Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AuraQuantic vs Microsoft Power Apps comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.8
AuraQuantic enhances efficiency, speeds up tasks, optimizes resources, and boosts productivity and ROI through customization and automation.
Sentiment score
7.7
Microsoft Power Apps boosts time-to-market, automates processes, and reduces costs, despite complex licensing and varied returns.
The connection between Power Apps and Power BI simplifies generating and presenting reports, alleviating the workload and enhancing productivity.
The aim is to create a cleaner interface to replace spreadsheets, thus standardizing processes and improving efficiency.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.5
AuraQuantic's customer service is praised for its responsiveness, professionalism, and knowledgeable support team that assists with implementation and troubleshooting.
Sentiment score
6.4
Microsoft Power Apps support varies in responsiveness; technical users report fewer issues, while rapid updates cause confusion.
Their assistance was crucial as we developed the solutions.
A few months ago, I contacted support for an issue, but the response time was longer than expected.
Microsoft's technical support is around a seven to eight.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
9.0
AuraQuantic is highly scalable, accommodating both easy starts and rapid growth, making it ideal for large clients and expanding needs.
Sentiment score
6.7
Microsoft Power Apps' scalability is generally positive, though some encounter licensing challenges and issues with complex, large data sets.
If it is flexible and includes premium connectors, scalability is easy.
It is quite scalable, though there are some limitations regarding the number of records.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.7
AuraQuantic is highly stable, performs excellently on Microsoft Azure, and has no reported issues, earning a ten out of ten.
Sentiment score
7.6
Microsoft Power Apps is stable and reliable, but may slow with large datasets; generally rated 7-9 out of 10.
I would rate the stability of Microsoft Power Apps as a nine out of ten.
 

Room For Improvement

AuraQuantic needs better system integration, extensive documentation, intuitive training, easier customization, and more responsive technical support.
Users want better integration, performance, and customization in Power Apps, with concerns about costs, data handling, and support.
In many use cases, applications might require importing data exceeding two thousand records, potentially reaching one hundred thousand.
These tools should be intuitive for business users who will need at least a week of training to use them effectively.
This would assist business process users who lack coding knowledge.
 

Setup Cost

AuraQuantic provides scalable, transparent pricing with various plans based on deployment options, usage requirements, and number of users.
Microsoft Power Apps pricing is generally reasonable, especially with Office 365, but can increase with premium features and external users.
For small to medium enterprises, it is affordable, especially with Microsoft Enterprise licensing.
For more elaborate work, an upgrade to an enterprise license, costing around $35 per license, is needed.
It is in the middle range and considered reasonable given the current price.
 

Valuable Features

AuraQuantic is a user-friendly, zero-code platform for automating and optimizing processes with quick implementation and reliable support.
Microsoft Power Apps offers seamless data integration, low-code development, and scalability, enhancing business processes within the Microsoft ecosystem.
It integrates seamlessly with Power Automate for process automation and connects with email, SharePoint, Power BI, and MS Teams, facilitating everyday processes.
Canvas Apps provide complete user design flexibility with many connectors to integrate into Microsoft Power Apps, making it efficient to fetch and update information from various data sources such as Dataverse, Excel, SharePoint, and Azure.
The most valuable features for us are predominantly on the user interface front.
 

Categories and Ranking

AuraQuantic
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
19th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (19th), Process Automation (18th), No-Code Development Platforms (7th), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (11th)
Microsoft Power Apps
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
1st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
94
Ranking in other categories
Rapid Application Development Software (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of AuraQuantic is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Power Apps is 15.6%, down from 24.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Low-Code Development Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Emilio Valle - PeerSpot reviewer
Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable
It helped a lot when we started using it with more images. Before, it was basic. With images, it's more effective. Users consider it more animated and user-friendly. We can easily track a process and know exactly where a process is. It's a low-code application. The solution is very easy to use. It is stable and reliable. The solution scales well. Technical support is extremely responsive.
Guhan Eshwar - PeerSpot reviewer
Building tools with user-friendly interfaces abut needs integration improvements
An integration of Copilot options within Microsoft Power Apps would be useful. In UiPath apps, there is an autopilot function that uses a generative AI model, which creates layouts and connects data services automatically with a prompt. Such integration would be beneficial to build basic frameworks that can be enhanced. This would assist business process users who lack coding knowledge.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How would you choose between Microsoft PowerApps and Salesforce Platform?
I think it depends on your use case. If your organization uses Microsoft Enterprise products, PowerApps will work better in your environment. Similarly, if you have a Salesforce integration in pla...
Would you choose ServiceNow over Microsoft PowerApps?
Hi Netanya, I will choose ServiceNow because ServiceNow is a very good tool compared to Microsoft PowerApp. Because ServiceNow has a very strong module (Performance Analysis) reporting which will ...
Would you choose Microsoft Azure App Service or PowerApps?
Microsoft Azure App Service is helpful if you need to set up temporary servers for customers to run their programs in locations that other cloud providers do not cater to. When servers are closer t...
 

Also Known As

No data available
PowerApps, MS PowerApps
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Nissan, RSA Chile, New Millennia Group Plc (UK), TOYOTA, ArcelorMittal Brasil, KPN, Farmacia Luis Corbi, Farmacia del Paseo, Frutas Bean, IncAE Business School, BDO Argentina, Refinery of the Pacific, Balfego Grup, Fundacion Seneca, Technological Institute Maranosa, Coprusa Group, Constructec, University of Deusto, Tenco Shopping Centers, Spanish Railways Foundation, Arbora & Ausonia.
TransAlta, Rackspace, Telstra
Find out what your peers are saying about AuraQuantic vs. Microsoft Power Apps and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.