Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Adabas vs ENEA Polyhedra comparison

Software AG and ENEA are both solutions in the Non-Relational Databases category. Software AG is ranked #10, while ENEA is ranked #17. Software AG holds a 3.8% mindshare in NRD, compared to ENEA’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ENEA users are willing to recommend the solution.
Adabas
  • 140 Views
  • 113 Comparison Views
ENEA Polyhedra
  • 97 Views
  • 97 Comparison Views
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Adabas and ENEA Polyhedra based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, InfluxData, Actian and others in Non-Relational Databases.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Non-Relational Databases Report (Updated: January 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Non-Relational Databases
January 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Adabas
Ranking in Non-Relational Databases
10th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ENEA Polyhedra
Ranking in Non-Relational Databases
17th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Non-Relational Databases category, the mindshare of Adabas is 3.8%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ENEA Polyhedra is 2.6%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Non-Relational Databases Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Adabas3.8%
ENEA Polyhedra2.6%
Other93.6%
Non-Relational Databases
Buyer's Guide
Non-Relational Databases
January 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, InfluxData, Actian and others in Non-Relational Databases. Updated: January 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

TigerLogic XDMS vs Adabas Logo
TigerLogic XDMS vs Adabas
Compared 100% of the time
More Adabas Competitors
Oracle Berkeley DB vs ENEA Polyhedra Logo
Oracle Berkeley DB vs ENEA Polyhedra
Compared 100% of the time
More ENEA Polyhedra Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Non-Relational Databases
January 2026
Adabas reportDownload Adabas product report
Buyer's Guide
Non-Relational Databases
January 2026
ENEA Polyhedra reportDownload ENEA Polyhedra product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Polyhedra
 

Overview

Database server for large and mission-critical business applications that require sub-second response times.

Software AG
Polyhedra is a family of compact, lightweight, SQL relational database management systems (RDBMS) optimized for embedded systems applications. Built on an ironclad clientserver architecture, Polyhedra in-memory database system (IMDB) and Polyhedra FlashLite provide a secure data repository for embedded systems, mobile devices and server-based applications demanding the utmost in performance and reliability.
ENEA
 

Sample Customers

Public Authority of Civil Information (PACI), Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality (EMM), Alliance Healthcare, Florida State College, Smals, Santander Consumer Bank Austria, Apollo-Optik
Xilinx, Freescale Semiconductor, AMD
Buyer's Guide
Non-Relational Databases
January 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, InfluxData, Actian and others in Non-Relational Databases. Updated: January 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.