

Auvik Network Management and Isovalent are competing network management solutions. While ANM holds an advantage in customer support and pricing, Isovalent leads with advanced features focusing on observability and security.
Features: ANM offers comprehensive network visibility, automated monitoring, and robust tools for network troubleshooting. Isovalent provides advanced observability features, security enhancements, and deep insights using eBPF technology.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ANM is known for straightforward deployment with comprehensive support to ease setup processes. Isovalent may demand more effort during initial setup but benefits from strong documentation and community resources.
Pricing and ROI: ANM is a cost-effective solution with transparent pricing and favorable ROI, providing cost benefits over time. Isovalent, though more costly initially, offers significant ROI with its advanced capabilities for businesses needing detailed insights.
Auvik Network Management (ANM) has saved us time by being able to go to that single pane of glass and identify things collectively versus bouncing back and forth between different web portals.
Auvik Network Management (ANM) helped us find the source of the problem relatively quickly, and everything was resolved within the hour.
The time has been reduced from hours to minutes, and costs have also decreased.
I have seen a return on investment, principally in time saved, because I invest considerable time creating and developing the solution using Isovalent.
In reducing overall latency to the numbers I mentioned before, this has increased usability without spending more money, so a return on investment is instantaneous.
I think the return on investment question is not the best for me because if the metric includes decreased time of support related to network issues for the deployed applications, then fewer employees are needed from the support team.
They were knowledgeable and responded quickly with accurate and useful information.
They introduced the product to us and explained how to deal with it.
I would give Auvik Network Management support a ten out of ten.
While I have faced some issues regarding the setup things, they have helped me immediately.
The customer support is first rate.
The customer support for Isovalent is great.
The platform scales well and supports our organizational needs.
It was capable of handling all those clients perfectly.
We keep adding sites into Auvik Network Management, and it doesn't seem to affect performance or anything on our end.
Isovalent can handle a large number of users connected at the same time.
In local setups where pods spawn and auto-scaling occurs, Isovalent Cilium product remains stable.
I would rate the stability of Auvik Network Management (ANM) a perfect 10 because I have never found any problems.
A lot of platforms, especially when it comes to CRMs, CMSs, and ERPs, are still built on PHP and MySQL, which I feel is archaic now and slow to query.
In terms of stability, I would rate Auvik Network Management as a ten out of ten, as it does not experience jitter or other major issues.
I was running a Kubernetes cluster, and the main challenge that Isovalent helped my team with was the separation of all traffic between applications.
Auvik Network Management (ANM) does not have server monitoring and server hardware monitoring, which LogicMonitor has, and these features make me continue to use LogicMonitor.
When I have a new engineer on my team, I tell them to look at the topology, which is the network topology there. There is no need to draw with draw.io or Visio.
We were unable to integrate Auvik with a geographical map, which limited our ability to track issues to specific buildings on campus.
Sharing end-to-end use cases that can be achieved using Cilium would be great for people to look into and then apply to their specific use cases.
They could have high-level documentation first, and if anyone wants to deep dive into any areas, they can read more on that.
Isovalent makes it easier. Before Isovalent, we struggled with just simple pod observability with products like Kalisti that sat on the side of the sidecar.
The setup is very straightforward, and the pricing is not high, making it easily affordable for new startups or small firms.
Auvik is pricey, and we were paying a lot for it, especially when compared to SolarWinds.
The pricing for Auvik Network Management (ANM) is great; it is comparable to other solutions, and for what it does, it actually provides more value for the money than some of the other major competitors.
However, sometimes I feel the costing is a bit high, on the higher side.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is very easy because Isovalent is simple.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it was not a big issue to configure.
Auvik Core's ease of use also enhanced troubleshooting speed and efficiency.
Its proactive monitoring and simplified troubleshooting have significantly impacted our efficiency in handling network management tasks.
We can go to different places and monitor, check, configure, and analyze traffic.
The specific Cilium features that stand out to me the most include the eBPF-based networking, which is a big advantage for networking, load balancing, security, observability, and everything.
In reducing overall latency to the numbers I mentioned before, this has increased usability without spending more money, so a return on investment is instantaneous.
Isovalent helped my support teams be more efficient by decreasing time consumption related to troubleshooting for network-related issues.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Auvik Network Management (ANM) | 4.9% |
| Isovalent | 0.9% |
| Other | 94.2% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 155 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 25 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
Auvik Network Management offers competitive pricing for essential network and infrastructure device management, providing robust features valued by enterprises.
Auvik Network Management delivers comprehensive network visibility and management through intuitive auditing, alerting, and discovery functionalities. It eases troubleshooting, automates configuration backups, and includes a user-friendly interface for effective monitoring and management. With real-time alerts and customizable notifications, IT operations are streamlined, while remote access capabilities enhance time efficiency. ANM supports integration with other platforms, effectively maintaining device inventories and visualizing network topology.
What are the key features of Auvik Network Management?In industries such as IT management and network administration, Auvik Network Management is predominantly utilized for overseeing and maintaining network infrastructures across multiple locations. It offers capabilities for monitoring network topology, receiving alerts on device downtimes, and managing performance metrics. Users employ its features for proactive issue identification, and auditing, helping maintain oversight of networks containing switches, routers, and firewalls. Auvik provides remote access and automated backups, which contribute to enhanced operational efficiency and network visibility.
Isovalent offers cutting-edge networking and security solutions for Kubernetes environments, empowering enterprises with enhanced control and visibility.
Isovalent leverages eBPF technology to redefine cloud-native network and security management. By enabling seamless monitoring and security operations within Kubernetes, Isovalent supports businesses in managing workloads efficiently, enhancing observability, and ensuring robust security measures. It provides a scalable architecture that aligns with modern application demands.
What are Isovalent's key features?Isovalent is implemented in industries like finance and healthcare where security and reliability are paramount. Its deployment ensures compliance and minimizes risk, making it an ideal choice for sectors requiring high data integrity and privacy.
We monitor all Network Troubleshooting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.