Avantra vs Elastic Observability comparison

Avantra and Elastic are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Avantra is ranked #50, while Elastic is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.0. Avantra holds a 1.4% mindshare in APM, compared to Elastic’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Avantra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Elastic users who would recommend it.

Avantra

Read 5 Avantra reviews

4,927 Views
3,055 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Elastic Observability

Read 29 Elastic Observability reviews

10,959 Views
7,452 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Avantra

Elastic Observability

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Avantra and Elastic Observability are prominent products in the IT monitoring and observability space. Elastic Observability seems to have the upper hand due to its superior feature set.

Features: Avantra offers automated monitoring and performance management, particularly valuable for SAP landscapes. Elastic Observability provides robust real-time analytics, search capabilities, and seamless integration with various data sources, making it more comprehensive and versatile for diverse IT environments.

Room for Improvement: Avantra users suggest enhancements in dashboard customization, additional integration options, and wider adaptability. Elastic Observability users request improvements in scalability, resource consumption reduction, and optimized performance for large-scale usage.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Avantra has a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support, contributing to a positive user experience. Elastic Observability's deployment is more complex, and its support is seen as less responsive compared to Avantra.

Pricing and ROI: Avantra offers better initial setup costs and quicker ROI, making it attractive for budget-conscious buyers. Elastic Observability, though higher in cost, demonstrates excellent long-term value with its advanced features and capabilities, often considered worth the investment by many users.

To learn more, read our detailed Avantra vs. Elastic Observability Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Avantra vs. Elastic Observability

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Avantra

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

50th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

51st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

SAP Service Providers (15th), Server Monitoring (28th)

Elastic Observability

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

11th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (16th), Container Monitoring (5th), Cloud Monitoring Software (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Avantra is 1.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Elastic Observability is 1.7%, down from 5.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Elastic Observability	1.7%
Avantra	1.4%
Other	96.9%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Mani Velayudhan

Manager, SAP Basis at The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company

Can be fine-tuned as required, provides real-time data but lacks sufficient machine learning capability

In terms of machine learning, there are a few areas that can be improved including short terms in the SAP system. Currently, it requires a team member to manually read the short term and then assign it to a team rather than having it assigned automatically. A downside of Avantra is that it comes with predefined values. Another issue is that identical recurring problems create duplicate tickets rather than showing them as repeats. They also need to do some kernel updates which I believe they're working on but I haven't seen it yet; I'm hoping the solution will be completely automated. I would like to see more on the machine-learning front and to have some third-party tools.

Read full review

Mohammed-Abdelalim

Assistant Vice President at QualityKiosk Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Has provided powerful customization for unique monitoring needs but needs more out-of-the-box capabilities

In my opinion, the best features of Elastic Observability are their flexibility to integrate with other existing systems and the ability to build a unified monitoring tool that can integrate with existing ones and end-to-end user journeys which require a lot of customizations. The greatest feature in Elastic is the ability to customize. This is similar to my comments about customizable dashboards in Elastic because it's visible to the analyst. However, it's very great. Customizing these dashboards can meet the customer's specific use cases and specific stories that they have in their environment, their special environment that doesn't look like other environments. The dashboarding in Elastic is highly customizable to the level of logos. If the customer wants his company logo in the dashboard, it can be done.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It prevented two major failures in our SAP production systems."

"It's just very user-friendly, and it's very easy to monitor the servers using Avantra."

"You can customize alerts based on need."

"Deployment was amazingly short and simple; I do not think I have seen any SAP-related product installs ready to work so fast, and out-of-box it included most of the functions and settings that we needed."

"It's very easy to manage and use."

"I definitely recommend this solution, it provides good value for money."

"The most valuable feature of Avantra is automation. The reduction of manual work and having them automated is one of the top reasons why I would use it."

"The solution is open-source and helps with back-end logging. It is also easy to handle."

"It is scalable and supports multitenancy, which is beneficial for MSPs."

"We use AppDynamics and Elastic. The reason why we're using Elastic APM is because of the license count. It's very favorable compared to AppDynamics. It's inexpensive; it's economical."

"I think Elastic Observability is already in very good shape."

"The architecture and system's stability are simple."

"The product has connectors to many services."

"We can view and connect different sources to the dashboard using it."

"The solution allows us to dig deep into data."

More Elastic Observability pros

Cons

"The dashboard needs to improve; it's not so clear right now and we need it to be more usable so we can have all of our reports in one easy-to-access place."

"The dashboard needs to improve."

"The machine-learning is lacking and should be improved."

"We are currently exploring automation options for various areas, and Avantra should consider implementing automation for change request management, an area they have not yet ventured into. While Avantra is currently excelling in monitoring and system refreshes, there is scope for improvement in automating change request management. In addition to primarily focusing on SAP, Avantra currently performs kernel patches which are core SAP patches. However, exploring more into OS patching could be another potential area for Avantra to expand its automation capabilities."

"I think they can improve their UI, while very intuitive, I would like to see graphic updates."

"A downside of Avantra is that it comes with predefined values."

"Elastic Observability could improve asset discovery as the current requirement to push the agent is not ideal."

"The interface could be improved."

"When I go to the portal, I do not see many insights on the endpoints or where there could be latencies."

"Improving code insight related to infrastructure and network, particularly focusing on aspects such as firewalls, switches, routers, and testing would be beneficial."

"Elastic APM's visualization is not that great compared to other tools. It's number of metrics is very low."

"The cost must be made more transparent."

"The auto-discovery isn't nearly as good. That's a big portion of it. When you drop the agent onto the JVM and you're trying to figure things out, having to go through and manually do all that is cumbersome."

"Elastic Observability needs to improve the retrieval of logs and metrics from all the instances."

More Elastic Observability cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Since we are a huge company, Elastic Observability is an affordable solution for us."

"One needs to pay for the licenses, and it is an annual subscription model right now."

"Users have to pay for some features, like the alerts on different channels, because they are unavailable in different source versions."

"Elastic Observability's pricing could be better for small-scale users."

"We have been using the open-source version."

"The price of Elastic Observability is expensive."

"The product’s pricing needs improvement."

"Elastic Observability is cheaper than other similar solutions, such as Dynatrace. Its license calculation is based on various factors like data volume and physical infrastructure, particularly related to RAM capacity."

More Elastic Observability pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	16

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Observability?

The problem is their licensing model, which is a bit confusing. Many customers struggle to understand their total cost of ownership because Elastic licensing is not dependent on easy, quantifiable ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Elastic Observability?

After careful consideration about areas for improvement in Elastic Observability, aspects such as pricing, customization, implementation, and scalability could be improved. As a user of the system,...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Elastic Observability?

My use case for Elastic Observability is observability, as we upload our customers' data, including logs, and when there is an issue, we can analyze what went wrong.

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Avantra

Compared 12% of the time

Datadog vs Avantra

Compared 10% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Avantra

Compared 10% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Avantra

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Avantra

Compared 7% of the time

More Avantra Competitors

Dynatrace vs Elastic Observability

Compared 5% of the time

Grafana vs Elastic Observability

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Elastic Observability

Compared 4% of the time

New Relic vs Elastic Observability

Compared 4% of the time

Datadog vs Elastic Observability

Compared 3% of the time

More Elastic Observability Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Avantra

June 2026

Download Avantra product report

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability

June 2026

Download Elastic Observability product report

Overview

Avantra is an industry-leading platform designed to automate SAP operations for enterprises. It optimizes SAP landscapes, ensuring efficient performance management to meet the demands of large-scale environments while reducing manual tasks.

Avantra automates SAP operations, providing tools that enhance efficiency and reliability. It assists enterprises with advanced monitoring, performance optimization, and predictive analytics, crucial for managing complex SAP landscapes. By integrating seamlessly with SAP environments, it offers comprehensive insights and automations that lead to improved operational control and reduced manual intervention. Businesses benefit significantly by bridging IT operations with business objectives, thereby facilitating more effective resource allocation and decision-making processes.

What are the key features of Avantra?

Automated Health Checks: Conducts daily system analysis for consistent performance tracking.
Predictive Monitoring: Uses AI for early detection of potential SAP issues to prevent downtime.
Customizable Dashboards: Offers a clear view of system performance with customizable metrics.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly fits into existing workflows with robust integrations.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Automation reduces the workload on IT teams, freeing up resources.
Cost Reduction: Minimizes downtime and resource wastage, leading to cost savings.
Improved Decision Making: Real-time data insights enable better strategic planning.
Enhanced Performance: Boosts system stability and enhances user satisfaction.

Avantra is particularly beneficial in industries with heavy reliance on SAP systems, such as manufacturing and finance. It helps streamline operations, providing rapid responsiveness to market changes and regulatory requirements, ensuring that businesses remain competitive and compliant in their respective fields.

Avantra

Elastic Observability offers a comprehensive suite for log analytics, application performance monitoring, and machine learning. It integrates seamlessly with platforms like Teams and Slack, enhancing data visualization and scalability for real-time insights.

Elastic Observability is designed to support production environments with features like logging, data collection, and infrastructure tracking. Centralized logging and powerful search functionalities make incident response and performance tracking efficient. Elastic APM and Kibana facilitate detailed data visualization, promoting rapid troubleshooting and effective system performance analysis. Integrated services and extensive connectivity options enhance its role in business and technical decision-making by providing actionable data insights.

What are the most important features of Elastic Observability?

Centralized Logging: Streamlines the collection, analysis, and storage of log data.
Powerful Search: Provides robust search capabilities for quick access to relevant information.
Scalability: Supports growing data needs across diverse environments.
Real-time Telemetry: Ensures up-to-date insights and monitoring.
Platform Integration: Seamlessly connects with services like Teams and Slack.
Data Visualization: Enhances visibility with Elastic APM and Kibana.

What benefits and ROI should users explore in reviews?

Cost-effectiveness: Offers significant savings through efficient data management.
Rapid Incident Response: Minimizes downtime with quick troubleshooting tools.
Comprehensive Insights: Supports better business decisions with detailed data analysis.
Performance Tracking: Enables assessment of system effectiveness and improvements.

Elastic Observability is employed across industries for critical operations, such as in finance for transaction monitoring, in healthcare for secure data management, and in technology for optimizing application performance. Its data-driven approach aids efficient event tracing, supporting diverse industry requirements.

Elastic

Sample Customers

Migros, Strauss, Migros, LAM research, Deloitte, Deloitte, Kiewit

PSCU, Entel, VITAS, Mimecast, Barrett Steel, Butterfield Bank

Buyer's Guide

Avantra vs. Elastic Observability

June 2026

Free Report: Avantra vs. Elastic Observability

Find out what your peers are saying about Avantra vs. Elastic Observability and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Avantra vs. Elastic Observability report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.