No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs Netdata comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Auvik Network Management (ANM)
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
7th
Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
213
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (4th), Network Troubleshooting (1st), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (2nd)
Netdata
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
30th
Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software
23rd
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Server Monitoring (15th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Auvik Network Management (ANM) is 1.3%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Netdata is 1.1%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Auvik Network Management (ANM)1.3%
Netdata1.1%
Other97.6%
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

John Adeyemi - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Network Infrastructure Engineer at TIGER LOGIC
Unified monitoring has provided real-time visibility and simplified network troubleshooting
One area of Auvik Network Management (ANM) that could be improved is that once it discovers network devices, the naming at times is confusing. Auvik Network Management (ANM) does not always bring out the hostname and instead brings out a generic name, which I then need to change. If Auvik Network Management (ANM) could improve this aspect so that when it discovers devices, it correctly retrieves the hostname every time, it would eliminate the need to edit each hostname, especially on PCs and printers. The GUI is fine. Auvik Network Management (ANM) has a level of access control where I can manage access and control user access to Auvik Network Management (ANM) portal. The GUI is acceptable for me. Gaining instant visibility into my network health with Auvik Network Management (ANM) is easy because from the setup, it is straightforward. For instance, I manage different sites, so all I need is to install Auvik Network Management (ANM) collector on any server in the environment. Once I install the collector, I automatically start discovering devices. The beauty of Auvik Network Management (ANM) is that it separates devices into tabs for routers, switches, wireless, computers and hosts, and others. At times it might not categorize some devices properly, but I can move them to the right sub-interfaces. In terms of visibility, it is very easy and fast compared to other management solutions I have used. Most other solutions are agentless, so they do not discover much and you might need to add them manually. With Auvik Network Management (ANM), I do not need to add anything manually as it discovers and updates automatically. Using Auvik Network Management (ANM) is mostly easy. I do not have any challenges. In terms of usability, it is fine. The visibility it provides is top-notch. Deployment is also easy. The only suggestion I would make is to make some of the fonts on the images on the topology bolder. Outside that, Auvik Network Management (ANM) is fine because from Auvik Network Management (ANM) management plane, I can push configurations to my devices, do backups, and many other things. Auvik Network Management (ANM) provides a network map along with its dashboard that gives me a real-time picture of my network. I have tested the intelligence myself by adding a new device on the network and after some minutes, seeing Auvik Network Management (ANM) update its topology. Even down to VPN and SSL site-to-site VPN access to other branches, Auvik Network Management (ANM) pulls out all these connections. When I have a new engineer on my team, I tell them to look at the topology, which is the network topology there. There is no need to draw with draw.io or Visio. It is Auvik Network Management (ANM). Using the network map and dashboard in Auvik Network Management (ANM) to gain real-time visibility into my network is somewhat easy. If Auvik Network Management (ANM) could work on making the pictures bolder, it would help considerably. Sometimes I need to open the topology in another tab and put it on another screen to make it bolder. If Auvik Network Management (ANM) could enhance the pictures to make them more bold, it would go a long way.
Yash Dhawan - PeerSpot reviewer
Tech Ops Engineer at Zeller
Real-time monitoring has transformed incident response and keeps critical workloads running smoothly
Netdata's best features are visualization, which helps operational efficiency and reduces downtime while supporting faster incident response, and real-time monitoring, which provides second-by-second visibility into infrastructure. The dashboard makes it easy to visualize, and it has the capability to create alarms with very low operational overhead, requiring much less maintenance compared to many traditional monitoring solutions. It is highly scalable for distributed systems, enabling me to monitor multiple services efficiently while maintaining responsive dashboards. The feature I find myself relying on the most day-to-day is the real-time monitoring and live dashboards, as it provides second-by-second visibility into infrastructure health, helping my team detect issues instantly instead of waiting. This feature is extremely useful during production incidents and troubleshooting, enabling faster root cause analysis and quicker response times. In many environments, engineers rely heavily on Netdata during CPU memory spikes, Kubernetes pod failures, network bottlenecks, and application latency investigations, which highlight the biggest advantages of using Netdata. Netdata has positively impacted my organization by improving downtime and incident response workflows through real-time visibility into infrastructure and application performance. The live dashboards greatly assist us, as instant metric updates allow me to quickly detect anomalies, resource spikes, and service degradation before they escalate into larger production issues. The overall improvement has been significant. In terms of specific metrics or outcomes regarding Netdata, there has been a reduction in downtime and faster incident resolution due to better monitoring capabilities. When infrastructure services degrade, such as during particular CPU usage spikes, I can visualize these events from the dashboard, helping me identify bottlenecks and conduct root cause analysis. These functionalities enhance visibility and proactive capabilities for faster anomaly detection, contributing to overall improved operational efficiency and infrastructure reliability.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
904,680 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Transportation Company
64%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Financial Services Firm
4%
Computer Software Company
3%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business151
Midsize Enterprise32
Large Enterprise23
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Auvik?
Auvik Network Management (ANM) has competitive pricing and licensing, competitive to LogicMonitor, but it is a different kind of product. So it is not really compared to something else, but I think...
What needs improvement with Auvik?
One area of Auvik Network Management (ANM) that could be improved is that once it discovers network devices, the naming at times is confusing. Auvik Network Management (ANM) does not always bring o...
What is your primary use case for Auvik?
I use Auvik Network Management (ANM) to monitor my entire IT infrastructure from the network, firewall, servers, wireless, and access points. By installing Auvik Network Management (ANM) collector ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netdata?
As I am going with the subscription-based model in the SaaS, the pricing and setup cost are very nice, and the setup is very easy since I am running the server inside GCP.
What needs improvement with Netdata?
Netdata can be improved by incorporating AI-driven anomaly detection and predictive monitoring capabilities to forecast potential bottlenecks. Additionally, broader native integrations with enterpr...
What is your primary use case for Netdata?
Netdata serves as my real-time monitoring and observability platform for infrastructure and application performance monitoring, providing highly detailed real-time metrics with minimal setup and lo...
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, SolarWinds and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: June 2026.
904,680 professionals have used our research since 2012.