Amazon AWS CloudSearch vs Elastic Search comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
2,018 views|1,707 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Elastic Logo
3,993 views|1,325 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon AWS CloudSearch and Elastic Search based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Search as a Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Amazon AWS CloudSearch vs. Elastic Search Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Document indexing, text-based search API, and Geospatial searches are all good features.""The quality of the solution is good.""CDN service reduces latency when accessing our web application.""AWS CloudSearch's best features are good performance under high CPU and memory use, and ease of deployment and scaling.""It will remain alive in the market. The solution will be stable in the market.""It's the best solution for any company. It has a hosting ERP system for any task. AWS is stable. AWS is more flexible and its elastic concept is a new concept. AWS is also very secure. It has many layers of security, like hardware security and software security. This is a big issue.""The most valuable feature of Amazon AWS CloudSearch is the cloud aspect. I do not need to have the physical infrastructure, everything is in the cloud.""The best feature is its scalability in that Cloud is always on the fly."

More Amazon AWS CloudSearch Pros →

"The ability to aggregate log and machine data into a searchable index reduces time to identify and isolate issues for an application. Saves time in triage and incident response by eliminating manual steps to access and parse logs on separate systems, within large infrastructure footprints.""The tool's stability and performance are good.""I like how it allows us to connect to Kafka and get this data in a document format very easily. Elasticsearch is very fast when you do text-based searches of documents. That area is very good, and the search is very good.""The most valuable feature for us is the analytics that we can configure and view using Kibana.""There's lots of processing power. You can actually just add machines to get more performance if you need to. It's pretty flexible and very easy to add another log. It's not like 'oh, no, it's going to be so much extra data'. That's not a problem for the machine. It can handle it.""A good use case is saving metadata of your systems for data cataloging. Various systems, like those opened in metadata and similar applications, use Elasticsearch to store their text data.""The forced merge and forced resonate features reduce the data size increasing reliability.""The products comes with REST APIs."

More Elastic Search Pros →

Cons
"Latlon data type only supports single value per document. All other types support multiple values. We faced issues with this because we had scenarios where, for each document, we needed to store multiple latlon values for different geographical locations.""The solution should improve the recovery aspects that it has on offer.""A reboot should be enhanced.""We'd like to see more database features.""Amazon AWS CloudSearch is highly stable. However, the speed depends on your internet connection.""I would say that it needs to keep its cost competitive in the market, especially in comparison to other clouds.""I do not have any suggestions for improvements at this time.""AWS CloudSearch's documentation isn't very clear. Also, the on-premise version of the solution is less stable than the cloud version."

More Amazon AWS CloudSearch Cons →

"Elastic Enterprise Search could improve the report templates.""Elastic Enterprise Search could improve its SSL integration easier. We should not need to go to the back-end servers to do configuration, we should be able to do it on the GUI.""We have an issue with the volume of data that we can handle.""Machine learning on search needs improvement.""There are a lot of manual steps on the operating system. It could be simplified in the user interface.""Technical support should be faster.""The pricing of this product needs to be more clear because I cannot understand it when I review the website.""Performance improvement could come from skipping background refresh on search idle shards (which is already being addressed in the upcoming seventh version)."

More Elastic Search Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We chose AWS because of its cost and stability."
  • "There was no license needed to use this solution."
  • "Amazon AWS CloudSearch charging is based on how many resources you consume or and the solution is known to be a bit expensive."
  • "Our license costs around $4,000 per month."
  • "I'm not sure how much we pay a year. It might be around $30,000 a year."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one point is cheap, and ten points are expensive, I rate the pricing as medium or reasonable."
  • "In comparison to IBM and Microsoft, the pricing is more favorable."
  • More Amazon AWS CloudSearch Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "ELK has been considered as an alternative to Splunk to reduce licensing costs."
  • "An X-Pack license is more affordable than Splunk."
  • "​The pricing and license model are clear: node-based model."
  • "This is a free, open source software (FOSS) tool, which means no cost on the front-end. There are no free lunches in this world though. Technical skill to implement and support are costly on the back-end with ELK, whether you train/hire internally or go for premium services from Elastic."
  • "We are using the free version and intend to upgrade."
  • "It can be expensive."
  • "This product is open-source and can be used free of charge."
  • "We are using the open-sourced version."
  • More Elastic Search Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Search as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It is remarkably efficient and beneficial.
    Top Answer:In comparison to IBM and Microsoft, the pricing is more favorable. I would rate it eight out of ten.
    Top Answer:A reboot should be enhanced. There are issues with the VBC collection.
    Top Answer:Logsign provides us with the capability to execute multiple queries according to our requirements. The indexing is very high, making it effective for storing and retrieving logs. The real-time… more »
    Top Answer:I don't see improvements at the moment. The current setup is working well for me, and I'm satisfied with it. Integrating with different platforms is also fine, and I'm not recommending any changes or… more »
    Ranking
    5th
    out of 13 in Search as a Service
    Views
    2,018
    Comparisons
    1,707
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    367
    Rating
    8.2
    1st
    out of 13 in Search as a Service
    Views
    3,993
    Comparisons
    1,325
    Reviews
    27
    Average Words per Review
    501
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Elastic Enterprise Search, Swiftype, Elastic Cloud
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon CloudSearch is a managed service in the AWS Cloud that makes it simple and cost-effective to set up, manage, and scale a search solution for your website or application.
    Amazon CloudSearch supports 34 languages and popular search features such as highlighting, autocomplete, and geospatial search. With Amazon CloudSearch, you can quickly add rich search capabilities to your website or application. You don't need to become a search expert or worry about hardware provisioning, setup, and maintenance. With a few clicks in the AWS Management Console, you can create a search domain and upload the data that you want to make searchable, and Amazon CloudSearch will automatically provision the required resources and deploy a highly tuned search index.

    You can easily change your search parameters, fine tune search relevance, and apply new settings at any time. As your volume of data and traffic fluctuates, Amazon CloudSearch seamlessly scales to meet your needs.

    Elasticsearch is a prominent open-source search and analytics engine known for its scalability, reliability, and straightforward management. It's a favored choice among enterprises for real-time data search, analysis, and visualization. Open-source Elasticsearch is free, offering a comprehensive feature set and scalability. It allows full control over deployments but requires managing and maintaining the infrastructure. On the other hand, Elastic Cloud provides a managed service with features like automated provisioning, high availability, security, and global reach.

    Elasticsearch excels in handling time-sensitive data and complex search requirements across large datasets. Its scalability allows it to handle growing data volumes efficiently, maintaining high performance and fast response times. Integrated with Kibana, Elasticsearch enables powerful data visualization, providing real-time insights crucial for data-driven decision-making.

    Elastic Cloud reduces operational overhead and improves scalability and performance, though it comes with associated costs. It is available on your preferred cloud provider — AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud. Customers who want to manage the software themselves, whether on public, private, or hybrid cloud, can download the Elastic Stack.

    At its core, Elasticsearch is renowned for its full-text search capabilities, capable of performing complex queries and supporting features like fuzzy matching and auto-complete.

    Peer reviews from various professionals highlight its strengths and weaknesses. Pros include its detection and correlation features, flexibility, cloud-readiness, extensibility, and efficient search capabilities. However, users have noted challenges like steep learning curves, data analysis limitations, and integration complexities. The platform is generally viewed as stable and scalable, with varying degrees of satisfaction regarding its usability and feature set.

    In summary, Elasticsearch stands out for its high-speed search, scalability, and versatile analytics, making it a go-to solution for organizations managing large datasets. Its adaptability to different enterprise needs, robust community support, and continuous development keep it at the forefront of enterprise search and analytics solutions. However, potential users should be aware of its learning curve and the need for skilled personnel for optimization.

    Sample Customers
    SmugMug
    T-Mobile, Adobe, Booking.com, BMW, Telegraph Media Group, Cisco, Karbon, Deezer, NORBr, Labelbox, Fingerprint, Relativity, NHS Hospital, Met Office, Proximus, Go1, Mentat, Bluestone Analytics, Humanz, Hutch, Auchan, Sitecore, Linklaters, Socren, Infotrack, Pfizer, Engadget, Airbus, Grab, Vimeo, Ticketmaster, Asana, Twilio, Blizzard, Comcast, RWE and many others.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    Insurance Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Computer Software Company27%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Insurance Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Government7%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon AWS CloudSearch vs. Elastic Search
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon AWS CloudSearch vs. Elastic Search and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon AWS CloudSearch is ranked 5th in Search as a Service with 12 reviews while Elastic Search is ranked 1st in Search as a Service with 59 reviews. Amazon AWS CloudSearch is rated 8.4, while Elastic Search is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon AWS CloudSearch writes "A reasonably priced solution that provides scalability, stability, reliability, and security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Elastic Search writes "Played a crucial role in enhancing our cybersecurity efforts ". Amazon AWS CloudSearch is most compared with Solr, Amazon Kendra, Algolia, Amazon Athena and Azure Search, whereas Elastic Search is most compared with Faiss, Milvus, Azure Search, Pinecone and Sinequa. See our Amazon AWS CloudSearch vs. Elastic Search report.

    See our list of best Search as a Service vendors.

    We monitor all Search as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.