ActiveBatch by Redwood vs JSCAPE by Redwood comparison

ActiveBatch by Redwood and Redwood Software are both solutions in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category. ActiveBatch by Redwood is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.5, while Redwood Software is ranked #10 with an average rating of 10.0. ActiveBatch by Redwood holds a 2.5% mindshare in MFT, compared to Redwood Software’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ActiveBatch by Redwood users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Redwood Software users who would recommend it.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Read 37 ActiveBatch by Redwood reviews

2,226 Views
712 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

JSCAPE by Redwood

Read 22 JSCAPE by Redwood reviews

1,141 Views
1,118 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

ActiveBatch by Redwood

JSCAPE by Redwood

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

JSCAPE by Redwood and ActiveBatch by Redwood compete in the file transfer and automation software category. JSCAPE appears to have the upper hand in handling complex workflows and high security, whereas ActiveBatch stands out for its extensive pre-built automation features and flexible scheduling.

Features: JSCAPE offers high scalability, strong encryption for data security, and audit trails that enhance its compliance capabilities. Users appreciate its ability to handle complex workflows and automate processes using triggers. It also centralizes file transfers into a single interface. ActiveBatch provides extensive pre-built automation capabilities, making it easy to manage various systems and applications. It facilitates flexible job scheduling, supports complex workflows, and integrates seamlessly with other platforms providing end-to-end visibility.

Room for Improvement: JSCAPE could improve by offering more customization options and intuitive interfaces. Its documentation for new features could be clearer, and support for complex workflows could be enhanced. ActiveBatch might benefit from a more user-friendly interface and better accessibility for new users. Improved documentation and more cloud-based integrations would enhance the user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JSCAPE supports deployment in hybrid and on-premises environments and offers 24/7 customer service, though users have suggested the addition of on-call or chat support. ActiveBatch is primarily on-premises but also supports hybrid and public cloud settings. It is known for responsive customer support, though improvements in communication and support access could enhance user satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: JSCAPE is praised for affordable licensing options, contributing to time and cost savings in file management, although some find its pricing relatively high. ActiveBatch is generally viewed as reasonably priced for the features offered, with subscription benefits available, although recent pricing changes have raised concerns. Both solutions deliver a notable ROI by enhancing operational efficiency and providing robust support, despite differing opinions on cost-effectiveness.

To learn more, read our detailed ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. JSCAPE by Redwood Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. JSCAPE by Redwood

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,954 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

14th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (28th), Workload Automation (14th)

JSCAPE by Redwood

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

10th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of ActiveBatch by Redwood is 2.5%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JSCAPE by Redwood is 4.4%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed File Transfer (MFT) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
JSCAPE by Redwood	4.4%
ActiveBatch by Redwood	2.5%
Other	93.1%

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

Featured Reviews

Abdul_Samad

Application Administrator Lead at Bluestem

Manages thousands of jobs daily and reduces downtime through secondary node support

The current feedback I receive from my end users regarding ActiveBatch by Redwood highlights issues with the tabs or panes during job modification. When the next user monitors it, they need to close the pane or job and reopen it to see the changes reflected. If the end user makes an update, it will not be visible unless they start from the beginning again. Implementing a refresh button would be helpful for real-time updates when the end user needs to see changes immediately. We currently face issues with the web console of ActiveBatch by Redwood. When users operate through an RDP session, every user has their own ActiveBatch by Redwood application. However, on the web console, users encounter daily activity issues where the job instances do not appear or update correctly, and they cannot view the latest logs. This issue is only present on the web console, as the application itself works without any problems. ActiveBatch by Redwood can be improved by adding more features, as we are not currently handling cloud-based applications like S3 buckets and Azure. Connecting to these cloud platforms would be a helpful enhancement.

Read full review

Akshatha Ramesh

Junior Business Analyst at EFI

Good automation, no complex coding, and high-level data encryption

When it comes to performance and scalability, JSCAPE is a highly reliable software, however, I would suggest a few improvements: 1. The documentation needs a revamp for a better understanding of the features of the tool. 2. Customer service can be offered on call or chat. 3. The initial setup is time-consuming; it could use a video tutorial. 4. UI can be improved in terms of look and feel. 5. Documentation should be provided for a majority of newly released features as these can be difficult for a layman to use without proper instructions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It can connect to a number of third-party/legacy systems."

"It is very useful in sending confidential files through FPP servers."

"The software offers real-time monitoring and reporting features that let IT teams keep tabs on the progress of their batch operations and workflows."

"Easy to configure and simple to develop new features."

"ActiveBatch can automate predictable, repeatable processes very well. There is no real trick to what ActiveBatch does. ActiveBatch does exactly what you would expect a scheduling piece of software to do. It does it in a timely manner and does it with very little outside interference and fanfare. It runs when it is supposed to, and I don't have to jump through a bunch of hoops to double check it."

"I found ActiveBatch Workload Automation to be a very good scheduling tool. What I like best about it is that it has very less downtime when managing many complex scheduling workflows, so I'm very impressed with ActiveBatch Workload Automation."

"The nice thing about ActiveBatch is once we have created a specific job that can be easily be replicated to another job, then minimal changes will have to be made. This makes things nice. Reduction of coding is substantial in a lot of cases. The replication of one job to another is just doing a few minor tweaks and rolling it into production. This decreases our development costs substantially."

"By implementing a sophisticated scheduling mechanism, the system allows for the precise triggering of jobs at user-selected frequencies, enabling a seamless and automated execution of tasks according to specified time intervals."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood pros

"Automating and managing the file transfer using JSCAPE has decreased the manual interventions necessary and increased the organization's efficiency and productivity."

"We can send the data quickly and securely."

"It is easy to transfer large sets of files."

"It is platform-independent and can flawlessly work on any operating system using the latest security standards."

"It offers audit trails and reporting tools, allowing users to track file transfers, monitor user activities, and produce regulatory compliance reports."

"The speed of transferring large datasets is super quick, which allows us to work on multiple tasks at a time."

"It is a reliable and easy-to-operate platform for secure file transfers."

"One of the standout features of this particular tool is its automation capabilities."

More JSCAPE by Redwood pros

Cons

"The UI could potentially offer a more refined and user-friendly experience, fostering smoother interactions and facilitating easier navigation for users engaging with the application."

"We currently face issues with the web console of ActiveBatch by Redwood. When users operate through an RDP session, every user has their own ActiveBatch by Redwood application. However, on the web console, users encounter daily activity issues where the job instances do not appear or update correctly, and they cannot view the latest logs."

"I believe ActiveBatch by Redwood could be improved because the UI could be modernized."

"Whenever there is an overload, we are seeing crashes happening."

"The monitoring dashboard could have been more user-friendly so that in the monitoring dashboard itself we can see the total number of jobs created in the system and how many were currently active/scheduled/chained."

"The interface is not that user-friendly and is a little tough to navigate."

"One thing I've noticed is that navigation can be difficult unless you are familiar with the structure that we have in place. If someone else had to look at our ActiveBatch console and find a job, they might not know where to find it."

"Between version 10 and version 12 there was a change. In version 10, they had each object in its own folder. But on the back end, they saw it at the root level. So when we moved over to version 12, everything was in the same area mixed together. It was incredibly difficult and we actually had to create our own folders and move those objects—like schedules, jobs, user accounts—and manually put those into folders, whereas the previous version already had it."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood cons

"The product's pricing needs improvement."

"Enhancing the user interface would make it more accessible and appealing to the new users and it will definitely enhance the user experience."

"Support for more complicated workflows, such as conditional logic or branching, could be added to allow users to create more advanced automation processes."

"They could create an in-depth document so that any user with little to no background can implement this and use the software effectively."

"With constant software releases and updates, detailed notifications and documentation on the improvements along with the comparison of the past and present features would be helpful to understand and use it better."

"The documentation part can be improved to be more precise for beginners to understand the advanced features of the tool."

"The cost of the tool is relatively high and can pose a problem to medium and small-scale companies who are trying to overcome their on-premise server limitations."

"The initial setup and configuration are time-consuming."

More JSCAPE by Redwood cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing was fair. There are additional costs for the plugins. We have the standard licensing fees for different pieces, then we have the plugins which were add-ons. However, we expected that."

"If you compare ActiveBatch licensing to Control-M, you're looking at $50,000 as opposed to millions."

"The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking."

"Currently, we are paying approximately $7,000 yearly, which includes support."

"It allows for lower operational overhead."

"I don't think we've ever had a problem with the pricing or licensing. Even the maintenance fees are very much in line. They are not excessive. I think for the support that you get, you get a good value for your money. It's the best value on the market."

"I like ActiveBatch Workload Automation's licensing model because they're not holding you down on an agentless model or agent model, where every server needs to have an agent. That's the main selling point of the solution and I hope they stay that way."

"ActiveBatch is currently redesigning themselves. In the past, they were a low cost solution for automation. They had a nice tool that was very inexpensive. With their five-year plan, they will be more enhancement-driven, so they're trying to improve their software, customer service, and the way that their customers get information from them. In doing that, they're raising the price of their base system. They changed from one pricing model to another, which has caused some friction between ActiveBatch and us. We're working through that right now with them. That's one of the reasons why we're why we were evaluating other software packages."

"The software is expensive compared to other vendors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,954 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Insurance Company

Retailer

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	47

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	35

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for ActiveBatch by Redwood has been great; we recently renewed our license, and it was a smooth process without any issues.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

I believe ActiveBatch by Redwood could be improved because the UI could be modernized.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

My main use case for ActiveBatch by Redwood is file processing. I use ActiveBatch by Redwood for file processing for debit card transactions.

See all answers

What do you like most about JSCAPE?

The product's most valuable feature is the high availability clustering.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JSCAPE?

I rate the product’s pricing a three out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with JSCAPE?

JSCAPE ensures data integrity. You know that the file has been transferred and on which date, as we provide timestamps. We handle cybersecurity ourselves with proprietary technologies for the netwo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Control-M vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 17% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 11% of the time

Stonebranch vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 10% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 8% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 7% of the time

More ActiveBatch by Redwood Competitors

GoAnywhere MFT vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 37% of the time

MOVEit vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 33% of the time

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 7% of the time

Kiteworks vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 6% of the time

Globalscape EFT vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 6% of the time

More JSCAPE by Redwood Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood

January 2026

Download ActiveBatch by Redwood product report

Buyer's Guide

JSCAPE by Redwood

January 2026

Download JSCAPE by Redwood product report

Also Known As

ActiveBatch

No data available

Overview

ActiveBatch by Redwood enhances efficiency with features like job scheduling, integration, and real-time monitoring. It supports diverse platforms, automates tasks, and offers a single-pane view with robust security.

ActiveBatch streamlines automation by offering drag-and-drop functionality, pre-built job steps, and native integrations. Its customizable workflows and alert system aid in managing complex workloads like data processing and server monitoring across hybrid environments. While it effectively reduces manual errors and enhances productivity, areas like navigation and support for cloud platforms need enhancement. New users may face challenges due to its complexity and steep learning curve, and further improvements in reporting, mobile access, and training could provide additional support to users.

What important features does ActiveBatch offer?

Comprehensive Job Scheduling: Manages and automates complex workloads efficiently.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly connects with different platforms and applications.
Real-time Monitoring: Offers a single-pane view for quick issue identification.
Customizable Workflows: Tailors processes to specific organizational tasks.
Robust Alert System: Ensures timely notifications for critical events.
Data Protection: Incorporates strong security measures for secure operations.

What benefits should be considered when evaluating ActiveBatch?

Enhanced Efficiency: Automates repetitive tasks, reducing manual intervention.
Improved Productivity: Streamlines processes across hybrid environments.
Error Reduction: Decreases likelihood of manual errors.
Platform Support: Provides integration with diverse systems.

In finance, ActiveBatch is implemented for orchestrating batch processes and data management. The healthcare industry utilizes it for automating patient data updates and server monitoring, while the retail sector benefits from file transfers and inventory management automation.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

JSCAPE platform offers independent managed file transfer (MFT) software that allows users to secure and automate data exchange with trading partners, clients and internal transfers. Built-in security features and audit functions support PCI DSS, HIPAA, GLBA and Sarbanes-Oxley compliance. SaaS (MFTaaS) offering available.

Redwood Software

Sample Customers

Informatica, D&H, ACES, PrimeSource, Sub-Zero Group, SThree, Lamar Advertising, Subway, Xcel Energy, Ignite Technologies, Whataburger, Jyske Bank, Omaha Children's Hospital

BAE Systems, ABN AMRO, Boeing, Bank of America, Dassault Falcon Jet Corp, Bank of Montreal, General Dynamics, Bank of Taiwan, General Electric, Citibank Canada, Honeywell, CreditSuisse, L-3 Communications, Columbia University, Harvard Medical School, Kaplan Higher Education, Northwest Christian College, Kaiser Permanente, Share Builder, Procter & Gamble, TransUnion, Roche Diagnostics, BASF, 1-800-Contacts, Canon, AMPM, Daimler AG, Coach, Edwards Brothers, USB Financial Services

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. JSCAPE by Redwood

December 2025

Free Report: ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. JSCAPE by Redwood

Find out what your peers are saying about ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. JSCAPE by Redwood and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,954 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. JSCAPE by Redwood report.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.