We performed a comparison between Amazon Elastic Container Service and OpenShift Container Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."What I really like about Amazon ECS is its simplicity and ease of use. Amazon also has really good security."
"The solution has good performance."
"Amazon EC2 Container Service has multiple valuable features like load balancers and autoscalers."
"The most valuable feature of Amazon EC2 Container Service is its flexibility."
"Amazon Elastic Container Service is more stable."
"I like the tool's availability and automated scalability. I need to define the port numbers, and when I have a large load of requests, I can get automated scalability."
"The solution is easy to scale and implement and provides performance monitoring and management tools."
"Good documentation and very straightforward to implement and use."
"The most valuable feature is that the solution can be deployed in the cloud which removes the expense of a server."
"The most valuable feature for me in the OpenShift Container Platform is the option to manage different containers and environments and also being able to switch among them."
"The most valuable features are the monitoring and logging functionalities."
"The product is stable, reliable, and easy to use, from a well-known company, has a large volume handling capacity, and more and more organizations are moving to OpenShift."
"Autoscaling is an excellent feature that makes it very simple to scale our applications as required."
"The architecture is the best. The solution is scalable if you are on a container-based solution."
"On OpenShift, it's easy to scale applications. We can easily scale up or scale down."
"Centralized control of container resources is most valuable."
"It's a complex tool and should be simplified."
"The solution's user experience and management are really bad."
"The documentation and usage for the users can be better because for new users it can be very hard to understand and use the solution. They can add small images and accessories."
"In the next release, they could add some customization options for high computer workloads."
"Amazon EC2 Container Service's security can be improved."
"The solution's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The solution must improve backup and compatibility around OS like Windows and Mac."
"Since it is a managed service for container orchestration, it may limit our control over certain infrastructure functions."
"OpenShift Container Platform needs to work on integrations."
"Getting the solution quickly and troubleshooting quickly are both areas where I think it needs some work."
"Container Platform could be improved if we could aggregate logs out of the box instead of having to do it through integrations with other products."
"The price needs to be improved in OpenShift Container Platform. When I choose this, the product is the first factor that we have to make a long analysis to compare the real cost for the other services. However, price is high."
"I want to see more incorporation of native automation features; then, we could write a code, deploy it directly to OpenShift, and allow it to take care of the automated process. Using this method, we could write one application and have elements copy/pasted to other applications in the development process."
"OpenShift Container Platform could improve by having better integration."
"The product's interface is a bit buggy."
"The UI could be more user-friendly to drive tasks more effectively through the interface."
More Amazon Elastic Container Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Amazon Elastic Container Service is ranked 8th in Container Management with 46 reviews while OpenShift Container Platform is ranked 1st in Container Management with 36 reviews. Amazon Elastic Container Service is rated 8.4, while OpenShift Container Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon Elastic Container Service writes "An easy to compute solution that can be used to take complete workloads to the cloud". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenShift Container Platform writes "Provides automation that speeds up our process by 30% and helps us achieve zero downtime". Amazon Elastic Container Service is most compared with Microsoft Azure Container Service, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Google Kubernetes Engine and Linode, whereas OpenShift Container Platform is most compared with Amazon EKS, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, Rancher Labs and Kubernetes. See our Amazon Elastic Container Service vs. OpenShift Container Platform report.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
