

Zapier and Alteryx Designer compete in the automation and data processing space. Zapier often has the upper hand with pricing and customer support, while Alteryx Designer excels in features and scalability for complex tasks despite a higher cost.
Features: Zapier is user-friendly and offers a broad array of integrations, which is beneficial for non-technical users. It allows data interaction among various apps without coding. Alteryx Designer specializes in handling complex machine learning models and data processing. Its drag-and-drop functionality and comprehensive analytics are highly praised, making data manipulation and analysis more sophisticated.
Room for Improvement: Zapier has limitations with its API and could improve in complex workflow creation, custom integrations, and error reporting. Alteryx Designer is criticized for its high cost and limited real-time data capabilities. Enhancements in collaboration features and greater flexibility in integration are also suggested, especially for license management and solution deployment.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zapier's cloud-based nature makes deployment straightforward, though its customer service receives mixed reviews. Alteryx Designer offers varied deployment options, including hybrid cloud, which accommodates different requirements but needs more setup. Its customer support is often commended for responsiveness and efficiency.
Pricing and ROI: Zapier provides flexible pricing with a free plan and scalable paid plans, though prices can escalate quickly with usage. Alteryx Designer is more expensive, especially for scaling operations. Both tools offer significant ROI, with Zapier noted for cost savings and Alteryx Designer for its data analytics and processing efficiency.
In a scenario where employing three resources for three months might cost approximately $18,000 to $20,000, Zapier provides substantial cost savings.
There are areas where they need to improve response time and overall competence.
Their technical support is good; they respond promptly and are very helpful.
This can help if you need assistance, as you can communicate with the community and support system, and most issues are already resolved by AI.
In my experience, the customer service and technical support of Zapier is very slow.
Make.com and nEn nEight n excel in handling complex automation tasks.
Scaling it gets quite expensive, and while I cannot evaluate it purely from a technology perspective, compared to Workato, I would give Zapier a seven for scalability.
In my current company, we had significant challenges with Zapier regarding maintenance, as Zaps were often broken, not necessarily due to Zapier, but due to changes in the input variables.
The error message options in the dashboard should be improved. It should be user-friendly so that beginners or non-technical users can figure out the problems and solutions on their own.
While Zapier already has more than 2,000 webhooks, users or developers should have the flexibility to create additional custom connectors.
You can build similar or dependent automations in one Zap, which helps with understanding the process without switching between different records.
It's cheaper than Palantir, but even Alteryx is too much for small clients.
The pricing is in accordance with market standards and even lower in some cases.
The pricing of Zapier is slightly higher compared to other market automation tools such as Pabbly, Make.com, and N8N, which have good features but are priced lower than Zapier.
The main valuable aspect is the simplicity of use across all features.
The most valuable aspect is the ability to integrate with over 20,000 applications, which is a superior feature compared to Make.com that has limited applications access.
The main thing I appreciate about Zapier is that it has maximum availability of apps, with most tools being available compared to different solutions.
I actually used most of the automation features. When a user submits a form, I get the details or leads of that form and put them on other third-party tools, such as Notion, Google Sheets, Airtable, or send a lead to Slack.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Alteryx Designer | 1.4% |
| Zapier | 0.8% |
| Other | 97.8% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 17 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 30 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
Zapier connects thousands of apps, enabling seamless automation without coding. It supports webhooks, multi-step tasks, and a wide array of integrations. Despite needing enhancements in Google Sheets capabilities, API limits, and UI, it remains a tool for boosting productivity across many sectors.
By linking tools such as Google Sheets, HubSpot, Slack, and Salesforce, Zapier allows users to automate workflows without coding expertise. Its integrations serve logistics operations, CRM, and social media management. Users can process tracking exceptions and streamline operations with third-party software like QuickBooks, Zoho, and Power BI. Although users suggest features like better Google Sheets handling and improved collaboration tools, Zapier continues to provide expansive automation, enhancing efficiency and facilitating new opportunities through integrations.
What Features Stand Out in Zapier?In logistics, Zapier enhances operations by automating exception tracking and third-party software integration. Its use in CRM and social media streamlines lead creation and workflow automation. Users from diverse industries leverage its extensive connectivity to support intelligence management, generate analytical insights, and execute cross-functional tasks efficiently.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.