

Acunetix and Aqua Cloud Security Platform both compete in the security solutions category, targeting web application and cloud-native environments respectively. Acunetix appears to have an upper hand in web application security due to its effective false positive reduction and ease in DevOps integration, whereas Aqua excels in cloud-native security with its extensive container and Kubernetes protections.
Features: Acunetix focuses on web application security by providing comprehensive reports, automated scans for vulnerabilities like SQL injections, cross-site scripting, and integration with CI/CD pipelines. It is appreciated for its flexibility in deployment and manual retesting reduction through minimized false positives. Aqua Cloud Security Platform specializes in cloud-native environments, supporting diverse deployment options and providing container and Kubernetes security, runtime protection, and integration into the DevOps lifecycle, offering centralized views on security posture with risk prioritization.
Room for Improvement: Acunetix needs enhancements in reducing false positives even further, modern authentication support, and scalability for large-scale operations. Its high cost and limited reporting customization are other concerns. Aqua Cloud Security Platform could improve reporting intelligence, streamline its UX, and enhance CI/CD integration. Users also note areas like initial policy tuning, documentation access, and making pricing more accessible for larger deployments as areas needing focus.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix is recognized for its straightforward deployment options across on-premise and cloud, with responsive 24/7 support although delays occur sometimes. Aqua Cloud Security Platform, while adaptable to diverse environments, could better its onboarding process; its support team is appreciated for rapid responses, yet it could enhance user experience for newcomers.
Pricing and ROI: Acunetix's pricing is viewed as high, with a target-based licensing model, seen as restrictive by some users but offering ROI through improved security and quicker vulnerability remediation. Transparency in pricing is desired. Aqua Cloud Security Platform offers competitive pricing advantageous for cloud-native applications, contributing to robust security posture, though larger enterprise pricing remains a discussion point. Investments in both platforms highlight tangible returns through effective vulnerability management.
The impact can reduce remediation effort by 40% to 60%, avoiding production-level fixes which are costlier.
The main measurable benefits are faster identification and remediation of findings, fewer issues progressing to later stages, and reduced manual effort for repetitive security checks.
It is generally used for the DevSecOps pipeline to scan the entire SAST, DAST, or ISC, performing excellently in that area.
It saves a significant amount of time by covering attack surfaces.
I have seen a return on investment, as Acunetix helps reduce the man-days and effort needed for scanning bulk applications through automated assessments.
On a scale of one to ten, I would rate the customer support for Aqua Cloud Security Platform a ten out of ten.
The customer support for Aqua Cloud Security Platform is excellent, available 24/7, and provides better solutions for any issues raised through tickets.
The customer support has been responsive and knowledgeable.
For high-severity issues, they reach out within two to three hours, and for critical issues, a response is received within 15 minutes.
The technical support from Invicti is very good and fast.
Support staff not being familiar with the problem.
I find Aqua Cloud Security Platform reasonably scalable because it can support security checks across multiple cloud workloads, container images, Kubernetes environments, and CI/CD pipelines without requiring a proportional increase in manual effort.
Aqua Cloud Security Platform has good scalability because it is a SaaS platform, so I do not need to think much about scalability.
Aqua Cloud Security Platform did not seem to have any issues with scaling.
Acunetix can handle increasing workloads and more applications easily.
Regarding stability with Aqua Cloud Security Platform, I did not experience any problems.
Risk prioritization in security graphs is a point where Aqua Cloud Security Platform is less mature than Wiz, which excels at identifying critical vulnerabilities as a single attack path.
For the licensing part and AI-driven prioritization, this needs improvement. While Aqua Cloud Security Platform prioritizes findings using CVSS and policy context, if we compare it with Wiz and Prisma Cloud, they are increasingly using AI-driven risk scoring that incorporates exploitability, identity exposure, internet reachability, and business context.
There should be stronger automation for creating tickets and tracking remediation through closure, which is particularly useful for day-to-day security operations.
The main concern is related to false positives; Acunetix needs to work on identifying valid and invalid findings.
I could supply it with maybe a Swagger file or a JSON file, and Acunetix would pick it up, scan all the endpoints according to the OWASP Top Ten, and give me remediation and actionable remediation reports.
Acunetix should have better integration with newer tools such as GitHub and Azure DevOps.
Compared to other vendors, Aqua Cloud Security Platform's pricing is good or lesser.
The license and setup costs have been reasonable, though a challenge arises when deploying the entire application in our own cloud, as we must manage everything from scratch.
Overall, it is good. Not too high, not too low.
The pricing cost is affordable for small and mid-sized organizations, and when compared to Checkmarx, it is significantly affordable, as Checkmarx is quite expensive.
We secured a special licensing model for penetration testing companies, which is cost-effective.
The pricing of Acunetix is pretty expensive and could be improved.
Aqua provides end-to-end security across containers, Kubernetes, serverless, and cloud workloads starting from build, deployment, runtime, and compliance in one platform.
Aqua Cloud Security Platform positively impacted my organization by allowing deployment from code to cloud in the entire CI/CD pipeline, with excellent capabilities and recent AI application security that is useful in the DevSecOps platform.
The best feature of Aqua Cloud Security Platform is the Kubernetes security, which secures admission controllers, runtime policies, namespace protection, and RBAC and pod security.
Its most valuable role is in enhancing security by identifying potential vulnerabilities efficiently.
The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.
The best feature Acunetix offers is the centralized dashboard and the quality of reports it generates, which includes various options for selecting reports and developer options for directly sharing the reports with developers.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Acunetix | 5.5% |
| Aqua Cloud Security Platform | 3.8% |
| Other | 90.7% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
Aqua Cloud Security Platform supports container environments with strong features such as Docker and Kubernetes integration, efficient vulnerability management, and seamless runtime protection, making it a key choice for cloud and container security.
Aqua Cloud Security Platform focuses on comprehensive container and cloud security enhancements. It offers robust tools for Docker and Kubernetes, efficient vulnerability management, and on-demand patching. The platform is praised for its Runtime Protection, Drift Prevention, and robust documentation, promoting seamless integration with existing platforms. Image scanning, Digital Threat Analysis, and sandboxing services accentuate security measures while integration with Docker Hub ensures ease of use. Scalable runtime policies, image assurance, and dynamic threat analysis simplify security tasks. Challenges remain in developing web security portals and greater standard server integration. Enhancing reporting, simplifying training, and improving log forwarding are key goals. Resource consumption, clearer roles, automation, and code analysis are vital future considerations.
What are the most important features of Aqua Cloud Security Platform?Aqua Cloud Security Platform is leveraged in industries focusing on container security, vulnerability scanning, and securing Kubernetes configurations within CI/CD pipelines. It is employed for image assessments and network security, demonstrating its efficacy in cloud applications and workload protection. Efficiently identifying misconfigurations and risks in cloud environments, it provides scanning for public clouds and docker environments, emphasizing data protection and application visibility tailored to customer-specific deployments.
Acunetix is a robust web application security testing tool offering rapid scanning, user-friendly interfaces, and accurate vulnerability detection with minimal false positives. It supports both cloud and on-premises deployment, making it versatile for various security needs.
Acunetix is distinguished by its capability to identify critical vulnerabilities such as cross-site scripting and SQL injection with high precision. It integrates seamlessly with CI/CD tools, supporting continuous scanning and large-scale application management. The centralized dashboard and detailed automated reporting streamline operations. Despite its benefits, users suggest improvements like reducing false positives, flexible pricing, and enhanced API scanning. Better integration with platforms like GitHub and Azure DevOps is sought, alongside more comprehensive customization and faster scanning. Mobile application scanning and improved team collaboration tools are also desired.
What features make Acunetix stand out?Acunetix is widely implemented across industries undertaking web application security assessments, including those requiring penetration testing and vulnerability assessment. It ensures applications meet security protocols and complies with standards while fitting into CI/CD workflows for secure pre-release checks.
We monitor all DevSecOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.