We performed a comparison between Arbor DDoS and Neustar UltraDDoS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare, NETSCOUT, Akamai and others in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection."I like all the features together as a whole."
"The quality of the technical support provided by Arbor DDoS is premium."
"In the GUI, the packet capture is a very good option, as is the option to block an IP address."
"Arbor DDoS is easy to use, provides effective blocking of DDoS attacks, and can be used for DNS, web, and main servers. Additionally, this solution is far easier to operate than others solutions, such as Fortinet DDoS."
"The auto-mitigation, that signaling feature, where it automatically raises an alarm that a line is under attack, is important. The upstream service provider will then do something to reduce the load on our internet lines. The fact that it's automated means I don't have to sit and always be looking at threats coming through. It does it almost automatically, without any intervention by me."
"The solution is easy to use."
"Arbor DDoS offers security features that automatically detect and prevent DDoS attacks."
"Its scalability is big. It is for large deployments of big organizations and service providers."
"In the DDoS it's difficult to validate what is a genuine request from an end user. We've started being able to do that with the logistics that they have set up. With the protection that they have provided, they are able to identify what is valid and what is not valid. We see that a person who is getting DDoS Neustar service is able to block that particular user. However, while they are doing that it doesn't affect other customers on the server."
"The following areas need improvement: opening and tracking support tickets, online support resources, software upgrades/updates and replacement media, and event management guidelines."
"The upgrade process is mildly complex requiring treatment of the custom embedded OS separately from the application. The correlation of the underling OS to the application version can be easily missed."
"Arbor DDoS could improve out-of-the-box reporting, it could be better."
"An issue which needs to be addressed concerns information I received of attacks on the radar and Arbor, allegedly, not taking any action."
"The solution could be more granular to include logs per second and enhanced pipeline monitoring for router licenses."
"The implementation should be made easier."
"I think the diversity of protection is extremely limited. It must be expanded in future upgrades and versions."
"An improvement would be to provide information on how pricing is done on different customer levels."
"I would like to see a dashboard that shows you the data that is transferred from which end. It's where people start looking at abuse management. People keep questioning when the mitigation is on what service it is and how many GBs are passing through. An end user dashboard that will help you identify all of these questions and that can be visible in your entire organization is something that would make sense."
Earn 20 points
Arbor DDoS is ranked 2nd in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 15 reviews while Neustar UltraDDoS is ranked 28th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection. Arbor DDoS is rated 8.6, while Neustar UltraDDoS is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Arbor DDoS writes "A tool with great technical support that offers protection against DDoS attacks". On the other hand, Arbor DDoS is most compared with Radware DefensePro, Cloudflare, Imperva DDoS, Corero and Fortinet FortiDDoS, whereas Neustar UltraDDoS is most compared with Cloudflare.
See our list of best Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection vendors.
We monitor all Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.