Apica vs Nastel AutoPilot Comparison 2024

Apica

Nastel AutoPilot

Apica

Read 4 Apica reviews

904 views|550 comparisons

Nastel AutoPilot

Read 4 Nastel AutoPilot reviews

166 views|117 comparisons

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the complete report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

April 2024

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apica and Nastel AutoPilot based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).

Download the complete report

769,334 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Featured Review

Mohammad AlShbou

Systems Engineer at a tech services company

Detects any issue on any website or any API, makes it easy to determine and identify the issue – where the issue is

I have two applications, one on the iOS platform and another on Android. I used to monitor those applications' APIs, such as the login API, where... Read more →

Anonymous User

Global Head of Performance and Service Metrics at a consultancy

You can easily scale it for high message rates, but it's primarily a flow-monitoring tool rather than an APM.

Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing and licensing are very reasonable. At the end of the day, you are using their technology/software and getting X amount of checks for a very decent value. As for discounts, they try to meet your budgets as much as they can. For example, if you need 100 checks and you have X amount of budget for it, then they will try and get down to that price. Costing-wise, it is a reasonably cost product. They will always try and come down to your price if you need them to come down to it by knocking off certain areas."

"Apica is pretty cost-effective if you buy both solutions together: Synthetic and LoadTest. If you are going for one solution, the cost is on par with any tool in the market."

"The level of alerting accuracy has saved us time and money in operational costs. Overall, it has automated a lot of the manual efforts which have been more complex with some of our other scripting tools or monitors. So, it brings things together by doing things faster and saves us money."

"License management is another area that Apica could do better. We have already had these conversations with our account teams. This is something that they are looking at largely improving in upcoming releases. I believe that this is already on their roadmap."

"The pricing is very reasonable, but it is not cheap."

"Another main difference between Apica and the other products was the cost. We really thought that the balance in Apica between the features and costs was the best among all the products on which we did a PoC."

"The solution's pricing is not cheap, but it is in the midrange."

"The pricing is fair. It is neither too cheap nor too expensive."

More Apica Pricing and Cost Advice →

Information Not Available

See Which Vendors Are Best For You

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See Recommendations

769,334 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Ranking

45th

out of 111 in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Views

904

Comparisons

550

Reviews

Average Words per Review

523

Rating

7.8

82nd

out of 111 in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Views

166

Comparisons

117

Reviews

Average Words per Review

Rating

N/A

Comparisons

Datadog vs. Apica

Compared 26% of the time.

Dynatrace vs. Apica

Compared 25% of the time.

AppDynamics vs. Apica

Compared 18% of the time.

Apache JMeter vs. Apica

Compared 16% of the time.

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs. Apica

Compared 15% of the time.

More Apica Competitors →

More Nastel AutoPilot Competitors →

Also Known As

Apica LoadTest, Apica Synthetic

Learn More

Apica

Nastel Technologies

Overview

Apica offers a unified perspective on the entire technology stack, encompassing logs, metrics, traces, and APIs. This operational data fabric facilitates quick identification and resolution of performance issues throughout an enterprise's infrastructure. The platform's user-friendly features, including a drag-and-drop interface for dashboards and seamless integrations with tools like Prometheus and Elasticsearch, enhance ease of use and management. Apica's active observability swiftly analyzes telemetry data in real-time, enabling prompt issue resolution, while automated root cause analysis, powered by machine learning, streamlines troubleshooting in complex distributed systems. The platform's advanced data management centralizes observability data, simplifying storage, search, and analysis, thereby unveiling valuable insights and patterns. Apica also ensures compliance and governance, providing audit trails to help enterprises meet regulatory requirements. Whether for enterprises of all sizes or those with intricate distributed systems, Apica emerges as a robust tool to elevate technology stack observability and performance.

Nastel AutoPilot is an Application Performance Monitoring solution. It's real-time monitoring and analysis reduces the frequency and duration of incidents, end-to-end from distributed to mainframe.

Sample Customers

HBO

Banamex, Barclays Capital, Bank of Bermuda, California Commerce Bank, Calyon Corporate and Investment Bank, CGEY, Checkfree Corporation, CIBC, CitiCard, Citicorp, New York, Citigroup Inc., CME Group Inc., Credit Agricole Indosuez Luxembourg, Credit Suisse, CRIF, Deutsche Bundesbank, Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein, DTCC, FannieMae, Fidelity (FMR), First Citizens Bank & Trust, Fortis Investments, GE Money Americas, GE Money Bank, HP, HP/WestLB Systems, HSBC, HSH Nordbank, IG Index, i-bp Banque, Populaire, Interpay Nederland B.V., IZB - Informatikzentrum Bayern GmbH & Co., JP Morgan, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., MGIC (Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation) NYSE, OMGEO, People's Bank (Ct), Peoples United Bank, Phoenix Informatica Bancaria S.p.A., PinkRoccade, Santander Bank, SKOFIN, Sociale Verzekeringsbank, Thomson Financial, UBS, UMB Financial Corporation

Top Industries

REVIEWERS

Financial Services Firm42%

Hospitality Company17%

Insurance Company17%

Retailer8%

VISITORS READING REVIEWS

Financial Services Firm41%

Insurance Company10%

Computer Software Company8%

Media Company5%

No Data Available

Company Size

REVIEWERS

Small Business18%

Midsize Enterprise12%

Large Enterprise71%

VISITORS READING REVIEWS

Small Business14%

Midsize Enterprise5%

Large Enterprise81%

No Data Available

Apica is ranked 45th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 4 reviews while Nastel AutoPilot is ranked 82nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Apica is rated 8.4, while Nastel AutoPilot is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Apica writes "Offers transcript download feature and easy to set up and configure tests but not very user friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nastel AutoPilot writes "You can easily scale it for high message rates, but it's primarily a flow-monitoring tool rather than an APM". Apica is most compared with Datadog, Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Apache JMeter and OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, whereas Nastel AutoPilot is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Apica vs Nastel AutoPilot comparison