Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon Corretto vs IBM Open Liberty comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Corretto
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Java Frameworks (9th)
IBM Open Liberty
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
2.8
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Application Server (14th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Amazon Corretto and IBM Open Liberty aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Amazon Corretto is designed for Java Frameworks and holds a mindshare of 3.6%, up 2.7% compared to last year.
IBM Open Liberty, on the other hand, focuses on Application Server, holds 1.8% mindshare.
Java Frameworks Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Amazon Corretto3.6%
Spring Boot39.2%
Jakarta EE15.1%
Other42.099999999999994%
Java Frameworks
Application Server Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
IBM Open Liberty1.8%
Oracle WebLogic Server18.4%
Tomcat16.7%
Other63.1%
Application Server
 

Featured Reviews

Use Amazon Corretto?
Share your opinion
FABIO LUIS VELLOSO DA SILVA - PeerSpot reviewer
Has enabled flexible deployment of modular services with high availability and smooth dynamic updates
The best features of IBM Open Liberty are the implementation of MicroProfile and Jakarta EE, along with fault tolerance and high availability. It's easy to use and deploy new features. The profile is easy to configure and set up features. For example, using fault tolerance from MicroProfile or using servlets or JAX-RS allows for easy configuration and creation of modular applications. The configuration is modular. The main point for us in this project was high availability, high performance, and the implementation of MicroProfile and Jakarta EE. We utilized the modular architecture of IBM Open Liberty by creating different microservices using different environments. We created different configurations for different services using the configuration of IBM Open Liberty. This was very beneficial. We created different environments only by changing the configuration, depending on the functionality we needed. It was good and very flexible for us. I used the dynamic updates feature of IBM Open Liberty and different configurations in different services and servers, based on the functionality we provided for our clients. The flexibility to create different services in different environments using IBM Open Liberty was important. The high availability is guaranteed by the architecture of IBM Open Liberty, Java, and MicroProfile. The architecture guaranteed high availability, and the flexibility comes from being able to configure needed features. There's no need to load all WebSphere or functionalities in all environments. I can configure it and create a more highly available and scalable process. I implemented monitoring tools for IBM Open Liberty using Grafana and OpenTracing using the functionalities from MicroProfile and IBM Open Liberty. The monitoring tools helped with managing system performance.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Java Frameworks solutions are best for your needs.
867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
10%
Educational Organization
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
52%
Computer Software Company
9%
Government
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Apache, Eclipse Foundation and others in Java Frameworks. Updated: August 2025.
867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.