

Appian and PagerDuty Operations Cloud both compete in the automation and incident management category. Appian seems to have the upper hand with its process automation and integration capabilities, reducing error rates and enhancing efficiency for businesses.
Features: Appian offers a low-code platform focused on rapid application development, ensuring data consistency and providing seamless integration capabilities. Key features include AI-driven functionalities, robust process modeling, and efficient remittance processing, which are particularly beneficial for businesses seeking fast automation. PagerDuty Operations Cloud is equipped for efficient incident management, featuring AI-driven alert grouping, extensive runbooks, and real-time notification integrations, catering to organizations aiming for quick response times and minimized downtime.
Room for Improvement: Appian could improve UI flexibility for mobile applications and optimize memory utilization for complex processes. Enhancements in geo-location tagging and external use cases would benefit public-facing applications. PagerDuty Operations Cloud could enhance noise suppression, reporting, and cost-effectiveness for smaller teams. Simplifying alert configurations, improving integrations, and offering advanced analytics would further improve user experience and operational efficiency.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Appian and PagerDuty Operations Cloud offer flexible deployment options, including cloud and on-premises setups. Appian's support is known for responsiveness and effectiveness, although it could benefit from quicker response times for complex queries. PagerDuty Operations Cloud is praised for its quick setup and reliability but could improve configuration processes and support for newcomers. Appian tends to provide more consistent customer support, whereas PagerDuty Operations Cloud could offer better customization guidance and simplify initial setup for complex configurations.
Pricing and ROI: Appian’s pricing is considered high but justified by extensive features and support, offering significant ROI through time and cost savings, notably improving remittance speed. PagerDuty Operations Cloud, although costly, is perceived as cost-effective for medium to large enterprises due to reliable alerting and operational efficiency gains. Both provide efficiency-driven ROI, but their pricing models may deter smaller businesses. Appian emphasizes value in automation investments, whereas PagerDuty Operations Cloud offers scalable pricing focused on reliability in incident handling.
Using Appian is saving us five full-time employees, which is significant since we currently have only four team members.
They see return on investment in terms of cost savings, time savings, more efficient processes, and more efficient employees.
Appian is very efficient, allowing us to build a lot of applications within a financial year, making it cost-effective.
The escalation was not possible at all before, which led to the L1 team being under too much stress.
The alert reduction feature has greatly impacted our ability to prevent costly incidents, as we can accurately respond to alerts with the help of autonomous AI agents, which reduces erroneous notifications.
We definitely save time with PagerDuty Operations Cloud. It saves more than half an hour—30 minutes—for each incident.
I would give Appian's customer support 10 out of 10 due to their next-level support.
Their customer service is responsive, and the team is very prompt for support.
The technical support for Appian rates as 10 out of 10 because they have a great support team.
PagerDuty Operations Cloud is a good product for the organization and the support team is highly effective and responsive.
We have standing weekly calls to discuss any doubts, and there is a dedicated team, including an engineer and a PagerDuty Relations Manager, assigned to support us.
we have never had an issue when reaching out to someone in customer service
On a scale of one to 10, Appian rates as a nine for scalability.
Our volume has increased by 20% in the two years since using Appian, and it can handle the increased volume effectively.
Initially, without much coding, I can easily handle five thousand records.
Scalability for PagerDuty Operations Cloud is excellent, and I rate it at 9.9.
Whatever top-notch tools we are using as an enterprise solution, PagerDuty Operations Cloud has kept itself current and integrates nicely with all the tools we use these days.
We are able to extend our PagerDuty Operations Cloud configuration without major challenges or changes to our overall operational model.
We have tested Appian during peak usage and off-peak times, and we have not experienced any issues such as lagging or system disruptions.
It depends on how it has been designed and how it has been configured.
The stability of Appian would rate as nine, as it's a stable environment.
We have never experienced any downtime or latency issues from PagerDuty Operations Cloud.
It never breaks down for us, and considering I have devoted 20 years of my career to IT infrastructure operations, where everything typically breaks down, including Jira and ServiceNow, it is impressive to say that PagerDuty Operations Cloud has not caused disruptions.
PagerDuty Operations Cloud is the most stable solution.
It has room to improve for use cases where the users are public facing, where anonymous users could come to a site and run a business workflow or interact with some data.
Appian can be improved by adding a geo-location tagging feature, which would be really helpful for identifying remitter addresses.
I think Appian could improve by adding its own native GenAI and agentic capabilities.
It would be useful to have a way to define all configurations in code that is similar to how Terraform operates.
With many new members, they need training to set up runbook workflows, event orchestration, and manage complex on-call schedules across 23 services, making it a challenge for new users.
Additionally, I think a sandbox mode would be helpful for new team members, allowing us to guide them in simulating alerts, performing escalation policies, and creating PagerDuty Operations Cloud channels.
Appian provides value for money, is easy to use, has a straightforward setup procedure, and offers great support from the Appian team.
On the pricier side, both Appian and Pega are enterprise-level solutions, placing them on the slightly higher side.
The pricing of Appian is based on the number of users and generally ranges from 70 to 100 USD per user per month.
I had around seven users part of it for a base pricing of around $450 per user, primarily for custom workflows and the ITSM part.
The pricing for PagerDuty Operations Cloud is a bit expensive, especially for startups like us, compared to the other platform which I mentioned, which is Rootly.
Licensing is straightforward but scaling seats for larger teams can get expensive, especially when adding advanced features.
The zero-code integration feature is remarkable, allowing for ease of data transfer and workflow enhancement.
Appian is aiding in leveraging AI technologies in multiple ways: one way is for developers, as they make development efficient and quick by enabling developer co-pilots across various phases of the application, which helps design Appian quickly and provides suggestions along the way.
After switching to Appian, it can extract data from MT103, eliminating the need for manual data entry.
It integrates with multiple applications and is highly customizable, with policies, escalation procedures, and an event routing tool that ensures contacting the right person.
In addition to those features, I also find the integration and reporting aspects of PagerDuty Operations Cloud valuable, as it records all triggered calls and incidents, enabling us to analyze patterns and identify the times when systems go down, thus assisting us in understanding and addressing the underlying causes.
Before, setting up everything was very difficult. Now, we don't have to think about it. We can simply set it up in PagerDuty and it works.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| PagerDuty Operations Cloud | 0.7% |
| Appian | 5.1% |
| Other | 94.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 46 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 31 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 22 |
| Large Enterprise | 76 |
Appian provides AI automation for critical processes. The platform orchestrates AI agents, people, and systems within unified, governed workflows, giving AI the structure, data, and controls required for reliable enterprise value. The result is end-to-end automation that replaces fragmented manual work at scale.
PagerDuty Operations Cloud focuses on efficient incident management, featuring advanced alert and notification systems, mobile alerts, and AI-driven functionalities that facilitate streamlined on-call schedules and integrations with major monitoring tools.
PagerDuty Operations Cloud offers comprehensive incident management with real-time alerts and notifications via mobile, SMS, and calls. This empowers teams to respond swiftly and reduce missed incidents. Efficient on-call management through automated scheduling and escalation enhances team productivity, while AI-driven alert grouping minimizes noise. Integration with tools like AWS and Datadog further streamlines operations.
What are the key features of PagerDuty Operations Cloud?PagerDuty Operations Cloud implementation spans industries like e-commerce and IT services, where it automates anomaly detection and manages high-severity incidents. Its integration capabilities and AIOps features significantly enhance incident management, proving valuable for sectors demanding real-time performance and responsiveness.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.