AWS Auto Scaling vs OpenText SiteScope comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.8, while OpenText is ranked #18 with an average rating of 9.2. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 0.4% mindshare in APM, compared to OpenText’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

AWS Auto Scaling

Read 22 AWS Auto Scaling reviews

1,113 Views
1,046 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

OpenText SiteScope

Read 29 OpenText SiteScope reviews

2,201 Views
1,981 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

AWS Auto Scaling

OpenText SiteScope

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText SiteScope and AWS Auto Scaling are two distinct products used for monitoring and auto-scaling respectively, each with unique strengths. AWS Auto Scaling seems to have the upper hand due to its scalability and automation.

What features are offered by OpenText SiteScope in comparison to AWS Auto Scaling?

OpenText SiteScope users value robust monitoring capabilities, including comprehensive data collection and reporting. AWS Auto Scaling is praised for its seamless integration with other AWS services and automated resource scaling. AWS Auto Scaling also offers automation and integration features.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText SiteScope in comparison to AWS Auto Scaling?

OpenText SiteScope users suggest enhancements in mobile support and better integration with cloud platforms. AWS Auto Scaling users highlight the need for more intuitive management tools and improved documentation. Users of OpenText SiteScope focus more on integration needs while AWS Auto Scaling users seek enhanced usability resources.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText SiteScope in comparison to AWS Auto Scaling?

OpenText SiteScope deployment is often cited as complex, requiring intensive setup and configuration. AWS Auto Scaling is noted for its straightforward deployment. Users appreciate OpenText SiteScope customer service but note occasional delays, whereas AWS Auto Scaling provides reliable customer support.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText SiteScope in comparison to AWS Auto Scaling?

OpenText SiteScope users mention high setup costs but acknowledge substantial ROI due to its detailed monitoring. AWS Auto Scaling users enjoy the pay-as-you-go pricing model, delivering excellent ROI via cost-efficient scaling. AWS Auto Scaling is more favored for its flexible pricing and immediate ROI benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Auto Scaling vs. OpenText SiteScope Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Auto Scaling vs. OpenText SiteScope

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Auto Scaling

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

15th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText SiteScope

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of AWS Auto Scaling is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText SiteScope is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
AWS Auto Scaling	0.4%
OpenText SiteScope	0.8%
Other	98.8%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Ishaka Michael Efe

DevOps Engineer Intern at HNG Tech

Automation has simplified traffic management and improved workload efficiency

I'm not really sure what improvements I would want to see in AWS Auto Scaling because I haven't really used it extensively or explored most of it. To the extent that I've used it so far, I think it is very good. I can't really say for certain what should be improved because I haven't really explored it a lot. However, what I've been using it for has been very good. If there could be training for AWS Auto Scaling, that would be fine. If you could add more training on how to use it correctly and on the functions that I haven't used before or some people have not really used before, that would help. If there could be more documentation and training on it, that would be beneficial.

Read full review

Gyanesh Rahatekar

Back office at Reliance Industries Ltd

Achieve seamless incident response with valuable monitoring capabilities and reliable alerts

There are multiple features related to OpenText SiteScope monitoring that I have found to be very useful, such as SSL monitoring. If SSL is present as a file in a server, then OpenText SiteScope is a very effective tool to monitor when that certificate expires. It provides comprehensive information related to SSL certificates and log monitoring. If any kind of required keyword monitoring is present in the log file, OpenText SiteScope has excellent functionality for monitoring. It is very easy to configure and obtain the correct information related to end-user requirements. The agentless monitoring feature of OpenText SiteScope is particularly impressive and easy to configure and gather information from. According to the operations team perspective, there is no impact related to resource management from the agentless monitoring. It demonstrates very low resource consumption related to its functionality.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I would highly recommend Auto Scaling to others because it is a fantastic feature that simplifies scaling processes and makes deployment efficient."

"It helps us to reduce the cost."

"The tool gives you the flexibility to scale up and grow. The solution is also fast to deploy."

"AWS Auto Scaling is very good for managing traffic and creating new instances when necessary."

"When a lot of traffic comes into our organization, the product scales our instances based on our environment’s requirements."

"The solution helps optimize the cost of the AWS environment."

"Auto Scaling is a cool feature that works well and its automatic scaling capabilities are very useful."

"Our internal business applications are hosted in AWS Auto Scaling."

More AWS Auto Scaling pros

"The product's ability to monitor systems and applications and send alerts and create support tickets are the most valuable features of the product."

"Agentless data collection supporting a big number of monitor metrics."

"The most valuable feature of OpenText SiteScope is that it is easy to manage and user-friendly."

"The system is really powerful; instead of executing jobs multiple times, I can configure it once, schedule, and apply it on multiple servers in sequence."

"They can create workflows for approval processes, which is very useful to support paperless digitalization, allowing effective collaboration between many parties including approvers, reviewers, and engineering documents being signed, annotated, and marked up using this system."

"Has a simple setup. It can be up and running within hours."

"The monitoring capabilities have no limit; whatever you can imagine, you can monitor, even using URL monitors, database query monitors, and formula composite monitors, which are not common in other tools."

"My advice to other people considering SiteScope as a solution in this category of tools is that I think SiteScope is a good product."

More OpenText SiteScope pros

Cons

"It is sometimes very critical to deploy on AWS since some servers are already running in the background. There are challenges for employees on how to deploy at a given time."

"The speed of the solution must be improved."

"The billing and cost optimization of the solution could be improved."

"The product could add more features for managing instances."

"The tool must include AI features."

"It requires a downtime before deploying the Auto Scaling group."

"It could be cheaper."

"The solution is not out-of-the-box and you have to study to use it. It should be more easier to use."

More AWS Auto Scaling cons

"While working with OpenText, I noticed sometimes teams refuse intervention due to compliance issues."

"Direct integration with an SMS gateway for sending critical alerts to the support SME. This will help customer investing in third party middleware solutions for SMS."

"May require a dashboard for the data collected"

"The tool needs to support new technologies like Kubernetes. It also needs to improve scalability."

"The interface of OpenText SiteScope needs improvement. It has a Java-based interface, which is slow and could be simplified for better usability."

"It may lack some features other products in the category have like more detailed transaction tracking."

"It should improve its integrations with various tools, especially service management tools."

"Basically, full automation of the SiS config is not possible, even using HP tools like HP Operations Orchestration, as the application does not allow full configuration of monitor components via the API."

More OpenText SiteScope cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS Auto Scaling is a pay-per-use and pay-as-you-use service."

"AWS Auto Scaling is an expensive solution."

"The product has moderate pricing."

"The product is expensive."

"AWS Auto Scaling is a cheap solution."

"AWS Auto Scaling's price is high."

"The pricing is good. I have not had any customers that have complained about the price."

"You have to pay for their "solution templates". Other tools do not charge you for knowledge-based monitoring bundles."

"I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten on a scale where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"The product's pricing should be lower since there are many open-source products that can do the same job with better user interfaces. The tool's pricing is yearly and you need to pay for support."

"Depending on your requirements, there are two licensing models available. A simple point model, or an endpoint model."

"SiteScope licensing can be node based-or monitor-based. I would recommend for node-based licensing."

"The pricing or licensing cost for Micro Focus SiteScope is often bundled with other things, so the cost for each individual would be difficult to calculate. Pricing could be $2,000,000 a year. My company pays for technical support because it's part of the contract with Micro Focus SiteScope. You buy the licenses, but you're also paying for the support. With Nagios, it's much more bare-bones as far as paying for licenses and the software itself, and my company didn't have to use as much Nagios support yet in one or two years because there weren't too many problems using Nagios, and it's much more cost-effective, so that's one of the reasons why my company is migrating to Nagios from Micro Focus SiteScope."

"It is expensive. I don't like its licensing. I don't like anything where you have to license it by individual licenses. I'm not a fan of that, but that's just me."

"When Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope has introduced approximately eight years ago and there was not very much competition making the price high. However, when comparing the price of Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope now to other tools, they should reduce the price. It is similar to a legacy tool at this point."

More OpenText SiteScope pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Educational Organization

11%

Comms Service Provider

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

13%

University

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS Auto Scaling?

The tool's most valuable feature is vertical auto-scaling, which is easy to use. However, most companies now prefer horizontal scaling. I set up the health check integration to monitor CPU usage. W...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Auto Scaling?

I'm not sure about the pricing aspect of AWS Auto Scaling or the cost of it.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Auto Scaling?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

The licensing scheme for Micro Focus tools is reasonable, and more affordable. It's seen as medium or de-receivable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

Regarding areas for improvement, there may be minor issues, but I have not faced any significant issues with OpenText SiteScope because I have a team that uses this product daily. As a monitoring d...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

OpenText SiteScope has a lot of use cases including monitoring websites, monitoring URLs, monitoring infrastructure resources like CPU, hard disk, and memory usage, and customized monitoring script...

See all answers

Comparisons

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 27% of the time

Akamai mPulse vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 24% of the time

Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 21% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 15% of the time

More AWS Auto Scaling Competitors

Dynatrace vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 8% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 5% of the time

CA App Synthetic Monitor vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 5% of the time

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Diagnostics vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText SiteScope Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

March 2026

Download AWS Auto Scaling product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText SiteScope

March 2026

Download OpenText SiteScope product report

Also Known As

AWS Auto-Scaling

Micro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope, SiteScope

Overview

AWS Auto Scaling monitors your applications and automatically adjusts capacity to maintain steady, predictable performance at the lowest possible cost. Using AWS Auto Scaling, it’s easy to setup application scaling for multiple resources across multiple services in minutes. The service provides a simple, powerful user interface that lets you build scaling plans for resources including Amazon EC2 instances and Spot Fleets, Amazon ECS tasks, Amazon DynamoDB tables and indexes, and Amazon Aurora Replicas. AWS Auto Scaling makes scaling simple with recommendations that allow you to optimize performance, costs, or balance between them. If you’re already using Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling to dynamically scale your Amazon EC2 instances, you can now combine it with AWS Auto Scaling to scale additional resources for other AWS services. With AWS Auto Scaling, your applications always have the right resources at the right time.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

OpenText SiteScope is an agentless monitoring program that tracks the availability and performance of distributed IT infrastructures such as servers, network devices and services, applications and application components, virtualization software, operating systems, and other IT enterprise components.

OpenText SiteScope is an autonomous hybrid IT monitoring system that can monitor more than 100 different types of IT components in real time, thanks to a lightweight and highly customizable remote access architecture.

With OpenText SiteScope, IT teams can get the data they need to keep on top of problems and eliminate bottlenecks before they become major concerns.

OpenText SiteScope can reduce total cost of ownership (TCO) by utilizing agentless technology, which eliminates the need to install and monitor agents on each box. Manual activities can be automated, and teams can save time and effort by using pre-packaged solution templates.

OpenText SiteScope Features

OpenText SiteScope has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Broad functionality built on expertise: OpenText SiteScope's architecture is scalable and supports a broad range of functions, including data collecting, alerting, event management, and reporting. Data is collected via remote access, which eliminates the need for agents to be deployed and maintained on monitored nodes. OpenText SiteScope connects to systems as a remote user via the central server, which supports JMX, SNMP, HTTP, SSH, NetBIOS, and WMI.

Monitors legacy and modern environments: OpenText SiteScope comes with more than 100 built-in monitors that track things like utilization, response time, use, and resource availability.
- Cloud: You can monitor virtual servers and applications on Amazon Web Services (AWS). AWS-hosted applications can provide data to Amazon CloudWatch, which can be used for auto-scaling, reporting, and alerting.
- Virtualization: OpenText SiteScope supports VMware, Microsoft, Citrix, and Oracle/Sun virtualization technologies. Monitor Docker clusters, nodes, containers, and workloads.

Flexibility with configuration: By adding or deleting specific monitors, you can adapt to dynamic changes in data center configuration.

Templates for solutions: The template database is based on best practices for monitoring complex application settings with the least amount of time and effort. The templates include built-in domain experience of specialized monitors, default metrics and thresholds, proactive testing, and best practices for a given application or monitoring component.

Notifications, alerts, and reports: Email, SNMP traps, HTTP post, and database alerts are all supported. Administrators receive alerts based on defined thresholds and schedules.

Flexibility in user management: Using LDAP or an internal management solution, define group-level permissions, construct user roles, and assign security groups depending on role. Extensive WS (Web Service)-based API that automates numerous management situations without the need for the SiteScope UI.

Integrations with SiteScope: OpenText SiteScope not only offers a number of benefits on its own, but it can also be linked with a number of OpenText and third-party solutions, giving teams the ability to properly integrate their IT operations center.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Vodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank

Buyer's Guide

AWS Auto Scaling vs. OpenText SiteScope

March 2026

Free Report: AWS Auto Scaling vs. OpenText SiteScope

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Auto Scaling vs. OpenText SiteScope and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Auto Scaling vs. OpenText SiteScope report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.