• Home
  • A10 Networks Thunder CGN vs. Nokia Virtualized Service Router

A10 Networks Thunder CGN vs Nokia Virtualized Service Router comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Bruce Boardman
Extremely reliable; freeing up a lot of our IP space
It has freed up a lot of our IP space and has been extremely reliable. We have set it up in a high availability scenario, testing it many times. It... Read more →
Use Nokia Virtualized Service Router?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The cost to buy it initially was a single purchase price. This was a cost for the hardware and software, but we got a year of service with it. Annually, we pay them a service fee, but it's not much money."
  • "The FlexPool consumption-based licensing model has the ability to spin up VMs as needed for NAT, as well as their ADC, which is their load balancing stuff. We are considering that, as that is a pretty attractive feature."

    • More A10 Networks Thunder CGN Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    1st
    out of 4 in Carrier Grade Network Address Translation
    Views
    479
    Comparisons
    209
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    4th
    out of 4 in Carrier Grade Network Address Translation
    Views
    97
    Comparisons
    40
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    A10 Networks
    Nokia
    Overview

    Extend IPv4 Connectivity
    Solve IPv4 address exhaustion and extend the life of an IPv4 network infrastructure with carrier-grade NAT to ensure critical applications and services are always available and reliable.

    Manage IPv6 Migration
    Enable a smooth transition to IPv6 by supporting translation and tunneling between IPv4 and IPv6 networks.

    Reduce TCO
    High performance in a compact form factor results in lower OPEX and CAPEX through efficient rack space usage, lower power consumption and reduced cooling requirements.

    Key features
    • Wide range of supported VNFs
    • High performance
    • Elastic cloud scalability
    • Resiliency and robustness
    • Advanced VNF management capabilities
    Key benefits
    • Increased deployment agility and flexibility
    • Rapid service introduction
    • Flexible configuration and service chaining
    • Lower service rollout risks
    • Ease of interoperability
    • Optimized use of resources and improved
    telecommunications and IT integration

    Sample Customers
    Leucom Group
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Construction Company8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business45%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise33%
    No Data Available

    A10 Networks Thunder CGN is ranked 1st in Carrier Grade Network Address Translation while Nokia Virtualized Service Router is ranked 4th in Carrier Grade Network Address Translation. A10 Networks Thunder CGN is rated 9.0, while Nokia Virtualized Service Router is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of A10 Networks Thunder CGN writes "Extremely reliable; freeing up a lot of our IP space". On the other hand, A10 Networks Thunder CGN is most compared with Junos Address Aware and Fortinet FortiCarrier, whereas Nokia Virtualized Service Router is most compared with .

    See our list of best Carrier Grade Network Address Translation vendors.

    We monitor all Carrier Grade Network Address Translation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.