We performed a comparison between Appian and TIBCO iProcess Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Compared to other code tools that I've seen, Appian has a more robust rules engine"
"The solution has a lot of strong features for the financial industry, it is very easy to use."
"Appian has many valuable features, the first being the ease of development—rapid development. Second, the process of learning the product and tool is faster when compared to its peers in the market. It's closer to low-code, and while it's still not very easy, it's more low-code than other products in the industry. Appian has a good user interface, a seamless model user interface, which comes without additional coding. It can also integrate with multiple systems."
"Recently, we added Appian Process Mining, Appian Portals, and now Appian RPA."
"Rapid development with low-code makes it easier to quickly get apps implemented and the time to break-even and ROI is much faster."
"It has good integrations. We were looking for out-of-the-box integration with both on-prem and publicly accessible data sources. We needed integration with the cloud, OData, our REST API feed, and then on-prem passthrough to go to a SQL database or on-prem APIs through Azure local deployment, etc."
"It's heavy on business processing in terms of logic, process workflows, and primarily on the process design modeler. Appian is really great at that. In terms of the full stack set from a low-code platform perspective, it's definitely an eye opener since it can be deployed via mobile app and on the web as well."
"There is a version coming out every six months with performance improvements."
"It's very simple to use and the integration features between Java and other services within the workflow are very easy."
"One of the areas that Appian is working on is to improve its UI capabilities and give more flexibility to the UI."
"We would like to have more granular control for interface styling."
"We have clients that want to use Office 365, Microsoft Analytics, and Power Apps. Appian just isn't the same as using something specifically designed to cater to the Microsoft Suite."
"Even though the company has made great improvements in online documentation, featuring rich material which includes case studies of real-life use cases, the material could definitely be better in quality and coverage of use cases."
"Something I would like to see improved is an SQL database connection."
"Form creation and SAIL proprietary language still basically require programming. The claim a BA type can do everything is hogwash."
"The graphical user interface could be easier to use. It should be simplified."
"There could be a scope of enhancement for capturing the variety of use cases."
"Our customers and developers have complained that the UI is a little bit confusing."
Earn 20 points
Appian is ranked 4th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews while TIBCO iProcess Suite is ranked 40th in Business Process Management (BPM). Appian is rated 8.4, while TIBCO iProcess Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO iProcess Suite writes "An easy-to-use solution with great integration". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Camunda, ServiceNow and Pega BPM, whereas TIBCO iProcess Suite is most compared with Apache Airflow, TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM and Pega BPM. See our Appian vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.