We performed a comparison between Ab Initio Co>Operating System and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Workload Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Co>Operating System's most valuable feature is its ability to process bulk data effectively."
"Ab Initio reaches the highest performance and is very flexible in processing huge amounts of data."
"The initial setup is quite easy because the solution has a good interface through which the configuration, mapping, and so on can be done."
"Mule Anypoint Platform's valuable features are its flexibility in terms of deployment and its SaaS capabilities."
"We are very satisfied with the DevOps support."
"The flexibility has been great overall."
"The most valuable feature of Mule Anypoint Platform is rapid development."
"The most valuable features for us are flexibility, all the features related to connectivity with multiple connectors to the business, and the flexibility of on-premises and cloud deployments."
"It can scale."
"The product’s ability to seamlessly translate protocols is great."
"Co>Operating System would be improved with more integrations for less well-known technologies."
"An awesome improvement would be big data solutions, for example, implementing some kind of business intelligence or neural networks for artificial intelligence."
"The solution is very expensive. They need to work on the pricing."
"Although the solution's proxy design and process are good, it faces connecting issues because it lacks data integration."
"There is not much information on the internet...The transforming message is an area in the solution that needs to be improved."
"What I hear from my customers is that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites. The cost keeps increasing. MuleSoft should come up with customization factors by using a different way of getting the cost-related stuff to attract customers. That is, they should come up with some cost optimizations."
"I would like to see some data integration and automation."
"The compatibility with vendors can be improved. Microsoft Azure heavily uses single software."
"The runtime management and connectors could use some work and are vulnerable to breakage after upgrades."
"The price could be improved."
More Ab Initio Co>Operating System Pricing and Cost Advice →
Ab Initio Co>Operating System is ranked 19th in Workload Automation with 2 reviews while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 8th in Workload Automation with 40 reviews. Ab Initio Co>Operating System is rated 9.6, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Ab Initio Co>Operating System writes "High performance and flexible solution for companies with large amounts of data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". Ab Initio Co>Operating System is most compared with SSIS, Collibra Catalog, AWS Glue, Informatica Cloud Data Integration and Talend Data Management Platform, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and SAP Cloud Platform. See our Ab Initio Co>Operating System vs. Mule Anypoint Platform report.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.