IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why
  • Home
  • AWS Transfer for SFTP vs. Thorn SFTP Gateway for AWS

AWS Transfer for SFTP vs Thorn SFTP Gateway for AWS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
BMC Logo

Control-M

Read 48 Control-M reviews
32,250 views|13,202 comparisons
Amazon Logo

AWS Transfer for SFTP

Read 1 AWS Transfer for SFTP review
4,092 views|3,578 comparisons
Thorn Technologies Logo

Thorn SFTP Gateway for AWS

89 views|58 comparisons
Featured Review
Robert-Stinnett
Saves time, offers great auditing capabilities, and has good automation
It freed up people to work on exciting work instead of mundane work. No one has to sit around and stare at that screen all day long. No one has to... Read more →
Use AWS Transfer for SFTP?
Use Thorn SFTP Gateway for AWS?
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
July 2022
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, HelpSystems, Seeburger and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: July 2022.
DOWNLOAD NOW
621,593 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The cost is basically $100 a job, give or take."
  • "This is an area where it is a little difficult to work with BMC. They want to do licenses by job, which is what we have. For example, the simplest is to license by job, but they can also license by nodes. While the licensing is simple to use, it might not be the correct licensing model for the customer. It is okay because we want to license by job, which is something measurable. At the end of the day, licensing by job is the most important."
  • "The cost of the hardware is high. Because you need to license each job, it is costly."
  • "You're going to spend a lot of money upfront, but the benefits you're going to get out of it are going to quickly pay for it."
  • "Initially, our licensing model was based on the number of jobs per day. That caused some issues because we were restricted to a number. So at our renewal time we said, 'We want to convert from number of jobs to number of endpoints.' That cost us extra money but it gave us additional capabilities, without worrying about the number of jobs."
  • "BMC's price is based on the number of jobs."
  • "You must accept that BMC licensing can be very confusing. No one can easily understand how they calculate things, whether it is user-based, job-based, or server-based. The calculation is quite tough. How BMC calculates licensing is not easily available anywhere."
  • "There are human costs in addition to the standard pricing and licensing of this solution."

    • More Control-M Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    621,593 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?
    Top Answer:Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful… more »
    What is the biggest difference between Oracle DAC Scheduler and Control-M?
    Top Answer:Hi! I don't know the "Oracle DAC Scheduler", but I can say that in most competitive solutions Control-m stands out in… more »
    What do you like most about Control-M?
    Top Answer:The reporting is top-notch. I haven't found any other applications on the market that can replicate what Control-M… more »
    Read all 46 answers   →
    What do you like most about AWS Transfer for SFTP?
    Top Answer:The solution offers good data recovery.
    What needs improvement with AWS Transfer for SFTP?
    Top Answer:SFTP would be better if it was more automated, particularly for file transfers. It would move things along more quickly… more »
    What is your primary use case for AWS Transfer for SFTP?
    Top Answer:We use SFTP for code changes, and then deploy to AWS. We are customers of SFTP.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Control M
    Learn More
    BMC
    Amazon
    Thorn Technologies
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Control-M simplifies application and data workflow orchestration on premises or as a service. It makes it easy to build, define, schedule, manage, and monitor production workflows, ensuring visibility, reliability, and improving SLAs.

    • Accelerate new business applications into production—by embedding workflow orchestration into your CI/CD pipeline
    • Scale Dev and Ops collaboration, with a Jobs-as-Code approach
    • Simplify workflows across hybrid and multi-cloud environments with AWS, Azure and Google Cloud Platform integrations
    • Deliver data-driven outcomes faster, managing big data workflows in a scalable way
    • Take control of your file transfer operations with integrated, intelligent file movement and visibility

    AWS Transfer for SFTP is a fully managed service that enables the transfer of files directly into and out of Amazon S3 using the Secure File Transfer Protocol (SFTP)—also known as Secure Shell (SSH) File Transfer Protocol.

    SFTP Gateway lets you easily and securely upload your files to Amazon S3 via SFTP and simplifies file-based interfaces for your AWS application.

    Offer
    Learn more about Control-M
    Learn More
    Learn more about AWS Transfer for SFTP
    Learn More
    Learn more about Thorn SFTP Gateway for AWS
    Learn More
    Sample Customers
    CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc
    Myriota, FINRA, Celgene, Kontor New Media, Belong, ThinkCX, BluTV
    Cartera Commerce, Sprint, NOKIA
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm31%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Retailer8%
    Healthcare Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company29%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Insurance Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Computer Software Company19%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Insurance Company9%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise79%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise77%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise78%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    July 2022
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, HelpSystems, Seeburger and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: July 2022.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    621,593 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AWS Transfer for SFTP is ranked 7th in Managed File Transfer (MFT) with 1 review while Thorn SFTP Gateway for AWS is ranked 36th in Managed File Transfer (MFT). AWS Transfer for SFTP is rated 9.0, while Thorn SFTP Gateway for AWS is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of AWS Transfer for SFTP writes "Provides great data recovery and data persistence". On the other hand, AWS Transfer for SFTP is most compared with IBM Sterling File Gateway, Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct, BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer, MOVEit and Aspera On Demand, whereas Thorn SFTP Gateway for AWS is most compared with .

    See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

    We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.