Akamai App and API Protector vs Wallarm NG WAF comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Akamai and Wallarm are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. Akamai is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.0, while Wallarm is ranked #39. Akamai holds a 3.0% mindshare in WAF, compared to Wallarm’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Akamai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Wallarm users who would recommend it.

Akamai App and API Protector

Read 29 Akamai App and API Protector reviews

8,856 Views
4,871 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Wallarm NG WAF

Read 5 Wallarm NG WAF reviews

2,263 Views
1,584 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Akamai App and API Protector

Wallarm NG WAF

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Wallarm NG WAF and Akamai App and API Protector are products competing in the application and API security category. Akamai slightly leads due to its robust feature set, which edges out Wallarm's favorable pricing and support.

Features: Wallarm NG WAF offers real-time threat prevention with AI-driven threat intelligence, proficient API and microservices protection, and innovative blocking of malicious traffic. Akamai App and API Protector provides advanced application-layer security, extensive global network integration, and content delivery network support, enhancing its global application protection capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Wallarm NG WAF could improve its global network reach, complexity in handling large-scale operations, and comprehensive security range. Akamai App and API Protector might focus on simplifying deployment, extending more personalized customer service, and reducing initial financial outlays for better ROI.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Wallarm NG WAF is known for straightforward deployment and highly responsive customer service that ensures quick resolutions. Akamai App and API Protector involves more complex setup, reflecting extensive configuration options and support tailored for large enterprises.

Pricing and ROI: Wallarm NG WAF is cost-effective, suitable for businesses focusing on efficient financial outlays and quick ROI. In contrast, Akamai App and API Protector requires a higher initial investment, justified by its expansive features, offering long-term value for those needing extensive security capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai App and API Protector vs. Wallarm NG WAF Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Akamai App and API Protector vs. Wallarm NG WAF

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akamai App and API Protector

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

24th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (8th), Cloud and Data Center Security (15th)

Wallarm NG WAF

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

39th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Security (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Akamai App and API Protector is 3.0%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wallarm NG WAF is 1.1%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Akamai App and API Protector	3.0%
Wallarm NG WAF	1.1%
Other	95.9%

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

Gavin Pinho

Privacy & Risk Management Vice President, Information Security at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Has provided strong protection against evolving threats but still needs support for configuration fine-tuning

The standout features of Akamai App and API Protector are rooted in it being the Web Application Firewall, where all traffic gets scanned, including the implementation of web firewall rules, and after this phase, traffic proceeds through the BMP, which is Bot Management. Akamai App and API Protector exceeds expectations in terms of AI capabilities, and it genuinely combines a plethora of advanced features. The area in which Akamai excels compared to other competitors with a WAF is in threat intelligence, as threats continually evolve, requiring ongoing updates to backend algorithms to effectively capture smart bots, and Akamai's commitment in that regard is backed by an excellent team, while other providers are still catching up.

Read full review

it_user796242

Information Security Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Helps us to monitor attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them

Set up Wallarm as a reverse proxy. Do not replace your web server. Use Wallarm first in monitoring mode, then learn from Wallarm which type of request is false positive and which type of request is not. This process takes a couple of weeks for very highly-loaded web applications (few millions of unique visitors in one month). Then you can turn Wallarm into blocking mode and everything will be fine. Do not forget to build a monitoring system, the wave, and API for it. Before we started using Wallarm, I already knew Ivan (CEO) and Stepan (COO) from a couple of years before. Ivan had his own security company and Stepan was working on a Russian security magazine called Xakep. They told us that they wanted to create a new WAF and already had a working version of it. They asked me to test it. We did tests, and it was really good. After few month after testing, we signed an agreement. Our choice was made not because we knew these guys for a long time, but because the product was really cool and we were glad to start using it as one of the first on the market!

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution can scale extremely well."

"The most valuable feature is the custom rules feature. This is because many of our customers require a lot of custom rules. Because it's a very customized project for our customers, I think they have the best of everything already."

"The product is user-friendly."

"Akamai is a very reliable provider and a very safe bet that will suit most environments' needs."

"The product has a good user interface."

"Traffic filtering and WAF are valuable."

"We are getting security for each and every API."

"The CDN and the WAF features are the best in this solution."

More Akamai App and API Protector pros

"Vulnerability scanner and WAF are valuable features."

"Perimeter control and active vulnerability scanner are the most valuable features."

"Helps us to monitor situation in regards to attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them."

"They are the only solution that fits our success criteria and business objectives: WAF must have a low (<5%) false negative rate and be ready to protect from all well-known web attacks."

"The most powerful feature is the ability to first learn what type of query to make to your web application when it is attacked and what type of query creates a false positive to your app."

"With active threat detection, we are no longer over-swamped with tons of useless events."

Cons

"The interface is a little bit clunky and can be improved."

"The WAF features definitely have a lot of room for improvement. A lot of the WAF is really basic. For some products or some of our solutions, we need to run a second layer of more advanced WAF. If it had better layer seven protection then we would not need a second WAF."

"I do not see any area for improvement. Akamai is already maintaining its own databases for the security concerns, vulnerabilities, and attacks that are there. If anything, they should have a solution in the infrastructure security area as well. They should not be only in cloud cybersecurity; they should also be in infrastructure security."

"The product really isn't very user-friendly."

"They are already very flexible, but room for improvement is there. Reports generation could be better and should be improved."

"The solution could offer even more integrations."

"There are some issues with pushing configurations across a network. It still takes about 20 minutes and that means to retract it's another 20 minutes."

"One thing I asked them is to integrate the API discovery product that they have and push that data into Akamai App and API Protector so that we do not have two types of reviews to identify the type of traffic. We already know the APIs that are frequently getting used, so analysis becomes easier. We can integrate both products and use them."

More Akamai App and API Protector cons

"The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm. Now, it is fine."

"Technical support is 6 or 7 out of 10. Sometimes we have had trouble with communication and understanding."

"It needs more customization in PDF reports."

"There were several stability issues during the first pilot."

"Wallarm uses a learning mechanism to detect attacks and to avoid false positives. If Wallarm blocks some illegitimate request, then you can go to the management console and mark this request as false positive, but sometimes this does not work properly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is at the medium level. It is not very high. It is also not very low. It serves the purpose."

"Based on the billing discussions in the DevOps team, Akamai's cost does not seem to be a major thing. However, LOE is an issue. When it comes to support, we know that even all the competitors do this. For a 30-minute issue, they give us a LOE of one or two hours. That is a basic practice, but that is something we worry about."

"Akamai is very expensive."

"If you want quality, you have to pay the price. Its price is fair. Their account managers are also very helpful. They help you a lot with pricing even though they are working with Akamai."

"Price-wise, I would say Akamai's pricing is competitive."

"Its price is slightly high. Every company has a justification for the high price. Overall, it feels worth the money based on how the service has been structured, but we do negotiate it."

"The solution is expensive."

"Cost depends on the volume of traffic."

More Akamai App and API Protector pricing and cost advice

"Pricing must be cheaper than the competition and the licensing must be good."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Comms Service Provider

Performing Arts

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

20%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	18

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Akamai Web Application Protector?

There are no significant areas for improvement on the WAF side or for Akamai App and API Protector solution; they are comprehensive in their current state.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Akamai Web Application Protector?

The main use case for Akamai App and API Protector is serving as the WAF, Web Application Firewall.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Akamai Web Application Protector?

The primary way Akamai App and API Protector helps manage evolving cyber threats is by considering the impact on revenue, with businesses evaluating if Akamai is worth the cost based on potential l...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

AWS Shield vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 9% of the time

AWS WAF vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 5% of the time

Radware DDoS vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 4% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 4% of the time

Corero vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 4% of the time

More Akamai App and API Protector Competitors

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 13% of the time

Salt Security vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 12% of the time

Venusense Web Application Firewall vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 9% of the time

Cloudflare vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 5% of the time

Cequence Security vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 5% of the time

More Wallarm NG WAF Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Akamai App and API Protector

October 2026

Download Akamai App and API Protector product report

Buyer's Guide

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

October 2026

Download Wallarm NG WAF product report

Also Known As

Akamai Web Application Protector, Akamai Kona Site Defender, Akamai Kona DDoS Defender

Wallarm NG-WAF

Overview

Akamai App and API Protector provides website security by preventing DDoS attacks, acting as an application firewall, managing content delivery, and monitoring APIs. It adapts to threat profiles and is used for fast media delivery and identifying malicious activities.

Akamai App and API Protector offers strong protection, adaptable security features, and efficient traffic management. Its WAF blocks IP addresses and country-specific threats while preventing SQL injections. Companies utilize it for scalable CDN services and comprehensive traffic analysis. Known for its cost-effectiveness and user-friendly dashboard, this protector stands out for its customizable rules and technical support. Users also highlight the ease of integration and detailed attack insights available through its advanced dashboard.

What are the key features of Akamai App and API Protector?

DDoS Protection: Strong defense against Distributed Denial of Service attacks.
Scalable CDN: Manages content delivery efficiently under high traffic loads.
WAF Capabilities: Blocks specific IPs and countries, prevents SQL injections.
Traffic Filtering: Analyzes and controls incoming requests to maintain security.
Adaptive Stream Delivery: Adjusts content delivery to meet bandwidth needs.

What benefits should users expect?

Cost-Effectiveness: Provides robust security tools at a competitive price.
Enhanced Security: Comprehensive protection against cyber threats.
Scalability: Easily handles increasing traffic and data loads.
Ease of Integration: Simple integration with existing systems.
Insightful Analytics: Offers data-driven insights into traffic and attack patterns.

In media, Akamai App and API Protector ensures smooth streaming by handling high bandwidth demands. E-commerce companies use it to guard against fraud and data breaches. Financial sectors rely on its ability to protect sensitive transactions. Implementations in healthcare focus on safeguarding patient data while maintaining compliance with regulations.

Akamai

Wallarm NG WAF provides advanced security by integrating machine learning, making it essential for modern web applications. It offers protection against sophisticated threats and automates many processes.

Wallarm NG WAF leverages AI-driven technology to deliver robust security measures. It helps in defending web applications from cybersecurity threats with enhanced threat detection and response capabilities. Beyond vulnerability insights, Wallarm enhances security protocols, scales with growing online demands, and ensures comprehensive threat coverage, fostering a safer web environment.

What are the key features of Wallarm NG WAF?

AI-Powered Threat Detection: Identifies and mitigates sophisticated attacks efficiently.
Automated Security Updates: Continuously updates defense strategies without manual intervention.
Flexible Deployment: Easily integrates across cloud, on-premise, and hybrid setups.
Scalability: Adapts to growing traffic volumes with consistent protection.
Detailed Reporting: Provides comprehensive analytics on web security posture.

What benefits can users expect from Wallarm NG WAF?

Increased Security: Enhances threat detection and reduces vulnerabilities.
Operational Efficiency: Reduces manual intervention with automated tasks.
Cost-Effectiveness: Optimizes security expenditure by preventing potential breaches.
Time Savings: Automates repetitive actions, saving valuable time for IT teams.

In industries like finance, e-commerce, and healthcare, Wallarm NG WAF is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with stringent security standards. Its adaptability allows it to meet industry-specific requirements, offering specialized configurations tailored to each sector's unique demands.

Wallarm

Sample Customers

Douglas Omaha Technology Commission, ZALORA, PrintPlanet

Panasonic. Miro. Rappi. Wargaming. Gannett. Omio. Acronis. Workforce Software. Tipalti. SEMRush.

Buyer's Guide

Akamai App and API Protector vs. Wallarm NG WAF

September 2026

Free Report: Akamai App and API Protector vs. Wallarm NG WAF

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai App and API Protector vs. Wallarm NG WAF and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Akamai App and API Protector vs. Wallarm NG WAF report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.