AlphaTrust PRONTO Server ERSS vs Conga Sign comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AlphaTrust PRONTO Server ERSS and Conga Sign based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Docusign, Adobe, Dropbox and others in eSignature (Electronic Signature).
To learn more, read our detailed eSignature (Electronic Signature) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
34
Comparisons
22
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
402
Comparisons
329
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
eSignature (Electronic Signature)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Docusign, Adobe, Dropbox and others in eSignature (Electronic Signature). Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
PRONTO Server ERSS
Learn More
Conga
Video Not Available
Overview
AlphaTrust's PRONTO Enterprise Platform is a proven server-based software solution for managing the entire process of getting documents competed, signed, approved, routed, and stored. PRONTO Enterprise Platform can meet user's document completion, execution, verification, and archiving needs for business documents requiring signature or approval (forms, contracts, documents). The PRONTO Enterprise Platform software runs entirely on a Web server and there is no requirement for end users to install any software or download any Web browser components. Presentation and signing of documents is done using a Web Browser and, optionally, e-mail. Documents are properly signed according to law and regulations and secured using the cryptographic technology. The user's experience is simple point-and-click. Printing, signing, and shipping of signed documents are eliminated along with the significant delays caused by manual, physical routing. PRONTO Enterprise Platform is used to manage online document signing / approval processes. Production applications include: online contracting, human resource documentation, health care documentation, and financial service applications.

Conga Sign is an e-signature software that is designed to simplify the process of signing and managing documents electronically. Based on user reviews, Conga Sign is a reliable and easy-to-use e-signature software that helps them to streamline their document management processes. Users have reported that Conga Sign's integration with popular applications like Salesforce, Microsoft Word, and Google Drive has been well-received. Users have experienced reduced errors and improved efficiency in document processing with Conga Sign.

Sample Customers
Kroll, Lexis Nexis, Oracle, Paychex, PennWell, Reed Elsevier
Oodle Car Finance, InZone Industries, Allianz Care, Brightpearl
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company18%
Healthcare Company10%
Construction Company9%
Outsourcing Company9%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business42%
Midsize Enterprise6%
Large Enterprise52%
Buyer's Guide
eSignature (Electronic Signature)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Docusign, Adobe, Dropbox and others in eSignature (Electronic Signature). Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AlphaTrust PRONTO Server ERSS is ranked 29th in eSignature (Electronic Signature) while Conga Sign is ranked 9th in eSignature (Electronic Signature). AlphaTrust PRONTO Server ERSS is rated 0.0, while Conga Sign is rated 0.0. On the other hand, AlphaTrust PRONTO Server ERSS is most compared with , whereas Conga Sign is most compared with DocuSign.

See our list of best eSignature (Electronic Signature) vendors.

We monitor all eSignature (Electronic Signature) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.