Alluvio AppResponse vs Kaseya Traverse comparison

Riverbed and Kaseya are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Riverbed is ranked #54 with an average rating of 8.0, while Kaseya is ranked #58 with an average rating of 8.0. Riverbed holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to Kaseya’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Riverbed users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Kaseya users who would recommend it.

Alluvio AppResponse

Read 17 Alluvio AppResponse reviews

1,735 Views
1,076 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Kaseya Traverse

Read 8 Kaseya Traverse reviews

961 Views
788 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Alluvio AppResponse

Kaseya Traverse

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Alluvio AppResponse and Kaseya Traverse compete in the network performance monitoring space. Alluvio AppResponse has the upper hand due to cost-effectiveness and ease of use, whereas Kaseya Traverse is favored for its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Alluvio AppResponse provides high-level visibility with advanced data analytics, network diagnostics, and optimized network management. Kaseya Traverse offers predictive analytics, comprehensive monitoring across diverse network environments, and a more holistic solution.

Room for Improvement: Alluvio AppResponse could improve by expanding its feature set, enhancing integration capabilities, and fine-tuning predictive analytics. Kaseya Traverse could benefit from simplifying deployment, reducing initial investment, and improving user interface intuitiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Alluvio AppResponse is recognized for straightforward deployment and responsive customer support. Kaseya Traverse offers more complex deployment procedures, which are mitigated by detailed documentation and an excellent support system.

Pricing and ROI: Alluvio AppResponse is cited for cost-effective setup and strong ROI through optimized network management, ideal for budget-conscious users. Kaseya Traverse requires a higher initial investment, but offers favorable ROI due to advanced feature sets and operational efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed Alluvio AppResponse vs. Kaseya Traverse Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Alluvio AppResponse vs. Kaseya Traverse

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Alluvio AppResponse

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

54th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (46th)

Kaseya Traverse

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

58th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (35th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Alluvio AppResponse is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaseya Traverse is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Alluvio AppResponse	0.7%
Kaseya Traverse	0.5%
Other	98.8%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Satyam Kumar

Senior Technical Engineer at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

Identifies and analyzes performance issues quickly using in-built AI and ML

With Alluvio AppResponse, there is an in-built analytical analysis with AI and ML, which identifies and provides data such as the number of TCP retransmits, web access time, total connection time out, total connections established, and server-side errors. The RTCC response time composition chart is crucial because it helps pinpoint the issue's origin, whether from the server, network, or application side. It's a superb product when compared to SolarWinds SAM, which is agent-based, while Alluvio AppResponse captures all traffic from the core switch.

Read full review

AMMAR HUMAIDY HUSIN

Technical Consultant at a university with 11-50 employees

Automation increases efficiency, but pricing needs to be more competitive

Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpful for me as a customer. The issue always is the price, as we cannot beat most of our competitors on pricing alone. If a product is just nice to have, not essential like an antivirus, if it's not really competitive with pricing, we cannot sell it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is performance monitoring."

"We really like the scalability capabilities."

"The most valuable feature of Alluvio AppResponse is the actual response time for measuring performance."

"With some APM solutions, it can take a long time to check a periodic report, but you can get all the necessary details quickly with AppResponse."

"I have found the AppResponse, which is a packet capture solution, very good. It gives you the ability to drill down back in time. You've got all the packets there. You can troubleshoot it later, not immediately. It's very interesting."

"Ability to see end to end user, application, server, and network response time and throughput data."

"It provides us with complete visibility of every packet."

"AppResponse is a total solution that gives you end-to-end visibility into applications at all levels, from Layer 1 to Layer 7. We can trace all those sections: physical, IP, transport, presentation, application, etc. It gives us the full picture."

More Alluvio AppResponse pros

"Automating processes is crucial for me, so the automation part stands out."

"It's a simple and humble tool."

"The remote support and data collection features are great."

"Everything is running seamlessly on the solution, to the point where you don't see any gap."

"We have found the solution to be very flexible to our requirements. We have been able to configure it on-premise effectively when we were using less of the cloud."

"Most of the features are pretty good and the solution is user friendly."

"Kaseya Traverse is a very stable solution and very sustainable in terms of what the market wants, what is out there, price-wise and functionality features. They're quite competitive and they are always innovating."

"It is a pretty stable solution...It is a pretty stable solution."

More Kaseya Traverse pros

Cons

"If Alluvio AppResponse reduces its cost, it will be more beneficial for customers to monitor their application and network performance."

"The recent changes in corporate structure may have caused some decrease in support quality."

"Integration between NPM and APM solutions would improve efficiency. There is no agent on the server site related to AppResponse."

"They need to better integrate with products and solutions from different vendors."

"Alluvio AppResponse should improve its ability to expand across multiple operating systems."

"The initial setup is straightforward, but you have to know a little about the product. It's not for everybody to just plug and play. If you know how the solution is implemented then it is straightforward."

"The AI features should be addressed in respect of the analysis and intelligence that must be supported and delivered in the tool to predigest the large amounts of data."

"The recent changes in corporate structure may have caused some decrease in support quality."

More Alluvio AppResponse cons

"We've noticed a few bugs as of late. However, this seems to only be in the reporting part of the product."

"Reporting is a bit difficult."

"Dashboards and Central Protection were an issue. Also, database monitoring was not there. Even though they said that it was there at an additional cost, that tool was very basic. We couldn't have device configuration backup also."

"The tool needs to have some AI capabilities, which it lacks currently."

"In terms of what could be improved, we are innovating all the time, as well as having a look at different avenues so that the strategy follows the structure. I think the software is still a little bit too new to actually fully asses what it has."

"Kaseya Traverse can improve by adding a Service Map to help us create a configuration management database (CMDB), this would be helpful for us."

"Reporting is tedious and not organized in the way customers expect."

"However, the issue lies in the adequacy of the responses to my questions, which are usually not up to par."

More Kaseya Traverse cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."

"The price is a little bit high, especially because we have to pay an import tax."

"It is costly for small and medium businesses."

"The solution is no more expensive than other products."

"The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive."

"The price depends on whether you are monitoring different applications, especially in bulk, and depends on what you're doing. If you're monitoring one endpoint, it will cost you 150 ZAR."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Performing Arts

15%

Manufacturing Company

Media Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?

The pricing of Riverbed Alluvio AppResponse is really high. Very few customers buy Riverbed because many do not have the sufficient budget. Its pricing is comparatively higher than SolarWinds. Rive...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?

The reporting models need improvement as most of the time, we have to customize the reports manually. Additionally, a feature similar to SolarWinds AppStack, which provides a holistic view of the i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?

We are the partner of Riverbed. Once any customer buys the Riverbed product, we deploy and configure it to meet their use cases. Alluvio AppResponse can identify if a page or an application is slow...

See all answers

What do you like most about Kaseya Traverse?

The remote support and data collection features are great.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaseya Traverse?

The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive. We pay an annual license fee. There are no additional fees associated with the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaseya Traverse?

See all answers

Comparisons

vRealize Network Insight vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 10% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 6% of the time

Elastic Observability vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios XI vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 6% of the time

More Alluvio AppResponse Competitors

PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 18% of the time

Pico Corvil Analytics vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 16% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 14% of the time

DX Performance Management vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 12% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 12% of the time

More Kaseya Traverse Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

January 2026

Download Alluvio AppResponse product report

Buyer's Guide

Kaseya Traverse

January 2026

Download Kaseya Traverse product report

Also Known As

Riverbed AppResponse, OPNET SteelCentral AppResponse, ACE Live, OPNET, AppResponse Xpert

No data available

Overview

Alluvio AppResponse provides fast packet capture and storage that feeds intelligent network and application analysis with fast troubleshooting workflows to speed problem diagnosis and resolution. AppResponse delivers full stack application analysis—from packets to web pages - enabling you observe all network and application interactions as they cross the wire, whether they are encrypted or not. Using powerful, flexible network and application analytics and workflows, AppResponse speeds problem diagnosis and resolution, helping you get to answers fast

Riverbed

Immediately identify impacted IT services using insights based on rich data analytics of events such as SNMP traps, Windows events and Syslogs. Resolve faults quickly via NetFlow enabled root cause analysis across cloud, on-premise, hybrid cloud and virtualized IT environments.

Kaseya

Sample Customers

N11.com, OneMain Financial, China Bank, Halkbank, Kaust

UltiSat, Clear Concepts, nVidia, United States Postal Service, Cisco, Redbox, Spark Digital, People's Bank & Trust

Buyer's Guide

Alluvio AppResponse vs. Kaseya Traverse

December 2025

Free Report: Alluvio AppResponse vs. Kaseya Traverse

Find out what your peers are saying about Alluvio AppResponse vs. Kaseya Traverse and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Alluvio AppResponse vs. Kaseya Traverse report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.