We performed a comparison between Atlassian Confluence and SAP Jam based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software."The most valuable feature of Atlassian Confluence is the ability to access your files from anywhere."
"Atlassian Confluence's most valuable features are the ease in which you can use the tool, the flexibility in creating folder structures, receiving notifications in case others put remarks on the documents, and working together on documents."
"Confluence is easy to use and integrate with other solutions, including social media platforms."
"The interface is good....I didn't face any issues with the scalability. It was very good."
"The trial stages, the ability to connect it to Jira, and the ability to export in PDF are all good capabilities."
"What I find the most valuable about Confluence is how easy it is to use."
"The scalability is enough for our use cases. It covers all our needs."
"As for valuable features, the team management features help us to share information very easily."
"One notable feature is the "improvement training," which allows you to define groups, facilitate information sharing, enable participant rating, and establish rankings. This enables you to identify which participants are actively engaged and sharing information and which ones are less active."
"The one way in which this solution could be improved is by offering better design and UI."
"RAM usage seems to be higher than it should be."
"I would like Confluence to include the ability to draw flowcharts and diagrams."
"The scalability for larger companies could be improved."
"Confluence could incorporate stronger records management and automation features. The current management structure is too open, which becomes an issue."
"When we have a project that we don't want to share with everybody but want people to know that it exists, there is no way to do this in Confluence. When a project is not shared, people cannot see that it exits."
"The UI is good but bland. It could be updated a bit to make it more modern and interesting to look at."
"Space maintenance could be made a little more user-friendly."
"I'm hopeful for more integrations with SAP JAM in the future."
Atlassian Confluence is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Social Software with 99 reviews while SAP Jam is ranked 7th in Enterprise Social Software with 5 reviews. Atlassian Confluence is rated 8.2, while SAP Jam is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Atlassian Confluence writes "Good usability, helpful community support, and facilitates well-structured documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Jam writes "A powerful tool for managing subscriptions within the organization". Atlassian Confluence is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Office 365, Microsoft OneDrive, SharePoint and Zendesk, whereas SAP Jam is most compared with SharePoint, Yammer, Adobe Experience Manager and Microsoft 365 Business.
See our list of best Enterprise Social Software vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.