No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Amazon AWS CloudSearch vs Amazon Athena comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Athena
Ranking in Search as a Service
6th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Amazon AWS CloudSearch
Ranking in Search as a Service
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Search as a Service category, the mindshare of Amazon Athena is 5.3%, down from 5.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Amazon AWS CloudSearch is 5.8%, down from 7.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Search as a Service Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Amazon Athena5.3%
Amazon AWS CloudSearch5.8%
Other88.9%
Search as a Service
 

Featured Reviews

YM
Senior Software Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Serverless analytics has reduced daily data query costs and supports accurate financial reporting
The best features Amazon Athena offers are its straightforward framework to perform ad hoc analysis on the data that we have. We use it primarily as our main query engine, so we are not using anything such as Snowflake or similar solutions. We essentially ingest the data into S3 buckets, and then we use Amazon Athena for querying the data. It is our main query platform on AWS. All of our queries, for transformations, are Athena-based queries that are orchestrated via Step Functions. We only pay for the amount of data that we scan. Since we operate on a relatively lower amount of data on a daily basis, we incur a very low cost on our querying. The pay-per-query pricing of Amazon Athena impacts my daily operations significantly. For other query engines, we pay for the query execution time, but in Amazon Athena, you only pay for the amount of data that you have scanned. Our queries primarily filter out the data. Since we operate on a daily basis, we are only concerned with today's data. When querying the data, we automatically put the filter to have the data in today's timestamp only. This way, we incur very low costs compared to other query engines. Our query scans are about 10 to 20 MBs, and despite performing 100 to 150 queries per day, this keeps our costs very manageable. Amazon Athena has positively impacted my organization by providing a completely serverless infrastructure. We have Step Functions, Lambda, and S3 buckets where we store our data. Our main infrastructure is serverless. We wanted a query engine that is less demanding in terms of setup efforts and cost-efficient, so we decided to go with Amazon Athena. It fulfills all our use cases, plus the ACID compliance that it brings, because we use Iceberg on top of Amazon Athena. This ensures our queries and data are consistent, durable, and that the queries are isolated in terms of execution. Athena's ACID compliance, especially with Iceberg, impacts our data consistency and reliability. We apply Iceberg with Parquet, which helps us compress the data to a very good volume. With the applied compression algorithms, we preserve our data consistency during parallel transformations. ACID compliance helps us achieve this, ensuring we do not compromise on our data and that our GDPR for the data is preserved.
HM
Software Developer at ECFY Consulting Private Limited
Search workflows have become faster and our team manages operational records more efficiently
Improvements for Amazon AWS CloudSearch can be made, but I will first start with the biggest improvement. The biggest improvement area is that Amazon AWS CloudSearch feels a little older compared to newer AWS services. The second thing about improvement is the documentation. The documentation could definitely be refreshed with more practical examples and troubleshooting scenarios. During setup, a few indexing issues took longer to diagnose because error messages were pretty generic. Better debugging visibility would reduce trial-and-error work. Monitoring is decent through Amazon CloudWatch, but I would like more detailed search-level diagnostics out of the box. Sometimes it is not obvious why certain queries rank results differently unless you manually test a lot. More transparent query analysis, indexing, and insights would be useful. Logging exists, but deeper visibility would help during optimization.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Amazon Athena is very stable. I never had any issues with it. The dashboarding tool is okay."
"Amazon Athena's ability to query structured and unstructured data has been beneficial."
"Athena has a really good UI and is very compatible with on-prem products."
"Athena is serverless, so we don’t have to provision or manage compute clusters, and we can simply point Athena at our data in S3 and run SQL queries immediately."
"The solution is very easy to use and integrations are very smooth."
"One of the most valuable features is the ability to partition your databases. I also like the federal query functionality, for cases when you have to query outside your S3 storage, or even completely outside of the AWS platform."
"It's easy to set up the product."
"Amazon Athena has positively impacted my organization by providing a completely serverless infrastructure."
"Document indexing, text-based search API, and Geospatial searches are all good features."
"The quality of the solution is good."
"Storage of photos and files which can be accessed anyplace, anytime, extremely quickly."
"There are plenty of services from the database, with many valuable features, good scalability and agility, okay pricing, good solution quality, strong optimization, and customization that can work with any other cloud platforms."
"It will remain alive in the market. The solution will be stable in the market."
"The best feature is its scalability in that Cloud is always on the fly."
"CDN service reduces latency when accessing our web application."
"Amazon AWS CloudSearch is practical and dependable for teams that want managed search without a lot of infrastructure management."
 

Cons

"While implementing Amazon Athena, I observed an issue where, even after writing an exclusion pattern on the AWS Glue side, whenever the end user queries, it skips the exclusion pattern, overriding it and directly fetching data from the S3 bucket."
"The solution should include a better API for query services."
"You have to build out the metadata yourself because of the nature of the cloud."
"If you compare it with Palantir, if you have some data and you want to quickly have a look at it, then that feature is not available in Amazon Cloud."
"Amazon Athena can be improved, especially when working with S3 tables, which is a caveat for us."
"Transaction support is one of the biggest missing features."
"I think it would be better if the product were more mature. It's still a young product compared to Power BI or Qlik. I find that development is a bit difficult, but it might be because I'm used to other tools. The dashboarding capabilities could be better. The reporting and statement generation could be better. I couldn't technically initiate picture-perfect reporting, for example, to send out statements every month for banking customers."
"In terms of its integration capabilities, I would say it's not straightforward. It works, but it's a little bit tricky."
"Maybe they are common in Egypt, but you should make a request on Amazon to create a function to monitor CPU performance, memory, and files. It is very difficult in AWS. I would tell them it should be simple, just drag and drop. I think they could develop this option so we can drag and drop to monitor performance of the processor and memory."
"The biggest improvement area is that Amazon AWS CloudSearch feels a little older compared to newer AWS services."
"We'd like to see more database features."
"A reboot should be enhanced."
"Amazon's technical support needs to improve as they only solve about half our problems."
"Latlon data type only supports single value per document. All other types support multiple values. We faced issues with this because we had scenarios where, for each document, we needed to store multiple latlon values for different geographical locations."
"I do not have any suggestions for improvements at this time."
"In terms of what needs improvement, I would say that it needs to keep its cost competitive in the market, especially in comparison to other clouds."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution operates on a serverless model so you only pay for data that you consume."
"I am happy with what they are charging and how they charge it, especially because they charge you per query, and not per series."
"It doesn't cost much if you are already part of the AWS ecosystem."
"Athena is very inexpensive for being a cloud tool."
"Amazon AWS CloudSearch charging is based on how many resources you consume or and the solution is known to be a bit expensive."
"I'm not sure how much we pay a year. It might be around $30,000 a year."
"There was no license needed to use this solution."
"Our license costs around $4,000 per month."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one point is cheap, and ten points are expensive, I rate the pricing as medium or reasonable."
"We chose AWS because of its cost and stability."
"In comparison to IBM and Microsoft, the pricing is more favorable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Search as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
914,262 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Healthcare Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Construction Company
11%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Educational Organization
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Amazon Athena?
Amazon Athena can be improved, especially when working with S3 tables, which is a caveat for us. It does not work very well with Amazon Athena, as we have to do multiple settings in terms of provid...
What is your primary use case for Amazon Athena?
My main use case for Amazon Athena is querying data that sits in S3 buckets. Currently, I am working for an aviation client for which we receive data on a daily basis. We take this data from a sour...
What advice do you have for others considering Amazon Athena?
Regarding Amazon Athena's AI capabilities, we do not utilize them. However, data governance is ensured, and security is adequate since we operate within the VPC. ACID compliance helps preserve GDPR...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon AWS CloudSearch?
We purchased Amazon AWS CloudSearch through the AWS Marketplace. Pricing was understandable once we estimated indexing volume and query traffic. Though it can grow if you scale instances aggressive...
What needs improvement with Amazon AWS CloudSearch?
Improvements for Amazon AWS CloudSearch can be made, but I will first start with the biggest improvement. The biggest improvement area is that Amazon AWS CloudSearch feels a little older compared t...
What is your primary use case for Amazon AWS CloudSearch?
The main use case for us was to search the operational records from our company databases and perform full-text search across operational records and uploaded documents. We needed something where u...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

bp, Cerner, Expedia, Finra, HESS, intuit, Kellog's, Philips, TIME, workday
SmugMug
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon AWS CloudSearch vs. Amazon Athena and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
914,262 professionals have used our research since 2012.