We performed a comparison between Anomali ThreatStream and ThreatQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Check Point Software Technologies, Microsoft and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms."The feature I have found most valuable is credential monitoring. This feature is easy and quick."
"The reporting services are great. With reporting services, if you have customers that just visit a URL you can see the result - including why it's blocked and how and how the URL was first recognized as malicious."
"Less code in integration would be nice when building blocks."
"The solution should be simpler for the end-user in terms of reporting and navigating the product."
Earn 20 points
Anomali ThreatStream is ranked 5th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 1 review while ThreatQ is ranked 16th in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Anomali ThreatStream is rated 7.0, while ThreatQ is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Anomali ThreatStream writes "Easy and quick credential monitoring; tech support could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatQ writes "Good reporting and pretty stable but needs to be simpler to use". Anomali ThreatStream is most compared with Recorded Future, ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), Splunk Enterprise Security, Group-IB Threat Intelligence and Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus, whereas ThreatQ is most compared with ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), Recorded Future, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and CrowdStrike Falcon.
See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.