Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Automai AppLoader vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Automai AppLoader
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Performance Testing Tools (19th), Load Testing Tools (22nd)
OpenText Functional Testing...
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (12th), Test Automation Tools (11th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Quality Assurance solutions, they serve different purposes. Automai AppLoader is designed for Load Testing Tools and holds a mindshare of 1.2%, up 0.4% compared to last year.
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers, on the other hand, focuses on Functional Testing Tools, holds 2.9% mindshare, up 2.7% since last year.
Load Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Automai AppLoader1.2%
Apache JMeter16.2%
Tricentis NeoLoad15.4%
Other67.2%
Load Testing Tools
Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers2.9%
Tricentis Tosca18.4%
BrowserStack10.0%
Other68.7%
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Use Automai AppLoader?
Share your opinion
Eitan Gold - PeerSpot reviewer
User-friendly integration with support for Visual Studio enhances GUI testing capabilities
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio. The support is excellent. It is easy to implement tests with OpenText UFT Developer. We primarily use it for GUI testing and testing web applications with another application. This is the main usage for us. We also integrate it with the N-unit Framework, and they work well together.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
869,785 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
20%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
Performing Arts
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise29
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Developer?
There are many good things. Like it is intuitive and scripting was easy. Plus the availability of experienced resources in India due to its market leadership.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus UFT Developer?
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Developer?
As of now, we don't have integration in the CI/CD pipeline, but they are supporting that as well. When your machine is in a locked state, you can even execute the Windows application automation. Mi...
 

Also Known As

AppLoader, NRG Global AppLoader
Micro Focus UFT Developer, UFT Pro (LeanFT), Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT), LeanFT, HPE LeanFT
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Ellie Mae, Meditech, HP Consulting, ESRI, Fox, UCLA, Baylor Health Care Systems
Walmart, Hitachi, American Airlines, PepsiCo, AT&T, Ericsson, United Airlines
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Tricentis, OpenText and others in Load Testing Tools. Updated: September 2025.
869,785 professionals have used our research since 2012.