We performed a comparison between Amazon CloudFront and Comodo cWatch based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two CDN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product’s most valuable feature is the availability of the websites."
"The most valuable feature is the number of servers they can put your content in while being reliable."
"The tool is highly available and reliable. It helps to access server applications easily. Integrating Amazon CloudFront with other AWS services was very easy, I would rate it eight out of ten."
"The AWS environment was very helpful in terms of integration."
"We can personalize a lot of things inside CDN."
"The product provides reduced latency and quicker site refreshes."
"It is stable."
"If you're using AWS entirely, it's smooth sailing."
"The solution is pretty stable. I've never faced pressing issues or hanging issue."
"The FIM feature, the information in the new management system, and their support are the most valuable features. The scanned results are quite fast as compared to other platforms compared to scanning timing. It takes about a minute or two minutes. Also, the results of the Comodo scan results are in detail."
"The UI could be more user-friendly."
"The product should be more intuitive."
"Amazon CloudFront can improve by accurately determining the latency of a non-defined URL that the solution encounters."
"I have utilized certain characteristics and invested effort in reading the documentation, which proved to be challenging."
"A lot of caching features must be added to the solution."
"The solution could be more simplified for new users. It could be more user-friendly."
"They should have more Edge locations so that CloudFront can be used much more. If they can make it a little bit cheaper and better than other networks, we will be able to use it more."
"Sometimes, the server goes down automatically."
"The solution needs to build better performance, specifically in the hardware resources."
"A small problem is from the support team. Sometimes they are a bit delayed."
Earn 20 points
Amazon CloudFront is ranked 4th in CDN with 21 reviews while Comodo cWatch is ranked 19th in CDN. Amazon CloudFront is rated 8.0, while Comodo cWatch is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Amazon CloudFront writes "Top-notch in terms of customer service and offers pay-as-you-go model with a free tier". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Comodo cWatch writes "Excellent security, good encryption, and pretty stable". Amazon CloudFront is most compared with Azure Front Door, Akamai, Cloudflare, Windows Azure CDN and Fastly, whereas Comodo cWatch is most compared with Cloudflare, Atomic ModSecurity Rules, Sucuri, AWS WAF and SiteLock. See our Amazon CloudFront vs. Comodo cWatch report.
See our list of best CDN vendors.
We monitor all CDN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
