Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Auto Scaling vs Alluvio AppResponse comparison

Riverbed and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Riverbed is ranked #46 with an average rating of 8.0, while Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.7. Riverbed holds a 0.5% mindshare in APM, compared to Amazon Web Services (AWS)’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Riverbed users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users who would recommend it.
Alluvio AppResponse
Read 17 Alluvio AppResponse reviews
  • 1,735 Views
  • 781 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
AWS Auto Scaling
Read 22 AWS Auto Scaling reviews
  • 802 Views
  • 754 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Alluvio AppResponse and AWS Auto Scaling cater to different aspects of IT management. AWS Auto Scaling appears to have the upper hand due to its robust and versatile features for managing cloud resources effectively.

What features are offered by Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to AWS Auto Scaling?

Alluvio AppResponse provides deep packet inspection, comprehensive analytics, and detailed network performance monitoring. AWS Auto Scaling offers automatic scaling capabilities, seamless integration with other AWS services, and dynamic resource allocation based on demand.

What areas of improvement can be found in Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to AWS Auto Scaling?

Alluvio AppResponse could benefit from more intuitive configuration options, enhanced cloud integration, and a simplified setup process. AWS Auto Scaling could improve its monitoring tools, support responsiveness, and ease of setup process further.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to AWS Auto Scaling?

Alluvio AppResponse receives mixed reviews for deployment complexity and customer support efficiency. AWS Auto Scaling is noted for straightforward deployment in cloud environments, though there is room for improvement in the support responsiveness.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to AWS Auto Scaling?

Alluvio AppResponse users find the initial setup cost high but acceptable given its detailed insights. AWS Auto Scaling offers cost-efficient scalability and a more favorable ROI due to its pay-as-you-go pricing model.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed AWS Auto Scaling vs. Alluvio AppResponse Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
AWS Auto Scaling vs. Alluvio AppResponse
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Alluvio AppResponse
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
46th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (54th)
AWS Auto Scaling
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
14th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.0
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Alluvio AppResponse is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AWS Auto Scaling is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
AWS Auto Scaling0.4%
Alluvio AppResponse0.5%
Other99.1%
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

SK
Satyam Kumar
Senior Technical Engineer at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
Identifies and analyzes performance issues quickly using in-built AI and ML
With Alluvio AppResponse, there is an in-built analytical analysis with AI and ML, which identifies and provides data such as the number of TCP retransmits, web access time, total connection time out, total connections established, and server-side errors. The RTCC response time composition chart is crucial because it helps pinpoint the issue's origin, whether from the server, network, or application side. It's a superb product when compared to SolarWinds SAM, which is agent-based, while Alluvio AppResponse captures all traffic from the core switch.
Read full review
Ishaka Michael Efe - PeerSpot reviewer
Ishaka Michael Efe
DevOps Engineer Intern at HNG Tech
Automation has simplified traffic management and improved workload efficiency
I'm not really sure what improvements I would want to see in AWS Auto Scaling because I haven't really used it extensively or explored most of it. To the extent that I've used it so far, I think it is very good. I can't really say for certain what should be improved because I haven't really explored it a lot. However, what I've been using it for has been very good. If there could be training for AWS Auto Scaling, that would be fine. If you could add more training on how to use it correctly and on the functions that I haven't used before or some people have not really used before, that would help. If there could be more documentation and training on it, that would be beneficial.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's a stable product. Riverbed has invested a significant amount of research and development into it, so it's a solid tool overall."
"The most valuable feature of Alluvio AppResponse is the actual response time for measuring performance."
"Riverbed's product is a superb product."
"Ability to see end to end user, application, server, and network response time and throughput data."
"You need a packet capture device to perform any type of network monitoring. It helps ensure that network overloads don't happen with alerts allowing for proactive decisions."
"The most valuable feature is performance monitoring."
"It provides us with complete visibility of every packet."
"I have found the AppResponse, which is a packet capture solution, very good. It gives you the ability to drill down back in time. You've got all the packets there. You can troubleshoot it later, not immediately. It's very interesting."
More Alluvio AppResponse pros
"The health check integration feature ensures that the instances are healthy and capable of absorbing traffic, thus serving their purpose effectively."
"I would highly recommend Auto Scaling to others because it is a fantastic feature that simplifies scaling processes and makes deployment efficient."
"The automation aspect where you can automate it to whatever you want is what I value the most about Auto Scaling."
"The setup is not very complex."
"The good thing about Autoscaling is that it provides the capacity to minimize downtime. So, it gives you the assurance of stability and robustness within your system."
"I like the graphs provided by the tool."
"The solution's monitoring effectively monitors our application and CPU utilization."
"The tool gives you the flexibility to scale up and grow. The solution is also fast to deploy."
More AWS Auto Scaling pros
 

Cons

"Integration between NPM and APM solutions would improve efficiency. There is no agent on the server site related to AppResponse."
"The reporting models need improvement as most of the time, we have to customize the reports manually."
"If Alluvio AppResponse reduces its cost, it will be more beneficial for customers to monitor their application and network performance."
"Need to bring back the NetFlow module for AppResponse."
"Alluvio AppResponse should improve its ability to expand across multiple operating systems."
"The initial setup is straightforward, but you have to know a little about the product. It's not for everybody to just plug and play. If you know how the solution is implemented then it is straightforward."
"They need to better integrate with products and solutions from different vendors."
"The recent changes in corporate structure may have caused some decrease in support quality."
More Alluvio AppResponse cons
"It could be cheaper."
"The solution's infrastructure scalability and elasticity could be improved."
"Flexibility in configuring the workload is missing in AWS Auto Scaling."
"The product’s security features need improvement."
"We can have more auto scaling algorithms implemented in AWS Auto Scaling."
"The tool must include AI features."
"The setup can be a bit complex in some situations."
"Setting up the configuration involves too much work for the cloud engineer."
More AWS Auto Scaling cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is no more expensive than other products."
"It is costly for small and medium businesses."
"The price is a little bit high, especially because we have to pay an import tax."
"The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."
"AWS Auto Scaling is a pay-per-use and pay-as-you-use service."
"AWS Auto Scaling is a cheap solution."
"The product is expensive."
"The product has moderate pricing."
"AWS Auto Scaling is an expensive solution."
"The pricing is good. I have not had any customers that have complained about the price."
"AWS Auto Scaling's price is high."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Performing Arts
15%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Media Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise10
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise11
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?
The pricing of Riverbed Alluvio AppResponse is really high. Very few customers buy Riverbed because many do not have the sufficient budget. Its pricing is comparatively higher than SolarWinds. Rive...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?
The reporting models need improvement as most of the time, we have to customize the reports manually. Additionally, a feature similar to SolarWinds AppStack, which provides a holistic view of the i...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?
We are the partner of Riverbed. Once any customer buys the Riverbed product, we deploy and configure it to meet their use cases. Alluvio AppResponse can identify if a page or an application is slow...
See all answers
What do you like most about AWS Auto Scaling?
The tool's most valuable feature is vertical auto-scaling, which is easy to use. However, most companies now prefer horizontal scaling. I set up the health check integration to monitor CPU usage. W...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Auto Scaling?
I'm not sure about the pricing aspect of AWS Auto Scaling or the cost of it.
See all answers
What needs improvement with AWS Auto Scaling?
I'm not really sure what improvements I would want to see in AWS Auto Scaling because I haven't really used it extensively or explored most of it. To the extent that I've used it so far, I think it...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

vRealize Network Insight vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
vRealize Network Insight vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 10% of the time
LogicMonitor vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
LogicMonitor vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 6% of the time
Elastic Observability vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
Elastic Observability vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 6% of the time
Splunk AppDynamics vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
Splunk AppDynamics vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 6% of the time
Nagios XI vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
Nagios XI vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 6% of the time
More Alluvio AppResponse Competitors
Akamai mPulse vs AWS Auto Scaling Logo
Akamai mPulse vs AWS Auto Scaling
Compared 30% of the time
VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs AWS Auto Scaling Logo
VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs AWS Auto Scaling
Compared 30% of the time
Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) vs AWS Auto Scaling Logo
Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) vs AWS Auto Scaling
Compared 22% of the time
Splunk Enterprise Security vs AWS Auto Scaling Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs AWS Auto Scaling
Compared 18% of the time
More AWS Auto Scaling Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
January 2026
Alluvio AppResponse reportDownload Alluvio AppResponse product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
January 2026
AWS Auto Scaling reportDownload AWS Auto Scaling product report
 

Also Known As

Riverbed AppResponse, OPNET SteelCentral AppResponse, ACE Live, OPNET, AppResponse Xpert
AWS Auto-Scaling
 

Overview

Alluvio AppResponse provides fast packet capture and storage that feeds intelligent network and application analysis with fast troubleshooting workflows to speed problem diagnosis and resolution. AppResponse delivers full stack application analysis—from packets to web pages - enabling you observe all network and application interactions as they cross the wire, whether they are encrypted or not. Using powerful, flexible network and application analytics and workflows, AppResponse speeds problem diagnosis and resolution, helping you get to answers fast

Riverbed

AWS Auto Scaling monitors your applications and automatically adjusts capacity to maintain steady, predictable performance at the lowest possible cost. Using AWS Auto Scaling, it’s easy to setup application scaling for multiple resources across multiple services in minutes. The service provides a simple, powerful user interface that lets you build scaling plans for resources including Amazon EC2 instances and Spot Fleets, Amazon ECS tasks, Amazon DynamoDB tables and indexes, and Amazon Aurora Replicas. AWS Auto Scaling makes scaling simple with recommendations that allow you to optimize performance, costs, or balance between them. If you’re already using Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling to dynamically scale your Amazon EC2 instances, you can now combine it with AWS Auto Scaling to scale additional resources for other AWS services. With AWS Auto Scaling, your applications always have the right resources at the right time.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
 

Sample Customers

N11.com, OneMain Financial, China Bank, Halkbank, Kaust
Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
Buyer's Guide
AWS Auto Scaling vs. Alluvio AppResponse
December 2025
Free Report: AWS Auto Scaling vs. Alluvio AppResponse
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Auto Scaling vs. Alluvio AppResponse and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our AWS Auto Scaling vs. Alluvio AppResponse report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.