Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AVG PM vs Autonomic Patch Manager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Autonomic Patch Manager
Ranking in Patch Management
53rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
AVG PM
Ranking in Patch Management
49th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Autonomic Patch Manager is 0.0%. The mindshare of AVG PM is 0.0%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HCLSoftware , Qualys and others in Patch Management. Updated: July 2025.
861,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Aetna 2. Adobe 3. ADP 4. Airbus 5. Amazon 6. American Express 7. Aon 8. ATT 9. Autodesk 10. Bank of America 11. Barclays 12. BASF 13. Bayer 14. BlackRock 15. Boeing 16. BNP Paribas 17. Cisco 18. CocaCola 19. Comcast 20. Dell 21. Deutsche Bank 22. eTrade 23. ExxonMobil 24. Ford 25. GE 26. Google 27. HP 28. IBM 29. Intel 30. JPMorgan Chase 31. Kraft Heinz 32. Lockheed Martin
1. Acer 2. Adobe 3. Adidas 4. Aetna 5. Airbus 6. Alibaba 7. Amazon 8. American Express 9. Apple 10. ATT 11. Audi 12. Avaya 13. BMW 14. Boeing 15. Cisco 16. CocaCola 17. Dell 18. Disney 19. eBay 20. ExxonMobil 21. FedEx 22. Ford 23. General Electric 24. Google 25. HP 26. IBM 27. Intel 28. JPMorgan Chase 29. Kelloggs 30. LG 31. Mercedes-Benz 32. Microsoft
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HCLSoftware , Qualys and others in Patch Management. Updated: July 2025.
861,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.