreamSets

July 2025

Free Report: Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration vs. StreamSets

Find out what your peers are saying about Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration vs. StreamSets and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

862,624 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration vs. StreamSets report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.