AgilePoint vs Caspio vs QuickBase comparison

AgilePoint and Caspio are both solutions in the Rapid Application Development Software category. AgilePoint is ranked #22 with an average rating of 9.0, while Caspio is ranked #30. AgilePoint holds a 0.6% mindshare in RADS, compared to Caspio’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of AgilePoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Caspio users who would recommend it.

AgilePoint

Read 6 AgilePoint reviews

887 Views
452 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Caspio

Read 1 Caspio review

435 Views
357 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

QuickBase

Read 75 QuickBase reviews

1,884 Views
1,300 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

AgilePoint

Caspio

QuickBase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AgilePoint, Caspio, and QuickBase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, ServiceNow, Oracle and others in Rapid Application Development Software.

To learn more, read our detailed Rapid Application Development Software Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Rapid Application Development Software

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,570 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of AgilePoint is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Caspio is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QuickBase is 1.5%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rapid Application Development Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
QuickBase	1.5%
AgilePoint	0.6%
Caspio	0.5%
Other	97.4%

Rapid Application Development Software

Featured Reviews

Ayush S

Automation Developer at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Provides efficient process management features, but it needs more integration capabilities

We use AgilePoint for an idea submission application for our business processes. It allows managers to review and update the approved idea on the dashboard AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management. We can integrate it with many applications including Microsoft, UiPath, and other…

Read full review

Timothy Soares

Channels and Payments Administrator at Finabank N.V.

It's a good solution for those with limited coding experience

The visualization of the data pages could be improved. You have to a lot of tweaking to make the visualization stand out. It's basic, but there are a lot of options. So you really have to do a lot of customizing on that part. They could add some templates that are more attractive than the basic ones. It would be helpful if you could start with something that's already built rather than working on standard templates from scratch.

Read full review

Bhavatha Ranjanni S

Data Analyst at Global Value Web

Its extensive scope allows multiple users with diverse professional backgrounds to engage on a single platform

When learning QuickBase, I noticed a shift in its cost structure. It operated on a cost-efficient model tied to the number of users, with invoicing based on applicants. The recent changes have increased costs based on user activity, such as viewing reports or interacting with specific fields. This shift makes QuickBase more expensive to use as activity increases. Lowering these costs could potentially broaden QuickBase's user base, similar to how Microsoft PowerApps operates. The visualization in QuickBase could be enhanced. Due to cost and usage efficiency concerns, our utilization of QuickBase is limited within our company. A few individuals are currently utilizing QuickBase. We need to consider the cost-to-usage ratio and prioritize increasing adoption.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AgilePoint has improved our organization by making form implementation easier and to plan for future growth."

"The solution's workflows are its most useful feature."

"The initial setup of AgilePoint was very easy."

"AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management."

"AgilePoint's automation is excellent in managing different user roles and handling data associated with a particular instance of the workflow."

"I like the design and the integration capacity. It's also easy to use."

"Caspio was user-friendly compared to other solutions. As someone who doesn't know a lot about coding, I found it easy to create a web application on this platform."

"Considering factors like functionality and price, the product proves to be worth the investment."

"We have made good use of the ability in QuickBase to add multiple apps for various departments and purposes, while some apps are shared."

"QuickBase reminds me when a software license or a hardware support contract is near expiration so that I can initiate our company's procurement process in time and not miss a deadline."

"The need for little to no code knowledge has been huge."

"The reporting tool: It helps in data analytics to provide the solution more efficiency."

"The product is easy to use."

"Allows users have anytime/anywhere access."

"This solution has provided for Rapid deployment of data collection tools, replacing spreadsheets with near real-time data."

More QuickBase pros

Cons

"It could be more flexible, but it's already a good solution for the designer."

"The solution should be able to support Docker. This would help make scalability easier."

"Some issues with AgilePoint's design, AI and UX are some of the major problems we deal with when handling our company's business models or processes."

"While the platform is good and it has a lot of options, I would like to see more alternative features in future versions such as connectors to IDM. Currently, they have only ADFS and Okta."

"Integrations and customizations should be improved in AgilePoint and other low-code solutions."

"They should add more information about functionality."

"Integrations and customizations should be improved in AgilePoint and other low-code solutions."

"The visualization of the data pages could be improved. You have to a lot of tweaking to make the visualization stand out. It's basic, but there are a lot of options. So you really have to do a lot of customizing on that part. They could add some templates that are more attractive than the basic ones. It would be helpful if you could start with something that's already built rather than working on standard templates from scratch."

"Whenever we do onboarding, or we get new employees, there tends to be a delay of not just a week but a couple of weeks, and sometimes even a few weeks of being able to see certain new employees in the system."

"I would like to see the reporting enhanced because some of them are not easy to generate."

"I would like to see better options for producing paper reports from Quick Base, rather than viewing things exclusively on screen."

"Third-party integration -- they are working on it and I find their brand-new still-in-beta Webhooks very promising."

"This rule: The Maximum is 60 rules. We need to provide more in order to improve."

"There is room for improvement in terms of user-friendliness."

"Its UI needs improvement. They should improve it and make it a little bit more modern. We should also be able to have more real-time information that connects with other software platforms. It has an open API, but it doesn't always connect with some of the other platforms that we would like to utilize. These are probably two of the biggest things for us, and hopefully, they will keep ensuring that in the future, they continually build QuickBase to be a little bit more efficient in that regard."

"They could enhance the ability to link records between tables directly without the need for additional automation to increase space and time."

More QuickBase cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think the price is reasonable."

"Price-wise, AgilePoint is a cheap tool and a standard application for running analytics in an IT environment."

"I believe the pricing has changed recently. We had purchased one license per server, and it was about $2,000. It was a one-time payment. It's possible that they have recently implemented a new cost structure and now have yearly subscriptions."

"It is more cost-effective than local tools."

Information not available

"You have to negotiate the price because it varies based on the number of users you have, as well as how much cloud storage space you need."

"The pricing for the tier my company used included ten seats and the subcontractor, amounting to approximately $18,000 USD per year."

"We felt the pricing and licensing for QuickBase were easy enough to understand, fair and competitive."

"The solution is expensive and geared toward enterprise-level clients."

"The pricing for QuickBase is pretty straightforward, It is based on a per user/per month licensing fee."

"The product is cheap when compared to other products."

"It is probably about 300 per license per person. There is just the licensing cost. There are no additional costs."

"Quickbase is probably not the cheapest app out there. That said, it is worth its weight in gold. There is no other app that I know of in the market today that can do what Quickbase does."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,570 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

University

No data available

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

Transportation Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	38
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AgilePoint?

AgilePoint is worth the money, especially for small teams. However, I am not familiar with their enterprise pricing m...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AgilePoint?

There is room for improvement in integrations and customizations for AgilePoint and other low-code, no-code solutions...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AgilePoint?

I use AgilePoint for business process automation. Traditionally, approvals and file movements within an organization ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about QuickBase?

The most valuable feature of QuickBase is its dynamic form capabilities. These forms allow backend automation, making...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QuickBase?

Pricing could be cheaper. I rate it around a seven out of ten. Mainly larger companies use it, which influences the p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with QuickBase?

The user interface of Quick Base is complex. It can be difficult to navigate, and ideally, it should be simplified to...

See all answers

Comparisons

Nintex Process Platform vs AgilePoint

Compared 17% of the time

Camunda vs AgilePoint

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs AgilePoint

Compared 16% of the time

OutSystems vs AgilePoint

Compared 13% of the time

Mendix vs AgilePoint

Compared 13% of the time

More AgilePoint Competitors

Zoho Creator vs Caspio

Compared 54% of the time

Knack vs Caspio

Compared 25% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs Caspio

Compared 20% of the time

More Caspio Competitors

Microsoft Power Apps vs QuickBase

Compared 19% of the time

ServiceNow vs QuickBase

Compared 17% of the time

Mendix vs QuickBase

Compared 10% of the time

OutSystems vs QuickBase

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs QuickBase

Compared 7% of the time

More QuickBase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

August 2025

Download AgilePoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid Application Development Software

September 2025

Download Caspio product report

Buyer's Guide

QuickBase

September 2025

Download QuickBase product report

Also Known As

No data available

Quick Base, TSheets

Overview

AgilePoint NX is a top-five low-code platform that empowers you to quickly build anything from simple eforms and workflows to complex, multi-tenant SaaS apps, IoT apps, and composite LOB systems without writing code and at a price almost any enterprise can afford.

AgilePoint

Caspio is the world’s leading NO-CODE platform for building custom business applications without coding. Scale up with UNLIMITED app builders and users at no extra cost.

Caspio provides an intuitive visual application builder that guides you through every aspect of creating sophisticated cloud applications. Create custom web forms, searchable databases, multi-user portals, interactive dashboards, automated workflows and much more — in a fraction of the time compared to traditional development.

By empowering business professionals to create their own applications, Caspio sets a new standard for doing more with less. Align your frontline customer-facing teams, business operations and IT departments like never before. Automate processes, eliminate data silos and enable digital transformation with less strain on backlogged IT departments.

With Caspio's low-code approach, launch custom applications fast and drive continuous improvement across the business — all using clicks, not code.

Caspio

Trusted by more than half of the Fortune 100, QuickBase is a low-code platform for building, customizing, and integrating custom business applications. With more than 6,000 customers and 500,000 active users, QuickBase is the technology of choice for organizations that want to empower business users to solve their own challenges while maintaining the governance and security of an enterprise-quality app development system.

Quickbase

Sample Customers

Caja Laboral, Elbit Systems, Daisy Brand

Florida Department of Health, AdvanceKentucky, Japan Center for International Exchange (JCIE), Philips, Comcast, Coca Cola, HP, Whirlpool, Verizon, Lenovo, Yale University

Procter & Gamble, Tesla, Norwegian Cruise Line, Google, Metso, Agero, Kayak, PTC, Patra Corp, TomTom, Southwest Airlines, FedEx Office

Buyer's Guide

Rapid Application Development Software

September 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, ServiceNow, Oracle and others in Rapid Application Development Software. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,570 professionals have used our research since 2012.