We performed a comparison between Alteryx Designer and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Alteryx Designer is its ability to select all the inputs and formulas."
"One of the things I like about Alteryx Designer is how easy it is to connect numerous data inputs, including API connectors. This helps tremendously in reducing the time required to extract data from systems like SAP that don't have straightforward connectivity options."
"The product is very stable. The performance is reliable."
"It has great UI."
"When you open a raw Excel file, it can be hard to look at everything in detail. Alteryx makes it much easier to go through the data, summarize it, and use different tools for analysis."
"Workflow automation, in general, is valuable."
"I believe in the ability to connect to multiple data sources, as well as the ease of use to transform data and output data in a variety of formats."
"I have been using Alteryx Designer only for data modeling and data structuring."
"The most valuable features are workflow and process automation."
"It is stable and scalable."
"It is very simple and easy to learn compared to any other RPA tools such as UiPath, Automation Anywhere and Blue Prism."
"The drag and drop functionality is quite good."
"Provides valuable tools working in integration with RPA tools."
"Kofax RPA's best feature is its high success percentage in picking up information from documents, especially where the DPI is really low."
"The best part of Kofax is that they have a whole concept. It's one product, but also has extra elements that can be integrated."
"The product provided all the security controls that we asked them."
"It would be simpler if they provided a component where you could simply enter some parameters and see the results."
"When configuring the Logix, the UA could be improved."
"Alteryx Designer's cost should be improved."
"Alteryx Designer's pricing and support could be improved."
"Improving the key-based sign-on process and making it more user-friendly would be a benefit."
"The price of the product is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"The conditional join feature should be improved."
"When it comes to the pivoting part, the drill-through option is not there in Alteryx."
"The solution needs to be scalable."
"It needs a free training portal for anybody on the internet to use so that they can get an idea of what the possibilities are."
"The solution could use some AI integrated features."
"The scalability has room for improvement."
"The process discovery could be a bit better."
"RPA technology is constantly changing, and sometimes Kofax lags behind."
"The technical support must be improved."
"Automation with the latest websites is not effective. The support of newer websites developed using new technologies would improve this solution."
Alteryx Designer is ranked 9th in Data Integration with 27 reviews while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. Alteryx Designer is rated 8.0, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Alteryx Designer writes "An easy-to-use automation solution with satisfying customer support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". Alteryx Designer is most compared with Azure Data Factory, FME, Informatica PowerCenter, SSIS and Palantir Foundry, whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and SAS Data Management. See our Alteryx Designer vs. Tungsten RPA report.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
