No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Assembla Workspaces vs NMQA QABook comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Assembla Workspaces
Ranking in Defect Tracking
3rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
NMQA QABook
Ranking in Defect Tracking
7th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Defect Tracking category, the mindshare of Assembla Workspaces is 11.9%, up from 9.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NMQA QABook is 9.0%, down from 10.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Defect Tracking Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Assembla Workspaces11.9%
NMQA QABook9.0%
Other79.1%
Defect Tracking
 

Featured Reviews

it_user4230 - PeerSpot reviewer
VP of Product at a legal firm with 51-200 employees
Agile development with source control
Love the way everything about a product/project can be included in my Assembla space. All the source code, check-in history, requirements, etc. There's a terrific Lean/Agile workflow system with the cardwall. The search could still be improved, but overall it's a very solid…
Use NMQA QABook?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Defect Tracking solutions are best for your needs.
920,223 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Also Known As

No data available
QABook
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

eBay, PayPal, Microsoft, INTUIT, HTC, HP
Capgemini, Queensland Government, Etihad Airways, CGI