Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Alluvio AppResponse vs Kaseya Traverse comparison

Riverbed and Kaseya are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Riverbed is ranked #61 with an average rating of 8.0, while Kaseya is ranked #56 with an average rating of 8.0. Riverbed holds a 0.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to Kaseya’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Riverbed users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Kaseya users who would recommend it.
Alluvio AppResponse
Read 17 Alluvio AppResponse reviews
  • 1,077 Views
  • 689 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
Kaseya Traverse
Read 8 Kaseya Traverse reviews
  • 619 Views
  • 520 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Alluvio AppResponse and Kaseya Traverse compete in the network performance monitoring space. Alluvio AppResponse has the upper hand due to cost-effectiveness and ease of use, whereas Kaseya Traverse is favored for its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Alluvio AppResponse provides high-level visibility with advanced data analytics, network diagnostics, and optimized network management. Kaseya Traverse offers predictive analytics, comprehensive monitoring across diverse network environments, and a more holistic solution.

Room for Improvement: Alluvio AppResponse could improve by expanding its feature set, enhancing integration capabilities, and fine-tuning predictive analytics. Kaseya Traverse could benefit from simplifying deployment, reducing initial investment, and improving user interface intuitiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Alluvio AppResponse is recognized for straightforward deployment and responsive customer support. Kaseya Traverse offers more complex deployment procedures, which are mitigated by detailed documentation and an excellent support system.

Pricing and ROI: Alluvio AppResponse is cited for cost-effective setup and strong ROI through optimized network management, ideal for budget-conscious users. Kaseya Traverse requires a higher initial investment, but offers favorable ROI due to advanced feature sets and operational efficiencies.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Alluvio AppResponse vs. Kaseya Traverse Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Alluvio AppResponse vs. Kaseya Traverse
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Alluvio AppResponse
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
61st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (48th)
Kaseya Traverse
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
56th
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Monitoring Software (32nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Alluvio AppResponse is 0.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaseya Traverse is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Ahmet Kilic - PeerSpot reviewer
It's a total solution that gives you end-to-end visibility at all levels
I rate Alluvio AppResponse 10 out of 10. If you work for a financial company especially, you probably face problems on the application side. The problem is easy to identify, but you need to determine the root cause. You can solve issues easily via AppResponse because it shows you all the details of your transactions so you can see the real problem in the database, network, software, etc. For example, you can find the solution easily if you create the right dashboard on your site. If you can't find the problem, you can observe or investigate PCAP.
Read full review
AMMAR HUMAIDY HUSIN - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation increases efficiency, but pricing needs to be more competitive
Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpful for me as a customer. The issue always is the price, as we cannot beat most of our competitors on pricing alone. If a product is just nice to have, not essential like an antivirus, if it's not really competitive with pricing, we cannot sell it.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I have found the AppResponse, which is a packet capture solution, very good. It gives you the ability to drill down back in time. You've got all the packets there. You can troubleshoot it later, not immediately. It's very interesting."
"The most valuable feature is performance monitoring."
"When it comes to the ability to scale up the product, this is suitable for small medium and large environments,"
"The most valuable feature of Alluvio AppResponse is the actual response time for measuring performance."
"We really like the scalability capabilities."
"With some APM solutions, it can take a long time to check a periodic report, but you can get all the necessary details quickly with AppResponse."
"Riverbed's product is a superb product."
"You need a packet capture device to perform any type of network monitoring. It helps ensure that network overloads don't happen with alerts allowing for proactive decisions."
More Alluvio AppResponse pros
"Everything is running seamlessly on the solution, to the point where you don't see any gap."
"We have found the solution to be very flexible to our requirements. We have been able to configure it on-premise effectively when we were using less of the cloud."
"Automating processes is crucial for me, so the automation part stands out."
"Most of the features are pretty good and the solution is user friendly."
"The remote support and data collection features are great."
"If I want to automate the management and maintenance of my server automatically, this product is a good use case for that."
"It's a simple and humble tool."
"It is a pretty stable solution...It is a pretty stable solution."
More Kaseya Traverse pros
 

Cons

"They need to better integrate with products and solutions from different vendors."
"The reporting models need improvement as most of the time, we have to customize the reports manually."
"The pricing is on the higher side of things. If they could lower it, that would be ideal."
"The recent changes in corporate structure may have caused some decrease in support quality."
"If Alluvio AppResponse reduces its cost, it will be more beneficial for customers to monitor their application and network performance."
"Integration between NPM and APM solutions would improve efficiency. There is no agent on the server site related to AppResponse."
"Need to bring back the NetFlow module for AppResponse."
"Technical support needs to be more responsive."
More Alluvio AppResponse cons
"Kaseya Traverse can improve by adding a Service Map to help us create a configuration management database (CMDB), this would be helpful for us."
"The tool needs to have some AI capabilities, which it lacks currently."
"Dashboards and Central Protection were an issue. Also, database monitoring was not there. Even though they said that it was there at an additional cost, that tool was very basic. We couldn't have device configuration backup also."
"We've noticed a few bugs as of late. However, this seems to only be in the reporting part of the product."
"In terms of what could be improved, we are innovating all the time, as well as having a look at different avenues so that the strategy follows the structure. I think the software is still a little bit too new to actually fully asses what it has."
"Reporting is a bit difficult."
"Reporting is tedious and not organized in the way customers expect."
"However, the issue lies in the adequacy of the responses to my questions, which are usually not up to par."
More Kaseya Traverse cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is no more expensive than other products."
"The price is a little bit high, especially because we have to pay an import tax."
"It is costly for small and medium businesses."
"The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."
"The price depends on whether you are monitoring different applications, especially in bulk, and depends on what you're doing. If you're monitoring one endpoint, it will cost you 150 ZAR."
"The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Performing Arts
10%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
Computer Software Company
25%
Non Profit
10%
Wholesaler/Distributor
9%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?
The most valuable feature of Alluvio AppResponse is the actual response time for measuring performance.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?
The pricing of Riverbed Alluvio AppResponse is really high. Very few customers buy Riverbed because many do not have the sufficient budget. Its pricing is comparatively higher than SolarWinds. Rive...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?
The reporting models need improvement as most of the time, we have to customize the reports manually. Additionally, a feature similar to SolarWinds AppStack, which provides a holistic view of the i...
See all answers
What do you like most about Kaseya Traverse?
The remote support and data collection features are great.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaseya Traverse?
The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive. We pay an annual license fee. There are no additional fees associated with the product.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Kaseya Traverse?
Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpfu...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

vRealize Network Insight vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
vRealize Network Insight vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 19% of the time
Nagios XI vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
Nagios XI vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 12% of the time
LogicMonitor vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
LogicMonitor vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 12% of the time
Pico Corvil Analytics vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
Pico Corvil Analytics vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 12% of the time
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 10% of the time
More Alluvio AppResponse Competitors
PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse Logo
PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse
Compared 66% of the time
Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs Kaseya Traverse Logo
Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs Kaseya Traverse
Compared 34% of the time
More Kaseya Traverse Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
August 2025
Alluvio AppResponse reportDownload Alluvio AppResponse product report
Buyer's Guide
Kaseya Traverse
August 2025
Kaseya Traverse reportDownload Kaseya Traverse product report
 

Also Known As

Riverbed AppResponse, OPNET SteelCentral AppResponse, ACE Live, OPNET, AppResponse Xpert
No data available
 

Overview

Alluvio AppResponse provides fast packet capture and storage that feeds intelligent network and application analysis with fast troubleshooting workflows to speed problem diagnosis and resolution. AppResponse delivers full stack application analysis—from packets to web pages - enabling you observe all network and application interactions as they cross the wire, whether they are encrypted or not. Using powerful, flexible network and application analytics and workflows, AppResponse speeds problem diagnosis and resolution, helping you get to answers fast

Riverbed

Immediately identify impacted IT services using insights based on rich data analytics of events such as SNMP traps, Windows events and Syslogs. Resolve faults quickly via NetFlow enabled root cause analysis across cloud, on-premise, hybrid cloud and virtualized IT environments.

Kaseya
 

Sample Customers

N11.com, OneMain Financial, China Bank, Halkbank, Kaust
UltiSat, Clear Concepts, nVidia, United States Postal Service, Cisco, Redbox, Spark Digital, People's Bank & Trust
Buyer's Guide
Alluvio AppResponse vs. Kaseya Traverse
July 2025
Free Report: Alluvio AppResponse vs. Kaseya Traverse
Find out what your peers are saying about Alluvio AppResponse vs. Kaseya Traverse and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Alluvio AppResponse vs. Kaseya Traverse report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.