We performed a comparison between Aqua Security Platform and SUSE NeuVector based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Aqua Security Platform is appreciated for its container security and malware detection capabilities. SUSE NeuVector has been praised for its comprehensive feature set, informative dashboard, and impressive performance. Aqua Security Platform could improve its automated reporting and log forwarding while decreasing resource consumption and making integration more seamless. SUSE NeuVector could add support for IaaS and virtual machine scanning, enhance integration with other security tools in hybrid environments, and raise visibility into the DevSecOps pipeline.
Service and Support: Aqua Security Platform's customer service is generally considered prompt and supportive. However, a few users have mentioned having to resolve problems on their own. SUSE NeuVector's support is known for being knowledgeable and helpful, but some users find the process challenging to navigate.
Ease of Deployment: Aqua Security Platform users reported that the complexity, difficulty, and time needed to set up the platform can vary depending on the user's experience and environment. SUSE NeuVector's setup is considered to be moderately difficult.
Pricing: The cost of Aqua Security Platform falls within the average range. It's less expensive than some alternatives, but others noted that it isn't cheap. Some SUSE NeuVector users consider it inexpensive, but others say there is room for improvement.
ROI: Aqua Security Platform delivers value by offering accurate and up-to-date information. SUSE NeuVector is particularly advantageous for high-risk industries such as financial services.
Comparison Results: Aqua Security Platform outperforms SUSE NeuVector in several aspects. Users appreciate Aqua Security Platform for its ease of setup, extensive range of features, on-demand patching, and excellent customer service. SUSE NeuVector has been criticized for its complex setup process and reliance on custom scripts for integration. Users reported problems with inadequate documentation and limited integration options.
"Aqua Security allowed us to gain visibility into the vulnerabilities that were present in the container images, that were being rolled out, the amount of risk that we were introducing to the platform, and provided us a look into the container environment by introducing access control mechanisms. In addition, when it came to runtime-level policies, we could restrict container access to resources in our environment, such as network-level or other application-level access."
"Valuable features include the ability to connect it to our Docker Hub where our images are stored, good integration with Slack, and the connection to the CV, to easily see which CVs are on each image."
"The most valuable features are that it's easy to use and manage."
"The most valuable feature of Aqua Security is the scanner."
"The DTA, which stands for Dynamic Threat Analysis, allows me to analyze Docker images in a sandbox environment before deployment, helping me anticipate risks."
"The solution was very user-friendly."
"The most helpful feature of Aqua Security is Drift Prevention, which is a feature that allows images to be immutable. In addition, one of the main reasons we went with Aqua Security is because it provides strong protection when it comes to runtime security."
"The CSPM product is great at securing our cloud accounts and I really like the runtime protection for containers and functions too."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is the performance, deployment, and cost."
"The UI has a lot of features."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security."
"The tool's deployment is simple. Also, I am impressed with its risk capabilities."
"The features of image scanning and anti-malware are really valuable."
"The initial setup is quite good, it's straightforward."
"When it comes to the price, we got a really good deal from the vendor instantly."
"The integrations on CICD could be improved. If Aqua had more plugins or container images to integrate and automate more easily on CICD, it would be better."
"They want to release improvements to their product to work with other servers because now there are more focused on the Kubernetes environment. They need to improve the normal servers. I would like to have more options."
"The solution could improve user-friendliness."
"The user interface could be improved, especially in terms of organization and clarity."
"There's room for improvement, particularly in management capabilities as it may not be comprehensive enough for all customers, and it has been lacking in the realm of cloud security posture management."
"Aqua Security could provide more open documentation so that their learning resources can be more easily accessed and searched through online. Right now, a lot of the documentation is closed and not available to the public."
"Since we are working from home, we would like to have the proper training for Aqua."
"Aqua Security lacks a lot in reporting."
"The image-scanning features need improvement."
"We are also working with IaaS VMS, but NeuVector doesn't support virtual machines."
"I would say that this solution should improve monitoring and reporting. I would also like to see more integrations so that we could essentially make it a part of a developing pipeline."
"SUSE NeuVector could improve by increasing its visibility into other elements of the DevSecOps pipeline. Additionally, scanning around infrastructure would be helpful."
"The tool should offer seamless integration of other security tools while in a hybrid environment."
"SUSE NeuVector should provide more security protection rules and better container image scanning."
"The documentation needs to improve a bit."
Aqua Cloud Security Platform is ranked 6th in Container Security with 16 reviews while SUSE NeuVector is ranked 17th in Container Security with 7 reviews. Aqua Cloud Security Platform is rated 8.2, while SUSE NeuVector is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Aqua Cloud Security Platform writes "A robust and cost-effective solution, excelling in scalability, on-premises support, and responsive technical support, making it well-suited for enterprises navigating stringent regulatory environment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SUSE NeuVector writes "Good value for money; great for policy management". Aqua Cloud Security Platform is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Snyk, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes and Qualys VMDR, whereas SUSE NeuVector is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Sysdig Falco, Sysdig Secure and Snyk. See our Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs. SUSE NeuVector report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors and best CWPP (Cloud Workload Protection Platforms) vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.