AWS Auto Scaling vs IBM Application Performance Management comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and IBM are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.7, while IBM is ranked #54. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 0.4% mindshare in APM, compared to IBM’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 62% of IBM users who would recommend it.

AWS Auto Scaling

Read 22 AWS Auto Scaling reviews

802 Views
754 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

IBM Application Performance...

Read 7 IBM Application Performance Management reviews

1,064 Views
1,043 Comparison Views

62% willing to recommend

AWS Auto Scaling

IBM Application Performance...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

IBM Application Performance Management and AWS Auto Scaling compete in monitoring and infrastructure scalability. IBM has a stronger foothold in performance metrics, while AWS Auto Scaling is advantageous for scalability.

Features: IBM Application Performance Management includes comprehensive monitoring tools, detailed analytics, and real-time performance tracking. AWS Auto Scaling offers seamless scalability, integration within the AWS ecosystem, and automated resource management.

Room for Improvement: IBM Application Performance Management needs better integration with non-IBM products, more intuitive configuration options, and a simplified user interface. AWS Auto Scaling requires improved compatibility with hybrid and on-premise environments, more granular control options, and enhanced reporting capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Application Performance Management has a complex setup but provides strong customer support. AWS Auto Scaling is easier to deploy but has mixed reviews regarding customer support.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Application Performance Management has higher initial setup costs but is seen as providing significant ROI through its monitoring capabilities. AWS Auto Scaling offers a more attractive pricing structure, particularly cost-efficient for dynamic workloads.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Auto Scaling vs. IBM Application Performance Management Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Auto Scaling vs. IBM Application Performance Management

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,455 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Auto Scaling

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

14th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Application Performance...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

54th

Average Rating

6.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of AWS Auto Scaling is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Application Performance Management is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
AWS Auto Scaling	0.4%
IBM Application Performance Management	0.6%
Other	99.0%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Ishaka Michael Efe

DevOps Engineer Intern at HNG Tech

Automation has simplified traffic management and improved workload efficiency

I'm not really sure what improvements I would want to see in AWS Auto Scaling because I haven't really used it extensively or explored most of it. To the extent that I've used it so far, I think it is very good. I can't really say for certain what should be improved because I haven't really explored it a lot. However, what I've been using it for has been very good. If there could be training for AWS Auto Scaling, that would be fine. If you could add more training on how to use it correctly and on the functions that I haven't used before or some people have not really used before, that would help. If there could be more documentation and training on it, that would be beneficial.

Read full review

Daniel Tamiru

Manager, Database & System Administration at Awash International Bank

A multi-functional solution but has poor stability and performance-related issues

We are using version 4 of IBM Application Performance Management, and it is deployed on-premises. We use it for internet banking and mainly for application performance on-site. For example, if we face performance-related issues in one of our software or managed services, we use this solution to…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is vertical auto-scaling, which is easy to use. However, most companies now prefer horizontal scaling. I set up the health check integration to monitor CPU usage. When it reaches seventy percent, it sends me an email notification."

"The good thing about Autoscaling is that it provides the capacity to minimize downtime. So, it gives you the assurance of stability and robustness within your system."

"The solution helps optimize the cost of the AWS environment."

"The setup is not very complex."

"The various scaling options available, such as step scaling, are particularly useful."

"It can scale."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it scales automatically without manual intervention based on the metrics we provide."

"Auto Scaling is a cool feature that works well and its automatic scaling capabilities are very useful."

More AWS Auto Scaling pros

"The transaction tracking feature from IBM is the most important feature for us. It is something that provides a terrific value for us and our clients. It has a lot of data sources and agents that are collectors. It is also stable."

"It's easy to use."

"The initial setup was straightforward and took minimal effort."

"Because we have partnerships with other partners, I can share a bit about what I've noticed with IBM APM compared to other vendor solutions. Specifically, with IBM, the visibility into detailed process information is more tangible. On the OS level, APM displays all processes (or the top 10 processes) that are consuming CPU or resident memory. This is the most important thing that is not always available with other vendors."

"The most valuable feature is the breakdown that it provides, such as a description of the fields for a particular transaction."

"I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten."

"IBM Application Performance Management helped us increased our response time by 80% and cost 60% less."

Cons

"It could be cheaper."

"The solution's infrastructure scalability and elasticity could be improved."

"It has latency issues. It depends on the distribution used, whether it's Amazon Linux, Windows Linux, etc. Occasionally, there are latency issues, which might lead to slower performance."

"Setting up the configuration involves too much work for the cloud engineer."

"There hasn't been a need for improvements."

"In comparison to other public clouds, the product is costly."

"AWS Auto Scaling's documentation could be better."

"The tool's stability could be improved."

More AWS Auto Scaling cons

"Its web user interface is a little bit old in comparison to other solutions, such as New Relic, and it should be improved. Its scalability and technical support should also be improved. Currently, it is scalable, but only in a vertical way. They provide good technical support, but the initial steps for a new case can be improved to fasten the resolution process."

"They should focus on potentially enhancing the dashboard to make it more contemporary and adding some customization options. Furthermore, there might be room for improvement in the pricing policy."

"It's still missing some platforms. For example, if you look to applications itself, it is missing the interface."

"Technical support can be slow and needs improvement."

"With APM, we noticed that the agent can cause a lot of issues for the application, making the agent very unreliable. Many issues are happening, and we've had to discuss it with support to try and get a fix. It affects application availability, and sometimes actions fail because of the agent, degrading the performance of the application."

"The stability is not great and should be better."

"The demo that was provided to us is not working very well. At times, there are errors."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS Auto Scaling is a cheap solution."

"The product has moderate pricing."

"The product is expensive."

"AWS Auto Scaling is an expensive solution."

"AWS Auto Scaling is a pay-per-use and pay-as-you-use service."

"AWS Auto Scaling's price is high."

"The pricing is good. I have not had any customers that have complained about the price."

"IBM APM is one of the cheaper products on the market, while everything necessary to get started is included in the license."

"The licensing fees can be paid every six months or on a yearly basis."

"As I previously indicated, I initiated the IBM and uncovered all its elements. Consequently, I'm not inclined towards a licensing approach."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,455 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

20%

Retailer

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS Auto Scaling?

The tool's most valuable feature is vertical auto-scaling, which is easy to use. However, most companies now prefer horizontal scaling. I set up the health check integration to monitor CPU usage. W...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Auto Scaling?

I'm not sure about the pricing aspect of AWS Auto Scaling or the cost of it.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Auto Scaling?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Akamai mPulse vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 35% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 35% of the time

Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 30% of the time

More AWS Auto Scaling Competitors

BMC AMI Strobe vs IBM Application Performance Management

Compared 23% of the time

Instana Dynamic APM vs IBM Application Performance Management

Compared 17% of the time

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs IBM Application Performance Management

Compared 12% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs IBM Application Performance Management

Compared 12% of the time

Dynatrace vs IBM Application Performance Management

Compared 10% of the time

More IBM Application Performance Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

January 2026

Download AWS Auto Scaling product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

January 2026

IBM Application Performance Management report

Download IBM Application Performance Management product report

Also Known As

AWS Auto-Scaling

IBM APM

Overview

AWS Auto Scaling monitors your applications and automatically adjusts capacity to maintain steady, predictable performance at the lowest possible cost. Using AWS Auto Scaling, it’s easy to setup application scaling for multiple resources across multiple services in minutes. The service provides a simple, powerful user interface that lets you build scaling plans for resources including Amazon EC2 instances and Spot Fleets, Amazon ECS tasks, Amazon DynamoDB tables and indexes, and Amazon Aurora Replicas. AWS Auto Scaling makes scaling simple with recommendations that allow you to optimize performance, costs, or balance between them. If you’re already using Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling to dynamically scale your Amazon EC2 instances, you can now combine it with AWS Auto Scaling to scale additional resources for other AWS services. With AWS Auto Scaling, your applications always have the right resources at the right time.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

The IBM Application Performance Management portfolio provides visibility, control and automation of your mission-critical applications. It helps pinpoint the root cause of application's issue more quickly and resolve the problem. The integrated capabilities cover the five key areas: discovery, end-use experience, transaction tracking, enterprise diagnostics and analytics. It also easily monitors applications to ensure optimal performance to extend your hybrid management environment capabilities, to measure the customer experience from multiple locations and to further eliminate blind spots in your application environment.

IBM

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Mibtree, EatDrinkDeals.com, IT Performance Advisor

Buyer's Guide

AWS Auto Scaling vs. IBM Application Performance Management

December 2025

Free Report: AWS Auto Scaling vs. IBM Application Performance Management

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Auto Scaling vs. IBM Application Performance Management and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,455 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Auto Scaling vs. IBM Application Performance Management report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.