AWS Auto Scaling vs AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring and AWS Auto Scaling based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed AWS Auto Scaling vs. AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is a stable solution that helps address user issues well.""The most valuable feature is the one that enables you to have visibility into the end-users journey.""AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring provides smooth connectivity to different applications.""We used AppDynamics to identify gaps and bottlenecks in the software.""One noteworthy feature is user journey analysis, which enables tracking user interactions and conversion paths on a website.""It provides a lot of data, so it helps businesses identify their user base.""We can see the customer's path from their computer to the backend systems.""The feature we find most valuable, is that the solution creates a unified platform making it really easy to pinpoint a problem, and then drill down into a transaction to resolve the issue."

More AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring Pros →

"The tool gives you the flexibility to scale up and grow. The solution is also fast to deploy.""The solution helps optimize the cost of the AWS environment.""It is a stable platform.""When a lot of traffic comes into our organization, the product scales our instances based on our environment’s requirements.""It helps us to reduce the cost.""The health check integration feature ensures that the instances are healthy and capable of absorbing traffic, thus serving their purpose effectively.""The good thing about Autoscaling is that it provides the capacity to minimize downtime. So, it gives you the assurance of stability and robustness within your system.""The solution's monitoring effectively monitors our application and CPU utilization."

More AWS Auto Scaling Pros →

Cons
"They do not have robust documentation.""I would like to see support for mobile testing and mobile monitoring.""AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring needs to offer an end-to-end experience, including the internet layer and third-party elements that come into play on websites.""The pricing falls within the mid-range category.""The interface and user experience could be better.""I would like to have customizable dashboards to use when I am monitoring certain applications.""AppD is really cool and a unified solution for both APM and APM centric Analytics side. We can show almost all business data within the APM context from the end-user perspetive. But this process is a little bit manual. If they catch and map business journeys based on customer interaction on the browser automatically, it should be really fine.""We would like to be able to easily use this solution to monitor our Java script based browsers, which are currently blocked by the security settings."

More AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring Cons →

"AWS Auto Scaling's documentation could be better.""It has latency issues. It depends on the distribution used, whether it's Amazon Linux, Windows Linux, etc. Occasionally, there are latency issues, which might lead to slower performance.""The product’s pricing needs improvement.""The product’s security features need improvement.""The solution must improve automation.""The speed of the solution must be improved.""The only area of improvement is the speed at which servers are launched. When cleaning up to six servers at a time, it can take up to 15 to 20 minutes to launch new servers.""It could be cheaper."

More AWS Auto Scaling Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This price of this product is expensive."
  • "AppDynamics is more expensive than competitors."
  • "AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring does have licensing cost associated with it."
  • "AppDynamics does not usually do monthly payments. They do it on an annual basis, at the very least."
  • "We have two different licensing models for this solution. One of them is the agent based model, which requires payment per agent. The other is an infrastructure based model, where the price is based on the CPU core. For the infrastructure model wholesale level pricing applies. All of the up to date licensing prices for this product are available on the manufacturers website."
  • "The pricing needs to come down."
  • More AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is good. I have not had any customers that have complained about the price."
  • "AWS Auto Scaling's price is high."
  • "The product has moderate pricing."
  • "The product is expensive."
  • "AWS Auto Scaling is a cheap solution."
  • More AWS Auto Scaling Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring provides smooth connectivity to different applications.
    Top Answer:AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring is costly. If I have to rate the pricing, I would say seven because it's really expensive, with one being low and ten being high. The pricing needs to come… more »
    Top Answer:In user monitoring, AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring should provide a better user experience. It needs to offer an end-to-end experience, including the internet layer and third-party elements… more »
    Top Answer:The solution's monitoring effectively monitors our application and CPU utilization.
    Top Answer:The solution's infrastructure scalability and elasticity could be improved.
    Ranking
    Views
    758
    Comparisons
    595
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    609
    Rating
    8.2
    Views
    312
    Comparisons
    235
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    305
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    AWS Auto-Scaling
    Learn More
    Overview

    How do real users experience your browser-based applications? Using browser real-user monitoring follow their journey and optimize their experience with powerful end-to-end performance management that rapidly identifies application issues and relevant business transactions, and dramatically reduces MTTR.

    AWS Auto Scaling monitors your applications and automatically adjusts capacity to maintain steady, predictable performance at the lowest possible cost. Using AWS Auto Scaling, it’s easy to setup application scaling for multiple resources across multiple services in minutes. The service provides a simple, powerful user interface that lets you build scaling plans for resources including Amazon EC2 instances and Spot Fleets, Amazon ECS tasks, Amazon DynamoDB tables and indexes, and Amazon Aurora Replicas. AWS Auto Scaling makes scaling simple with recommendations that allow you to optimize performance, costs, or balance between them. If you’re already using Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling to dynamically scale your Amazon EC2 instances, you can now combine it with AWS Auto Scaling to scale additional resources for other AWS services. With AWS Auto Scaling, your applications always have the right resources at the right time.

    Sample Customers
    Sony, DirecTV, UBS, The Container Store, The Neta Porter Group, Nasdaq, Cisco, eHarmony, Hallmark, Overstock, Expedia
    Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Retailer6%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company33%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Retailer11%
    Training & Coaching Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Government15%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Large Enterprise62%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise4%
    Large Enterprise73%
    Buyer's Guide
    AWS Auto Scaling vs. AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Auto Scaling vs. AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring is ranked 23rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 14 reviews while AWS Auto Scaling is ranked 26th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 11 reviews. AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring is rated 8.2, while AWS Auto Scaling is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring writes "End-to-end visibility, feature-rich, but the support could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AWS Auto Scaling writes "The product helps reduce costs and avoids interruptions to the customer experience". AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring is most compared with Elastic Observability, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and Akamai mPulse, whereas AWS Auto Scaling is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security. See our AWS Auto Scaling vs. AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring report.

    See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.