Adabas vs ENEA Polyhedra comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Software AG Logo
109 views|88 comparisons
ENEA Logo
59 views|38 comparisons
Ranking
8th
Views
109
Comparisons
88
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
15th
Views
59
Comparisons
38
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Polyhedra
Learn More
Overview

Database server for large and mission-critical business applications that require sub-second response times.

Polyhedra is a family of compact, lightweight, SQL relational database management systems (RDBMS) optimized for embedded systems applications. Built on an ironclad clientserver architecture, Polyhedra in-memory database system (IMDB) and Polyhedra FlashLite provide a secure data repository for embedded systems, mobile devices and server-based applications demanding the utmost in performance and reliability.
Sample Customers
Public Authority of Civil Information (PACI), Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality (EMM), Alliance Healthcare, Florida State College, Smals, Santander Consumer Bank Austria, Apollo-Optik
Xilinx, Freescale Semiconductor, AMD

Adabas is ranked 8th in Non-Relational Databases while ENEA Polyhedra is ranked 15th in Non-Relational Databases. Adabas is rated 0.0, while ENEA Polyhedra is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Adabas is most compared with IBM IMS and CA IDMS, whereas ENEA Polyhedra is most compared with .

See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.