AuditBoard vs Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) comparison

AuditBoard and Diligent are both solutions in the GRC category. AuditBoard is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while Diligent is ranked #20. AuditBoard holds a 6.0% mindshare in G, compared to Diligent’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of AuditBoard users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Diligent users who would recommend it.

AuditBoard

Read 12 AuditBoard reviews

1,614 Views
1,453 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Diligent One Platform (form...

Read 3 Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) reviews

753 Views
685 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AuditBoard

Diligent One Platform (form...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Diligent One Platform and AuditBoard are competing products in the governance, risk, and compliance sector. AuditBoard is favored for its features, while Diligent appeals through pricing and support.

Features: Diligent One Platform includes robust risk management, governance capabilities, and flexible reporting options. AuditBoard provides comprehensive audit management, streamlined compliance processes, and real-time data analysis features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Diligent One Platform offers versatile deployment options with responsive support. AuditBoard prioritizes straightforward setup and dedicated customer assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Diligent One Platform is noted for competitive pricing and solid ROI. AuditBoard's higher cost is justified by its extensive features, attracting those prioritizing long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed AuditBoard vs. Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AuditBoard vs. Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond)

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,778 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AuditBoard

Ranking in GRC

8th

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Diligent One Platform (form...

Ranking in GRC

20th

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

25th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Governance (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the GRC category, the mindshare of AuditBoard is 6.0%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) is 2.7%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

GRC Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
AuditBoard	6.0%
Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond)	2.7%
Other	91.3%

GRC

Featured Reviews

Gopichand Rajbhar

IT GRC Manager at Capgemini

User-friendly, simple to implement, and has lots of features

There are lots of features. We like the reviewer and auditor, where they support you if you want to upload evidence. At the same time the reviewer or auditor can also put their remark. The solution is user-friendly. It's easy to set up. You can easily find out how to proceed for reassessment, how to upload that evidence, and how you can put in a remark. Everything is a single console where you can easily track what you need. It's stable. The product is scalable. They provide a demo to customers to allow them to explore the tools.

Read full review

WillWillis

Data Analyst at Rhythex

Good automation and analytics, but is costly

The report model was our main concern. I believe currently the solution uses a third party for the reporting. As part of a consulting firm, one of the challenges we face is the difficulty in producing reports that meet the expectations of our clients and customers. It would be beneficial if the focus could be shifted toward improving the reporting aspect. The impact report is a crucial aspect, as we only have one opportunity to create it. Galvanize HighBond can improve by generating more impact reports post-project, and allowing access to the reports using a web version, which would greatly benefit us. The cost of the solution is expensive and needs improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There are lots of features."

"Its ability to share the data in real-time has helped us well."

"The most valuable feature is that everybody can use the same tool. You can give a person permission to use AuditBoard and define their access to the Audit Table. For example, we can allow external auditors or clients to review our completed tests. The clients are attached to specific tests that happen regularly, like inventory counts and asset counts. Debt compliance is only done once annually."

"I find the most significant elements of this solution are the out-of-the-box reporting, the ease of workflow, workflow management, and the ease of managing our audit process."

"For AuditBoard, the simple workflow made it very easy to code with the group."

"In AuditBoard, there are all the audit steps, including documentation, archiving, and tracking the progress of audits."

"AuditBoard is very user-friendly compared to other audit management software I have used in the past."

"The most valuable feature of AuditBoard is its ability to facilitate the editing of work papers in a seamless and efficient manner. This is achieved through a built-in tool that allows for real-time editing without the need for downloading the working paper. This feature has proven to be incredibly time-saving for me as it eliminates the step of having to download the file and make changes, instead providing an easy-to-access "edit work paper" option. Overall, this feature has greatly improved my experience with AuditBoard and has been a significant contributor to its success in my opinion."

More AuditBoard pros

"The most valuable feature is automation."

Cons

"AuditBoard is overly simple in some instances and there needs to be flexibility to make it more robust."

"AuditBoard has the potential for improvement in a few key areas. Firstly, I have experienced instances where the platform has experienced technical issues and ceased to function effectively. Additionally, the editing tools provided within the platform can be slow and laggy, particularly when trying to access and edit important documents. This can be a hindrance to my workflow and efficiency. To address these issues, they should begin by improving the speed and reliability of the platform, as well as enhancing the search engine to make it easier to find specific controls and documents within the platform."

"The layout for the end user could be improved."

"A handful of things in the solution need to be improved. One of them is better communication of updates to the system or tool itself."

"Some of that flexibility could be enhanced. When comparing Archer and TeamMate+, there is a little more open-ended in terms of certain of our audit processes and procedures. And there is significantly greater freedom in creating ad hoc audit processes and procedures, whereas AuditBoard is a little more limiting in this regard."

"After sending out a request to my network for documents, it would be great to have a receipt that shows who received the request and who did not."

"AuditBoard could benefit from the addition of video capabilities, although it is not a necessity. Small companies that cannot afford licenses for Microsoft Teams or Zoom would benefit greatly from this feature, as it would enhance the communication process."

"The initial setup is somewhat difficult because it has multiple pieces that need to be stitched together. You have to integrate it with the business unit you want to test if you want to go down from the corporate level to the operational level."

More AuditBoard cons

"The cost of the solution is expensive and needs improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is variable, like with any technology, and is determined by how hard you wish to negotiate. You can get to a price you're willing to pay if you're willing to negotiate aggressively."

"I highly recommend this tool as the price is reasonable. However, consistent pricing is important, and having a loyalty program that rewards long-term customers with lower prices would be a great addition."

"I give the cost of the solution a six out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AuditBoard?

It consolidates the E2E process in one single solution, and in a very user friendly environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AuditBoard?

AuditBoard is overly simple in some instances and there needs to be flexibility to make it more robust. For IBM OpenPages, the reporting can be more robust as the summary report on each of the modu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AuditBoard?

I used AuditBoard primarily for risk assessment questionnaires in a very premature risk environment. I also have experience with IBM OpenPages, mostly for operational risk to track issues, to look ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Workiva Wdesk vs AuditBoard

Compared 30% of the time

RSA Archer vs AuditBoard

Compared 19% of the time

OneTrust GRC vs AuditBoard

Compared 19% of the time

LogicGate vs AuditBoard

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance vs AuditBoard

Compared 4% of the time

More AuditBoard Competitors

ACL Analytics vs Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond)

Compared 38% of the time

Workiva Wdesk vs Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond)

Compared 18% of the time

RSA Archer vs Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond)

Compared 16% of the time

MetricStream vs Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond)

Compared 11% of the time

OneTrust GRC vs Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond)

Compared 8% of the time

More Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AuditBoard

October 2025

Download AuditBoard product report

Buyer's Guide

GRC

October 2025

Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) report

Download Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) product report

Also Known As

No data available

Rsam GRC, HighBond, HighBond by Galvanize , Diligent GRC Platform

Overview

AuditBoard is the leading cloud-based platform transforming audit, risk, and compliance management. More than 35% of the Fortune 500 leverage AuditBoard to move their businesses forward with greater clarity and agility. AuditBoard is top-rated by customers on G2, Capterra, and Gartner Peer Insights, and was recently ranked for the fourth year in a row as one of the fastest-growing technology companies in North America by Deloitte. To learn more, visit: AuditBoard.com.

AuditBoard

Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) offers a comprehensive solution for risk management, audit, and compliance needs, enabling businesses to streamline processes and enhance operational efficiency.

Leveraging advanced technology, Diligent One Platform integrates multiple functionalities to provide extensive support in governance, risk management, and compliance across enterprises. It consolidates data and automates workflows, allowing teams to focus on strategic initiatives rather than repetitive tasks. Designed for scalability, it accommodates the needs of large organizations while maintaining flexibility.

What are the key features of Diligent One Platform?

Integrated Workflows: Automates and coordinates tasks for improved efficiency.
Real-time Analytics: Provides data-driven insights and supports decision-making.
Customizable Dashboards: Offers tailored views for monitoring and reporting progress.
Regulatory Compliance: Ensures adherence to industry standards and regulations.
Collaboration Tools: Enhances team communication and documentation sharing.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from Diligent One Platform?

Operational Efficiency: Streamlines processes to reduce time and resource expenditure.
Cost Savings: Minimizes manual tasks leading to reduced operational costs.
Risk Mitigation: Predicts and addresses potential risks proactively.
Strategic Focus: Frees up resources for strategic growth and innovation.
Enhanced Compliance: Maintains compliance effortlessly, avoiding regulatory fines.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, Diligent One Platform is applied to monitor compliance and optimize risk management efforts. By integrating seamlessly with existing systems, it supports sector-specific regulations and requirements, delivering impactful results in diverse environments.

Diligent

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

CNA Insurance

Buyer's Guide

AuditBoard vs. Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond)

September 2025

Free Report: AuditBoard vs. Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond)

Find out what your peers are saying about AuditBoard vs. Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AuditBoard vs. Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) report.

See our list of best GRC vendors and best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.